ECT Why preterism can never be taken seriously by Bible believers

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
It's great to hold the Mid-Acts Perspective.

:rotfl:

A view that claims the church began in Mid-Acts, but not one person who holds to the Mid-Acts perspective can tell us where in Mid-Acts it says so.

Not to mention, you guys can't even agree which chapter of Acts the alleged event took place.

Mid-Acts is the perfect perspective for someone as dazed and confused as you are.
 

Danoh

New member
:rotfl:

A view that claims the church began in Mid-Acts, but not one person who holds to the Mid-Acts perspective can tell us where in Mid-Acts it says so.

Not to mention, you guys can't even agree which chapter of Acts the alleged event took place.

Mid-Acts is the perfect perspective for someone as dazed and confused as you are.

Nope, we all hold it began with Paul in Acts 9.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
You guys have posted something on the order of 300 posts on this thread in the last 24 hours!

I can't keep up!

What the heck do you guys do for a living?
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
God's word is filled with continuity in the NT. That's why Paul said it was "the culmination of the ages", Peter said it was "the last days", John said " the time is near", the writer of Hebrews said it was "the last days", James said "the coming of the Lord is at hand".

However, you deny this continuity, you claim all these phrases mean something completely different.

That's rich, silly boy, as "the time is near," "at hand," in many places, is used, you moron, but its fulfillment did not happen, for hundred of years, gay boy, which explains why you refuse to address my question, that I've asked for years, as to when the cited passages were written, and when fulfilled.

And "land," does not mean "land," and the weasel cries, wimpers:

"you claim all these phrases mean something completely different"


Pitiful, on pot, demonic little arms Craigie.


Peter said it was "the last days",


Isaiah 2:2

And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.And it shall come to pass in the last days,that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains,and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 3 And many people shall go and say,
Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob;and he will teach us of his ways,and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law,
and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. 4 And he shall judge among the nations,and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.


Micah 4 KJV

1 But in the last days it shall come to pass,that the mountain of the house of the Lord
shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills;
and people shall flow unto it. 2 And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths:for the law shall go forth of Zion,and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. 3 And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off;
and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks:
nation shall not lift up a sword against nation,neither shall they learn war any more.





Acts 2:17 KJV

And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:


Vs.


2 Timothy 3 KJV

1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. 6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.


Craigie: It says the same thing...It does not matter...The laws is going forth from the third heaven today, as there are nations, judgment, in the third heaven....There are perilous times in the last days of the third heaven....Darby....You are in denial...Fulfilled AD 70...


You pathetic looking, and posting, clown, charlatan, little arms, greasy weasel, mystic, Buddhist..........






______________

Little arms Craigie:Identify this "everyone" that allegedly saw this alleged Saviour, who was "un physical," return, you fraud, as you've been asked, for 3 years.


Now.

Let me guess: you redefined the meaning of "everyone."


What's the problem, you wimpy, little arms weasel, greasy mess? Scrambling to your "fallable men" teachers, such as Christ rejecting Flavey Joe Josephus, or thief Hankie Hanegraaf, or water baptismal regenerationists, Max King, and J. Stuart Russell, from whom you plagiarize this "AD 70-sm" "invention, since it is certainly not in the bible, and you did not learn it, on your own, which you admit, on record.
 
Last edited:

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Daniel's 70 weeks prove the Darby followers claim regarding the Second Temple wrong.

(Dan 9:25) Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One,

(Dan 9:26) ...The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary...


In the above passage, Daniel is speaking of the same city and the same temple.

Yet, Darby followers claim the temple in verse 26 is a future temple that hasn't been built yet.

Also, Darby followers want people to believe that Daniel never said a peep about the Second Temple, the one Jesus, Peter, Paul, John, and all the men of the NT visited.

Darby followers are a mess.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
You guys have posted something on the order of 300 posts on this thread in the last 24 hours!

I can't keep up!

What the heck do you guys do for a living?

Well, Craigie Tellalie is on TOL, 16 hours/day, satisfying his obsession, and is unemployed, an infidel, according to Paul.
 

Danoh

New member
Daniel's 70 weeks prove the Darby followers claim regarding the Second Temple wrong.

(Dan 9:25) Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One,

(Dan 9:26) ...The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary...


In the above passage, Daniel is speaking of the same city and the same temple.

Yet, Darby followers claim the temple in verse 26 is a future temple that hasn't been built yet.

Also, Darby followers want people to believe that Daniel never said a peep about the Second Temple, the one Jesus, Peter, Paul, John, and all the men of the NT visited.

Darby followers are a mess.

Using your same fool illogic, Tet - "Where in" Scripture is "70AD" specifically mentioned (in the exact phrase "70AD")?
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
Daniel's 70 weeks prove the Darby followers claim regarding the Second Temple wrong.

(Dan 9:25) Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One,

(Dan 9:26) ...The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary...


In the above passage, Daniel is speaking of the same city and the same temple.

Yet, Darby followers claim the temple in verse 26 is a future temple that hasn't been built yet.

Also, Darby followers want people to believe that Daniel never said a peep about the Second Temple, the one Jesus, Peter, Paul, John, and all the men of the NT visited.


The above is plagiarized, from Ken Gentry.


Why do you follow the teachings of fallable men, such as Gentry,Josephus, weasel boy?


Not a peep.

Darby followers are a mess.

I warned you to stop imitating me, with your "mess" reference, which you took from me, loser, Josephus follower.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
"Where in" Scripture is "70AD" specifically mentioned (in the exact phrase "70AD")?

Your question has absolutely nothing to do with Dan 9:25-26

Dan 9:25-26 tells of the Jews rebuilding the city and temple, and then the same city and temple are destroyed.

Dan 9:25-26 proves you wrong.

You claim the city and temple that were rebuilt in verse 25, has nothing to do with the temple and city that are destroyed in verse 26.
 

Danoh

New member
Your question has absolutely nothing to do with Dan 9:25-26

Dan 9:25-26 tells of the Jews rebuilding the city and temple, and then the same city and temple are destroyed.

Dan 9:25-26 proves you wrong.

You claim the city and temple that were rebuilt in verse 25, has nothing to do with the temple and city that are destroyed in verse 26.

Knucklehead, I was using your same fool illogic :chuckle:
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
Using your same fool illogic, Tet - "Where in" Scripture is "70AD" specifically mentioned (in the exact phrase "70AD")?

Yes, Craigie-chapter, verse. Who taught you that-it is certainly not in the bible?


Josephus? Russell? Gentry? Hanegraaf? Wikipedia? "Fallable" men?
 
Top