Sitamun
New member
Really? Is that what you're bringing to support your view? Now I'll give you a minute to think about this one. Here's a hint, are you sure it's a middle name?
Trump Makes His Way Back to the Lead in Poll
- Thread starter Catholic Crusader
- Start date
Really? Is that what you're bringing to support your view? Now I'll give you a minute to think about this one. Here's a hint, are you sure it's a middle name?
Read an article the other day that claimed 1/3 of Americans would seriously consider an independent candidate and party at this point. If this is the best the two party system can produce it's time to try that movement again.Good news is I saw a few independent candidates making up some ground. I haven't had much time to look into them though. Heck, I don't even remember their names.
Saw your latest with CC.
That's CC all over. Deep seated intellectual insecurities that will absolutely surface in any conversation where she's contradicted using objective data and/or met with a reasoned counter.
Too frequently, you could distill her hostile lamentations to this sort of thing:
It's impossible to not talk down to someone lying in a gutter, argumentatively. Or, she's her own worst enemy and best rebuttal, really.
lain:
Last edited:
Quetzal
New member
I have said it once, and I will say it again: a moderate republican that expands their understanding of social justice and inequality would run away with this election.
Par for the course given where we are.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
better than "hussein" :idunno:
Its just as good as your dumb income tax snivelling.
LOL. You're such a pinhead. Let me tell you something: Abraham Lincoln had common sense, a sharp wit, and a grounded sense of right and wrong. He was not, however, an intellectual. He learned law without going to school. I admire him greatly.
Its worms like you who use their faux-intellectualism to find ways to justify vile evils. Many leftwing extremists consider themselves to be, and are considered to be, intellectuals. They are lower than dirt. That's your ilk.
I'll take honest Abe and his morals and sense of God & country over you perverse wannabe-intellectuals any day of the week.
You did it again.
Let me educate you: that's how most lawyers managed it in his day and position, with an apprenticeship and individual study. He was learned in the law, an avid reader and thinker, aka, an intellectual.
You attempt to elevate your misconception of Lincoln because then you don't have to fail an objective litmus, don't have to worry about the thing that appears to gnaw at you and you're free to think and inferentially declare yourself the equal or better of those who have more than their self-generated opinion.
It's really something to watch you go. Also, what evils? Or is that just more of the same declarative, untethered nonsense?
I'm sure many are, though it really isn't about what you think of yourself. It's also not about whether you're a capitalist or a communist. Both have had their share.
Which, were it true, would still give you the problem I noted with your "moron" business.
But given I'm neither leftist nor communist, you've got more troubles than an Amish man or woman at the Moulin Rouge.Except you're not really talking about Abe and you're not in a position to gauge intellectualism. No, you're really talking about you, and that's the sad heart of this this. You, who are the fit judge of who is or isn't something you can lay no objective claim to being...remarkable really.
Last edited:
Why am I certain CC has an issue with intelligence? A sampling from today's posts:
As for polls and Trump of late:
The Aug. 18-22 poll showed that 45 percent of voters supported Clinton, while 33 percent backedTrump ahead of the Nov. 8 election.
As for polls and Trump of late:
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton leadsRepublican rival Donald Trump by 12 percentage points among likely voters, her strongest showing this month, according to a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll released on Tuesday.
The Aug. 18-22 poll showed that 45 percent of voters supported Clinton, while 33 percent backedTrump ahead of the Nov. 8 election.
Wow. Your lacey pink panties got that wadded up, that you had to research every snarky comment I've made lately? Grow a pair, loser.
I know, right? I saw you doing the same thing to a couple of others and thought the trend would be easy enough to find. . . find, it was in almost every post in the day.
Remarkable.
Ah, an internet tough guy. Well, that's almost as impressive as actual courage.
Nope. Supra. I just did a quick search on today and it was harder to find something else. You are self-evidently consumed with the consideration and I've stated why I think that is.
Grow up, kid (well, let's hope that's the reason).
On the upside, at least a post associated with you had the word reason in it. :think: So that's a move in the right direction.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-exclusive-idUSKCN10Z2MO
:mock: Trump
:mock: Trumpers
Not that I put much stock in polling right now. At least wait until the first debate.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
no kidding - we have longer to go before voting than the whole canadian process took last year
Quetzal
New member
The irony burns.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
suckup
No, let me educate you: You are a fool and a liar, who uses his intelligence to promote lies and justify evils. You're nothing. I'll say it again:
Abraham Lincoln had common sense, a sharp wit, and a grounded sense of right and wrong. He was not, however, an intellectual. He learned law without going to school. I admire him greatly.
Its worms like you who use their faux-intellectualism to find ways to justify vile evils. Many leftwing extremists consider themselves to be, and are considered to be, intellectuals. They are lower than dirt. That's your ilk.
I'll take honest Abe and his morals and sense of God & country over you perverse wannabe-intellectuals any day of the week.
And I'll repeat one other thing again: Grow a pair, loser.
You can't give what you don't demonstrably possess, but it's game of you to make the attempt. :thumb:
Now do something that really shows that superiority you're shooting for. Wow me with argument, stun me with illustration, flabbergast me with depths of objective data and keen analysis.
Or you could just do that.
lain: Anyone can. It only takes wind, fingertips and a lack of upbringing.Don't sell yourself short, you'll say it dozens of times, the alternative being you'd have to come up with something substantive in rebuttal.
Yes yes yes, chop chop chop... ...the only way you can deal with me is slice and dice my posts. You can't handle the cold hard truth all in one gulp, that your a pathetic liar who embraces both stupid and evil ideas, then tries to justify them with your faux-intellectualism. The man voted for Obama folks, what more proof do you need of his LACK of intelligence? Go grow a pair then talk to me when you actually a man.
This is for Arthur Brain and the other Limey guy