toldailytopic: Same-sex marriage: for it, or against it?
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
- Status
you can start here
Laws against rape, murder, theft, abuse also cannot be *reasonably* enforced.
So once again, being that you are the person who is advocating that the only reason to allow individuals to marry is to have children, you should have a a solution on how to make sure each and every individual applying for a marriage license is capable of reproducing.
BTW, a solution does not include disallowing a freedom to homosexuals that heterosexuals have been granted for years.
Chrys ... SH is correct, so why aren't you willing to advocate that all couples be tested for fertility IF you believe that is the only reason for marriage?
According to your standard, only those who wish to marry.
marriage is not what it use to be
abortion, divorce and the two income family has made it almost meaningless
but
we should still take a look at what it once was
a man and a woman would vow to stay together no matter what
they would have children and the mother would stay home to care for them
the mother was dependent on the father and relied on his promise not to leave so she would be taken care of later on in life
this is the way it should be
many here do not understand that
they have been raised in a world where it is okay to kill your baby
where it is okay to get a divorce no matter how much the children suffer
where it is okay to drop your kids off at a day care center
where it is okay to leave your kids home alone
I do not believe it is okay
abortion, divorce and the two income family has made it almost meaningless
but
we should still take a look at what it once was
a man and a woman would vow to stay together no matter what
they would have children and the mother would stay home to care for them
the mother was dependent on the father and relied on his promise not to leave so she would be taken care of later on in life
this is the way it should be
many here do not understand that
they have been raised in a world where it is okay to kill your baby
where it is okay to get a divorce no matter how much the children suffer
where it is okay to drop your kids off at a day care center
where it is okay to leave your kids home alone
I do not believe it is okay
MrRadish
New member
it follows from
Rubbish. I value my marriage and it's far from meaningless. You aren't married are you?
No matter what shouldn't cover domestic violence or habitual substance abuse and the like... People still exchange those same vows and many keep them. As to the home life, once a provider could work a full week and provide sufficiently for his family. It's less likely than hitting the lottery for many these days.
Now my father was involved in business and my mother was a teacher and then a professor. As with many in their position and from their tradition a nanny was engaged to see to my brother and I for a portion of any day. Both of us ended up well adjusted and successful men with good families of our own. I think the model isn't unimportant and there are advantages to have or miss, but the attention and love and direction within any approach is even more important.
How do you feel about women voting?
You mean swallow. I think everyone understands you better and better.
A human tragedy.
It's legal, to be sure, and it is even preferable in certain circumstances. But I don't know anyone who has had one who thinks of it trivially, which is what the off-handed 'okay' insinuates--a degree of disinterested ease and ill consideration. I'm sure some do manage that, but that's people for you. Some will think darn near anything you can imagine.
It's necessary for many. And given your party allegiance I'm surprised you're disturbed by this. The big business interests they shelter have undone the ability of many to enjoy that scenario you support had they the interest in doing so.
It's not only not okay, it's criminal, depending.
And, depending on the posit, many here who find your position on the OP without merit and purely a reflection of your religion would agree here and there. Mixing them together in an unjustified all or nothing gambit isn't reasonable.
Silent Hunter
Well-known member
:BRAVO:
Nor what it should be ...
Abortion has nothing to do with marriage. Divorce and two family incomes are, in many cases, a necessity.
No thank you, I prefer the light. However, feel free to step back into the Dark Ages.
That STILL happens. Just ask Phil Hartman and Nancy Benoit and her son. Oh wait, you can't.
Why the mother? There are many wonderful stay at home dads. Also, being that you are so opposed to the unions that allow for individuals to be paid higher wages and receive better benefits, what would you tell the *man* whose salary isn't sufficient enough to put food on the table, pay the bills, mortgage, health insurance, etc.?
NO NO and NOOOO! Women should never be taught that they should depend on men to keep them safe and taken care of. It is in the best interest of women to be brought up to learn to trust and take care of themselves. Apparently, you NEED for women to dependent on men.
We understand quite clearly that you are misogynist who holds women in low regard.
And then there are some such as yourself whose concern for the unborn baby does not include the mother and stops immediately UPON birth.
You are also incapable of understanding that in many cases daycare or babysitting is a NECESSITY for a family to survive financially.
Yea, whatever. There are other individuals who value women and children enough to understand ...
That women should be encouraged to have enough skill to contribute to financially to their family should it be necessary
That women should be prepared and capable of taking care of themselves and the children WITHOUT depending on a spouse
That women (and men) should NEVER allow themselves to be emotionally, physically or financially abused
The very fact that expect women and children to live in conditions that have the potential of being emotional, financial or physical threats to their lives says quite a lot about YOU.
What mother and what child?
Silent Hunter
Well-known member
:BRAVO:
I can see it is Rusha's job to protect the adults
so who protects the children?
so who protects the children?
Adults DO need to be encouraged and able to protect themselves. Oh wait, what Chrys REALLY meant to say is "I can see Rusha wants women and children to receive as much protection and consideration as MEN".
Not you. Your only interest is in protecting the interest of Catholic, Republican men.
now we know what is really bothering you
The type of misogyny and disregard that you display towards women and children should bother anyone with common sense.
And you. It's called an argument.
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
- Status