Is the Trinity biblical?
Is the Trinity taught in the Bible?
No and no.
http://www.biblecenter.de/bibliothek/baixeras/apatrist1.htm
Is the Trinity biblical?
Is the Trinity taught in the Bible?
We must first remember that very few have a good idea of what the Trinity is in the first place - hence, accuracy in definition will be very important. The doctrine of the Trinity is simply that there is one eternal being of God - indivisible, infinite.This one being of God is shared by three co-equal, co-eternal persons, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit.
It is necessary here to distinguish between the terms"being" and "person." It would be a contradiction, obviously, to say that there are three beings within one being, or three persons within one person. So what is the difference? We clearly recognize the difference between being and person every day. We recognize what something is,yet we also recognize individuals within a classification. For example, we speak of the "being" of man---human being. A rock has "being"---the being of a rock, as does a cat, a dog, etc. Yet, we also know that there are personal attributes as well. That is, we recognize both "what"and "who" when we talk about a person.
The Bible tells us there are three classifications of personal beings---God, man, and angels. What is personality? The ability to have emotion, will, to express oneself. Rocks cannot speak.Cats cannot think of themselves over against others, and, say,work for the common good of "cat kind." Hence, we are saying that there is one eternal, infinite being of God, shared fully and completely by three persons, Father, Son and Spirit.One what, three who's.
The three Biblical doctrines that flow directly into the river that is the Trinity are as follows:
1) There is one and only one God, eternal,immutable.
2) There are three eternal Persons described in Scripture -the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. These Persons are never identified with one another - that is, they are carefully differentiated as Persons.
3) The Father, the Son, and the Spirit, are identified as being fully deity---that is, the Bible teaches the Deity of Christ and the Deity of the Holy Spirit.
So I thought it might be useful to try to get a definition for Trinity again. Using Google, one of the first entries that pops up is from James White (he seems to be the modern-day specialist on this subject):
http://vintage.aomin.org/trinitydef.html
Could someone provide an interpretation of what James White just said here? If a rock has being, but there are many individual rocks, and a cat has a cat being, but there are many individual cats, then there are "human beings" and many individual humans... then he is saying there are three individuals in the "God" being? Is he just using "being" like the way we use "species?"
But of the "human being" I would say that "we are many" and there are many humans. This would be well understood. Under the same theme that he describes, one would also say there were three Gods. He is very emphatic that these three individuals (of the God being, just like we have a rock being, a cat being, and a human being) and that these are in no way the same person.
Does anyone understand what James White is saying here? He is by no means a hostile witness, but using his definitions, if I were to use a death ray machine and kill everyone on this planet except myself, my wife, and my daughter, we would then be a Trinity. One Human (one in being) but three distinct individuals, not the same as the others. "One what, and three who's" and all we would be lacking is eternal life. But otherwise we would be a Trinity of Father, Mother, and Daughter.
... and before someone gets upset at me for suggesting this, I am just trying to understand what James White has written,and thus I only use this for example. I don't see how what he describes is any different from someone that says there are three Gods.
Is James White correctly representing the Trinity doctrine?
Good postThe answer to your question, yes. If you do not believe in the trinity that is your loss. It means that you do not have a true understanding of the nature of God. Do you deny the existence of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit?
And that's why God wants our flesh dead and his son living through us, because he wants to see the life of his son being lived out in his children
I haven't rejected Jesus Christ at all, I love him from the depths of my heart, and I have complete faith in him.
I sorry, I thanked this by accident
Wrong and wrong!
Jesus, is a unitarian.
Joh 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
1Co 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
Deu 6:4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:
Deu 6:5 And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.
Deu 6:6 And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart:
Deu 6:7 And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
Deu 6:8 And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes.
Deu 6:9 And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.
Mar 12:28 And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
Mar 12:29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
Mar 12:30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
Mar 12:31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
Mar 12:32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: Mar 12:33 And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
Mar 12:34 And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.
LA
What kind of dope have you been smoking?
John 3:16 American Standard Version (ASV)
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have eternal life.
Not quite unitarian.
The answer to your question, yes. If you do not believe in the trinity that is your loss. It means that you do not have a true understanding of the nature of God. Do you deny the existence of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit?
But you do not love His work from the depths of your heart and you have no faith that He completed the mission commissioned to Him, which was to provide the PERFECT SACRIFICE so that you can be forgiven your sin because ONLY His blood can cover your sin.
If you separate Jesus from His finished work then you have rejected God's only prescribed order of victory.
One's eternal destination is at stake here. You get Jesus Christ wrong, it matters not what else you get right. You got Jesus and His mission wrong.
I will answer your question, but you must then answer my question. Is that fair?
That's a new phrase for me, so I would consider what passages might reflect on that statement one way or the other.
Although I think that saying may not be perfectly accurate, I think I understand what is meant and why it would be said. Jesus said that the Father was in him, that he and the Father were one, and if you had seen him you had seen the Father. Yet I don't think it is correct to say that the Father lacked "body" ... so change that to be "The Son is the Father in the flesh" and that starts to seem accurate indeed.
So even though you seemed a bit upset with me, I answered your question. Please answer this question before replying further.
Question: We know that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, but which member of the Trinity was the divine parent? Please bear in mind that according to Trinity definition, the Father is NOT the Son, nor the Son the Spirit, nor the Spirit the Father.
a) Joseph, a man
b) God the Father
c) God the Holy Spirit
d) God the Son
Jesus taught the worship of one God, the Father.
Unitarianism teaches the same.
.
They are not Oneness (Modelism) as you seem to think they are
LA
Matthew 28:19 KJVDo you believe in the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Who is the Son? Who is the Holy Ghost? Do you have an answer?
Matthew 28:19 KJV
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Acts 2:38 KJV
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Looks to me that Peter and the apostles knew the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. They said his name was Jesus.
Acts 8:16 KJV
(For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
It does?No! That is oneness pentecostal teaching. Scripture is clear and makes distinctions between the three.
It does?
I don't see any distinction made in your passage. What about here?Yes it does.
2 Timothy 2:15 New King James Version (NKJV)
15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.oly:
Bright Raven, can you tell me which gospel is correct and which is in error? Was it the Father or the Holy Ghost that impregnated Mary? You are pretty adamant that scripture makes clear distinctions so can you please tell me which gospel we can trust? Matthew or John?I will answer your question, but you must then answer my question. Is that fair?
That's a new phrase for me, so I would consider what passages might reflect on that statement one way or the other.
Although I think that saying may not be perfectly accurate, I think I understand what is meant and why it would be said. Jesus said that the Father was in him, that he and the Father were one, and if you had seen him you had seen the Father. Yet I don't think it is correct to say that the Father lacked "body" ... so change that to be "The Son is the Father in the flesh" and that starts to seem accurate indeed.
So even though you seemed a bit upset with me, I answered your question. Please answer this question before replying further.
Question: We know that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, but which member of the Trinity was the divine parent? Please bear in mind that according to Trinity definition, the Father is NOT the Son, nor the Son the Spirit, nor the Spirit the Father.
a) Joseph, a man
b) God the Father
c) God the Holy Spirit
d) God the Son