lukecash12
New member
Tribulationem et dolorem | |
So you are just black and white then. Everyone is either a believer or a usurper and enemy of God? Clarify, else I'm not seeing it.
I'm not exactly speaking in terms just black and white. In Revelation 20, which I just quoted in this thread today, those not written into the book of life are judged according to their deeds. What is clear, though, is that there are only two masters and those who aren't written into the book of life clearly are enemies of God. They are at the very least ambivalent about, and opposed to God, not apathetic.
Clearly you're referring to the element in early Christianity of accepting Origen's ideas about universal salvation; incidentally, it was under Origen's literary influence that Lucian taught Arius theology, who subsequently began the Arian controversy.Er, look dude, if you're going to start going on about the early church then you should be aware that eternal torment was hardly the prevailing theology of the time outside of Carthage. Universal restoration was more to the front before Augustine and Constantine brought the notion to the forefront. Don't presume to speak on most Christians either because outside of the more fundamentalist bracket there's plenty who aren't doctrinally bound to accept any such thing.
The historical record is clear in that the West, which propagated and accepted the Nicene Creed and canons, was a bastion against such ideas. Any involved study of Athanasius in particular will also reveal, beyond the controversy over Arian thinking that people predominantly associate Athanasius with, that not only was there a significant segment of Eastern bishops against such ideas (as well as others who disagreed with those elements in the substance of their writing, but were not so clear on the details because of complicated terminology, Eusebius being a prime example), but the laity resented Arian, Sabellian, Nestorian, Eutychian, and other such influences which took the wild, uncommitted fancies of Origen too far.
The Ecumenical Creeds were upheld, and there has always been substantial agreement on those details within the whole of Christendom. The majority Christians today worship in an older order church, and those churches which were part of the original schisms are unanimous on subject such as this. So, on the contrary, I'm not appealing to fundamentalist thinking, but what the majority of Christians believe.