Was is the point you are trying to make in this thread?
The Republicans want to send the $500 million to the other thousands of clinics that provide care to women in lieu of sending it to PP, which has only about 700 facilities.
The videos show that PP is breaking the law by selling baby parts for profits, and altering the time and procedure for abortions so they can make more money from the aborted baby parts and/or cadavers.
PP was founded by Margaret Sanger, who was a racist, and a proponent of eugenics.
Mmm. They do?
Be more specific, you want that money to go to any clinics that don't provide medical services you disagree with. Organizations giving funds to political candidates is nothing new.Yes.
The Democrats, like they always do with their alleged "war on women", are spinning the defunding of PP into that the Republicans want to take away 500 million for women's health services.
That's not what the Republicans who want PP defunded are calling for.
All they want is PP defunded, not the 500 million taken away. The Republicans are just fine with the 500 million going to the thousands of other clinics that provide services for women.
The other thousands of clinics aren't selling baby parts for profit, and aren't changing abortion procedures and timing for bigger profits like PP is.
Not to mention that the other clinics aren't giving tens of millions of dollars back to Democrats.
The Democrats, like they always do with their alleged "war on women", are spinning the defunding of PP into that the Republicans want to take away 500 million for women's health services.
That's not what the Republicans who want PP defunded are calling for.
All they want is PP defunded, not the 500 million taken away.
The Republicans are just fine with the 500 million going to the thousands of other clinics that provide services for women.
That PP has nothing to do with either racism or eugenics today is frustrating to its critics, to be sure, which is why so many people lie so often and insist Planned Parenthood's got some kind of racist/eugenic/whatever agenda going on.
Wow, what a stretch. It is a real shame this isn't the case.If you go back and look at some of the things Sanger said, the people she surrounded herself with, the people she admired, the people she hired, etc., there's a lot of racism, eugenics, and other really bad stuff.
So the question becomes; are these PP clinics mostly in black neighborhoods because these black people need PP's services the most, or are these PP clinics in black neighborhoods because PP wants to abort more black babies than other babies?
For example: In 2012 there were 31,328 black babies killed by abortion in NYC compared to 24,758 born.
So, either PP is doing a wonderful service for poor blacks in NYC, or PP is making the owners of Confederate flags really happy.
Be more specific, you want that money to go to any clinics that don't provide medical services you disagree with.
Organizations giving funds to political candidates is nothing new.
Sure. Jeb's comments about too much money being spent on exactly this issue must've just been misconstrued.:yawn:
Where are you getting this idea?
It is a real shame this isn't the case.
If you go back and look at some of the things Sanger said, the people she surrounded herself with, the people she admired, the people she hired, etc., there's a lot of racism, eugenics, and other really bad stuff.
So the question becomes; are these PP clinics mostly in black neighborhoods
You made a racist claim that PP wants to perform more abortions on black people than white people. It is not the case and is slanderous.Which one?
Providing a service for poor black women, or making racists and eugenic proponents really happy?
I don't like Jeb.
However Jeb clarified what he meant. He meant the money to PP.
PP isn't the only clinic that provides women services that gets money, they're the largest.
Where are you getting the idea that the money won't go elsewhere?
You made a racist claim that PP wants to perform more abortions on black people than white people. It is not the case and is slanderous.
You are trying to make a racist argument out of a non-racist topic. Speaks volumes to your character.The numbers don't lie.
Compared to the population, the number of black abortions is much higher than non-black abortions.
So, either black women purposely have more abortions than non-black women, or PP has more clinics that provide abortions in black communities than non-black communities.
The CDC releases numbers each year.
Here are the 2010 numbers from the CDC.
Among the 28 areas that reported cross-classified race/ethnicity data for 2010 (Table 12), non-Hispanic white women and non-Hispanic black women accounted for the largest percentages of abortions (36.8% and 35.7%, respectively), whereas Hispanic women and non-Hispanic women in the other races category accounted for smaller percentages (21.0% and 6.5%, respectively). Non-Hispanic white women had the lowest abortion rates (8.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years) and ratios (141 abortions per 1,000 live births), whereas non-Hispanic black women had the highest abortion rates (31.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years) and ratios (483 abortions per 1,000 live births).
You are trying to make a racist argument out of a non-racist topic. Speaks volumes to your character.
You are trying to make a racist argument out of a non-racist topic. Speaks volumes to your character.
He's ignoring the economic disparity that's driving this as well and somehow thinks it must all be PP's fault. As though a targeted campaign is at work here on their part.