I don’t consider children “wicked.”So you are going to finally rebuke the wicked? Cool! :thumb:
I believe in Original Blessing, not Original Sin.
That doctrine of a basic sinfulness of humanity comes from St. Augustine, centuries after Jesus.
I don’t consider children “wicked.”So you are going to finally rebuke the wicked? Cool! :thumb:
Infantile commentary, I think.What the hell are you talking about?
What does this have to do with the study? Are you really still trying to impute child abuse to religious people by droning on about it, as if it had anything to do with this study, which is itself already been completely discredited? Are you that far gone?
Seriously, are you on drugs?
:AMR:
Yeah, I guess you really are that far gone. Wow.
How?Except that the study is shown to be bogus...
I don’t mind telling even a psychologist like yourself that I was made more than acquainted with the Milgram research. We must have spent a month studying it in a psychology class that was probably similar to your own degree curriculum.This is very old and most freshmen psychology students are exposed to this. You do not know because you have not been a student of the field.
:nono: Genesis 6:5 Be a "BIBLE" believer, not a believer in the traditions of fallible men. The time is coming and is already come, when true worshippers must worship God in Spirit AND truth. John 4:23-24I don’t consider children “wicked.”
I believe in Original Blessing, not Original Sin.
That doctrine of a basic sinfulness of humanity comes from St. Augustine, centuries after Jesus.
And yet produce a more altruistic adult... :think:A...uthoritarian, patriarchal, obedience-based family dynamics are more common in Muslin and Christian families. This is true. This is evidence. This is fact.
Seems like 'free-association' liberal theology to me. You'd have to really spell this one out, but it has earmarks of very liberal interpretation out of the gate.If you’ve ever given any thought to the radical attacks on the family by Jesus, this is why.
How?
*CLEARLY being raised in a Christian home DOES INDEED create exponentially better altruistic patterns then their secular or other religion counterparts.
.................
:doh: Yeah, if the former USSR has taught us anything, it is that atheism produces altruism :doh: :doh: :doh:
.........*Christians by far and exponentially away, out-give all contenders.
That NECESSARILY nullifies this study....
It is difficult to believe in a tradition and yet at the same time believe in its opposite.:nono: Genesis 6:5 Be a "BIBLE" believer, not a believer in the traditions of fallible men. The time is coming and is already come, when true worshippers must worship God in Spirit AND truth. John 4:23-24
How do children learn to be altruistic when they are hit, put down, disrespected and treated unfairly?And yet produce a more altruistic adult... :think:
I have long been surprised when Christians ardently claim that Jesus never preached against the family values in his day.Seems like 'free-association' liberal theology to me. You'd have to really spell this one out, but it has earmarks of very liberal interpretation out of the gate.
Yeah, if the former USSR has taught us anything, it is that atheism produces altruism...
The horrible childhood abuse of Joseph Stalin was responsible for his abuse of his nation and countrymen and women.
Of course not. Those who were raised in authoritarian, tyrannical homes were only too happy to follow their national “Head of the Family” dictator and emulate the dad.he was the only child of that era who suffered horrible abuse?
It isn't just Christian homes at that point. I have been to a LOT of schools as a substitute teacher before I was hired on to a permanent job. I also worked at a Christian school. The kids in that school were not abused.It is difficult to believe in a tradition and yet at the same time believe in its opposite.
The Bible is a complex weave of differing traditions, theologies, agendas and metaphor. It is not “factually correct” in all instances but I see it as true, nevertheless. I take the discrepancies and contradictions seriously because they come from inspired human beings.
How do children learn to be altruistic when they are hit, put down, disrespected and treated unfairly? If I child does not deal with how s/he was treated in childhood, then they continue to mindlessly act out their pain on other people.
You should start a thread on it. It will get attention and discussion for sure. I am aware that He came to set fathers against brother, and brothers against brothers, but it doesn't mean anti-family. It means "Christian."I have long been surprised when Christians ardently claim that Jesus never preached against the family values in his day.
Well, there went that thread. I don't need to be led by the hand. I need to understand, with substantiation, what you are saying. I "can't" argue it with you until you present your case. I have a firm enough grasp of scripture to either correct you, or walk through it with you BUT you haven't explained what you mean or used example for anyone to debate or agree.I am not going to lead you by the hand when you research the Bible.
We have all had enough of this from the clergy and authoritarian types.
Again, these gloss-over comments aren't really productive and are easily dismissed because they don't really mean anything. There is a great need for a LOT more context or else it is just an exercise in mind reading, whether 'led by the hand' or not.Confront the new and remember the old: Bible study actually means “studying the Bible."
Of course not.
I'm going to keep correcting this myth, whenever I see it. Christians do not give more generously, because they demand things in return for what they give. Mostly, they demand the pretense that the recipient is 'towing the Christian line' on how to think, and how act, and how to live.And statistics prove Christians out-give their counterparts and evangelicals out-give their other Christian counter-parts.
I'm going to keep correcting this myth, whenever I see it. Christians do not give more generously, because they demand things in return for what they give.
generous adjective 1. liberal in giving or sharing; unselfish: a generous patron of the arts; a generous gift. 3. large; abundant; ample: |
Mostly, they demand the pretense that the recipient is 'towing the Christian line' on how to think, and how act, and how to live.
Christians don't give to the poor, they pay the poor to listen to Christian sermons, and say Christian prayers, and act grateful to the Christian God. And if they don't pretend to repent, they get cut off. That isn't 'giving'. That's buying.
“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’ |
...I am aware that He came to set fathers against brother, and brothers against brothers, but it doesn't mean anti-family. It means “Christian.”
What do you have in mind when you say this?I'm going to keep correcting this myth, whenever I see it. Christians do not give more generously, because they demand things in return for what they give. Mostly, they demand the pretense that the recipient is 'towing the Christian line' on how to think, and how act, and how to live.
Christians don't give to the poor, they pay the poor to listen to Christian sermons, and say Christian prayers, and act grateful to the Christian God. And if they don't pretend to repent, they get cut off. That isn't 'giving'. That's buying.
Christian charity in general. Christians don't want their charity mixed in with others, because they can't control it. So why do they want so much control? Because they want to control the people their supposedly trying to help.What do you have in mind when you say this?
Can you give any actual examples? Broad-brushing all of Christianity doesn't help. I won't say that what you're talking about doesn't exist, but I think there is much charity by Christians that isn't tied to confessions or obedience, etc.Christian charity in general. Christians don't want their charity mixed in with others, because they can't control it. So why do they want so much control? Because they want to control the people their supposedly trying to help.
Christians think controlling other people is helping them. And conversely, they think allowing people to decide for themselves what will help them, harms them.
Christians don't really "give" at all. They buy control over others, and call it "giving".
Can you give any actual examples? Broad-brushing all of Christianity doesn't help. I won't say that what you're talking about doesn't exist, but I think there is much charity by Christians that isn't tied to confessions or obedience, etc.
I provided links. You? :nono:I'm going to keep correcting this myth, whenever I see it. Christians do not give more generously, because they demand things in return for what they give. Mostly, they demand the pretense that the recipient is 'towing the Christian line' on how to think, and how act, and how to live.
Gossip is a sin. Trying to make your erroneous impressions vocal as if they are fact is a sin. You are flat-out, sinning against God and His church. The Salvation Army is an evangelical institution. The foodbank I work at is evangelical. The rescue mission is evangelical....Christians don't give to the poor, they pay the poor to listen to Christian sermons, and say Christian prayers, and act grateful to the Christian God. And if they don't pretend to repent, they get cut off. That isn't 'giving'. That's buying.
This is hate. "Give me your food and $ but shut up because I don't want to hear your garbage and I don't respect you for saying something with the money and food I'm taking from you regardless." Bitter-much? You sound like a flamer.Christians don't really "give" to others at all. They buy control over others, and call it "giving".