This verse may explain TetTroll? 2 Timothy 3:7 "Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth."
ECT What is Preterism
- Thread starter Bright Raven
- Start date
Don't tell James 2:3 KJV boy Craigie, the little wimp.
And quit sending me those PM's, propositioning me, little arms weakling.
I first heard the Gospel in 1962. I believe that same Gospel in 2016. It's the one and only true word of God. MAD fits perfectly into that truth.
I'm don't doubt you feel that way, but feelings aren't facts.
Like I said, I would suggest learning Historicism and Preterism (assuming you already know Dispensationalism).
Your little arms are just 4 inches in circumference. Pathetic,Craigie.
I see why TetTroll cannot give a Testimony of his faith, due to the fact he's so involved with false doctrine. Those two don't fit together. He is a "Divider."
TeT, do the Gospel of Truth a favor and don't attempt to lead others to Christ. You'll only succeed in confusing them.
TeTs false beliefs hinder his ability to spread the truth of the Gospel.
I don't wish to mix water with oil.
"But Darby followers are saved..."-Craigie
Little arms, wimpie Craigie, on records, asserts that one can:
-"slap Christ," thus asserting that his work is not good enough, and continue to assert that, til death, and...
-teach anti-Christ doctrine(as he accused Tam of, and others).
And still, they are saved.
On record.
Ask him. If he denies it, I will provide the quotes.
He is a perverter of the gospel of Christ, a spineless wimp, with no backbone, only here, to cause division, among the boc(which excludes him), per his daddy devil's orders.
Ask him.
Right, little arms devil boy?
Last edited:
By the way TeT, Christ died for the sins of ALL Humanity, However, only those who hear the Gospel and place ALL their faith in Christ as their Savior will reap the benefits.
Then why do Darby followers claim that God will require animal sacrifices for sin atonement in the future?
I agree with you that Christ Jesus died for ALL sins of ALL humanity. However, that's not what Dispensationalism teaches.
That has been addressed by many, you deceitful punk.
Why did you bale from Hilston debate, when he addressed that question, numerous times with you,little weakling Craigie, as you kept bringing it up, punk, lying to him, asserting the same thing, i.e., "Hilston, why can't you answer my questions on the animal sacrifices....wine.....!!!????", when he did answer it, numerous times?
The answer: No answer will satisfy you, punk, and then you just cry, "No one answers my questions!!!!!!Wah Wah Wah.................................!!!"
Why did you bale from that debate, punk?
Rhetorical Q- He pummeled you, picked you apart, and also on your "Darby followers claim that God will require animal sacrifices for sin atonement in the future?" spam.
Why do you Russell, Josephus followers claim that you can be anti Christ, deny the Lord Jesus Christ's work, until you die, and still be saved?
musterion
Well-known member
To the bat poles.....
Animals never died to atone for sin...and never will.
That's my point steko.
Why in the world, after what Christ Jesus accomplished on the cross, would God require people to make animal sacrifices for sin?
According to your Dispensationalism, the following verse applies to the yet future:
(Ezekiel 40:39 KJV) And in the porch of the gate were two tables on this side, and two tables on that side, to slay thereon the burnt offering and the sin offering and the trespass offering.
Why would God require a sin offering after what Christ Jesus accomplished on the cross?
I guess, you'll never know.
No, I do know.
There isn't going to be animal sacrifices for sin in the future.
That's because the Lord Jesus Christ made a one time sacrifice for ALL sin for ALL time.
One of the biggest fundamental flaws of Dispensationalism is the claim that animal sacrifices for sin will be required by God in the future.
