So receiving an organization's newsletter equates to "reading extensively on them?"
But but but GFR7/Scot, if you'd "read extensively on them", you would have seen the personal testimonies from ex homosexuals showing that they (NARTH) and other organizations that deal with same sex attractions have made a HUGE difference, hence the reason LGBTQUEER organizations HATE them like they do.
I always look forward to your commentaries on juxtapositions (and nothing more) GFR7/Scot, truly I do.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Who on earth is "happy" to engage in an absolutely filthy sexual behavior that produces nothing but all kinds of misery? As you're well aware, many of the people who engage in homosexual behavior were severely damaged by a homosexual elder as a child, and really don't know the happiness that God's design for human sexuality brings.
You've spent countless hours around proud and unrepentant homosexuals GFR7/Scot, and even was paid to write for a homosexual publication. Without a doubt you have some insight as to why someone who engages in such an absolutely filthy behavior, one that causes disease and often times early death and as shown in my posts is an extremely violent culture, so I'm asking you once again:
Who on earth is "happy" to engage in an absolutely filthy sexual behavior that produces nothing but all kinds of misery?
I deal with sociopaths and psychopaths on a daily basis GFR7/Scot, and the one thing they have in common is that they're all pathological liars. Like you, I really do enjoy catching them in bold faced lies.
I know that you're the expert on reparative therapy here GFR7/Scot, as you've "read extensively on them" (i.e. the NARTH newsletter years ago). My question again is this:
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
The criminal justice system often forces people who are drug addicts and alcoholics to attend counseling (and without a doubt many don't want to), why would it be unreasonable to require those who are caught engaging in acts of buggery to do so as well?
(My my, after a night of hard drinking/drugs, someone is very irritable this morning).
aCultureWarrior said:
So receiving an organization's newsletter equates to "reading extensively on them?"
I did read extensively
on NARTH and their articles years ago. (
you first class idiot! 
)
I know I had gotten books out from the library, where we were living at the time;
there were theories about NARTH's future , written by sociologists.
(I cannot recall all the titles of those books now;
many of them were written in the period of 1997 - 2004).
Yes, I would call that "reading extensively" on NARTH;
it's a lot more than your average person would do - idjut.
I was researching them; not just getting their newsletter, IDJUT!!
Then I gave up.
Yes, I've read the testimonials.
Have you read the counter-testimonials?
And the opposing literature?
And the discourse which led to legislative bans? :think:
Please recall my interest is in what will turn the tide culturally and politically:
When I saw NARTH was not a vehicle for real change, I lost interest.
Although there IS one author who predicted NARTH's "coming out of the closet" in the future.
Of course , he was writing in the early 2000s so it's already been nearly a decade and a half.
See why I lost interest in NARTH? :chuckle:
(
Whispered to aCW:
You're not good at catching people out in lies at all, btw.
You're always, always barking up the wrong tree. :chuckle:)
If you wanted a recriminalization campaign, you ought to have waged it in the late '70s and '80s, when the de-criminalization had occurred, and the clubbing scene and AIDS were rampant.
You've waited until :
- they have a huge, well-funded PAC which has gained entrance and approval within the public school system and the Universities; when they have made enormous strides within the federal and supreme court system;
- when legislation has favored them nation-wide and globally;
- when ex-gay therapies are being made illegal for minors in many states;
- when the churches are flinging open their doors to them, and the Universities are catering to them in ways that would have been unthinkable in the 1980s;
- when same sex marriage has become widely embraced and accepted and legalized, and when the AIDS epidemic has abated from it's 1980s horror plague status, and drugs such as prEP are being hailed as a preventative miracle and health care providers are scrambling to sign onto it.
You laughed at my idea that the rainbow craze may collapse of its own weight and diminish to nothing like the disco era did; but this stands a hell of a lot better chance than your tardy, tardy recriminalization campaign. Brilliant, just brilliant. :loser::third:
