He is not clear to you because your mind is as muddy as the Mississippi River.
The Trinity
- Thread starter Bright Raven
- Start date
He is not clear to you because your mind is as muddy as the Mississippi River.
Fraud, or drunk. You not only repeated "Omniscience," you "argued", on record, since the word "trinity," is not in the bible, it is false dotrine. "Omniscience,omnipotense, omnipresence," might be "traits," thus doctrine, teachings, "describing" the LORD God of the bible, but these words omniscience,omnipotent, omniscience, are not in the bible.
Thus, you, on record, asert that the LORD God is not omniscient, is not omnipresent, is not omnipotent.
Go ahead-show us the words "omniscience, "omnipotent," "omnipresent," in the bible. If not, you are on record, as asserting that that God is not "omniscient, infinite knowledge... Omnipotent; infinite power... Omnipresent; present everywhere..."(your words), per your "argument."
Bee1
New member
Why do you say your God Jesus . You have God and you have Jesus. Jesus is not a God. Statements like that is what causes controversy. Jesus never called himself God. Jesus may be called Godly but not God. God is a jealous God put no one before him.
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Bee1
New member
I was giving the definition for those words that someone ask me. Keep track if you are going to comment.
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Titus 2:13 Amplified Bible (AMP)
13 awaiting and confidently expecting the [fulfillment of our] blessed hope and the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,
Fraud, deception. No, you not only repeated "Omniscience," you "argued", on record, since the word "trinity," is not in the bible, it is false doctrine. "Omniscience,omnipotense, omnipresence," might be "traits," thus doctrine, teachings, "describing" the LORD God of the bible, but these words omniscience,omnipotent, omniscience, are not in the bible.
Thus, you, on record, assert that the LORD God is not omniscient, is not omnipresent, is not omnipotent.
Go ahead-show us the words "omniscience, "omnipotent," "omnipresent," in the bible. If not, you are on record, as asserting that that God is not "omniscient, infinite knowledge... Omnipotent; infinite power... Omnipresent; present everywhere..."(your words), per your "argument."
Bee1
New member
How do you change the word traits to doctrine? Someone has me what these words mean and I gave the definition. I never said these words where in or out of the Bible, I said these could be traits of a God.That it,I did not say God had these traits nor did I say it was doctrine! Omnisciece,omnipotence,omnipresent are traits that could describe a God.That what I said then that what I'm saying now.
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Apple7
New member
He most certainly did, as thus...
ο νικων κληρονομησει ταυτα και εσομαι αυτω θεος και αυτος εσται μοι υιος
keypurr
Well-known member
You have spelled it wrong, you got worms in your Apple.
Apple7
New member
Show us...
lifeisgood
New member
Neither is anyone talking about 'traits' that could be of a god but 'words' that are or are not in the Bible (which, BTW, is also not in the Bible either).
This back and forth started with the word "trinity" is not in the Bible, then, the continuation was show me where "omniscience", "omnipotence", "omnipresent" is in the Bible or even the word "Bible". You, changed the goal post by saying that a god could have these traits.
Well, 'traits' of a god is not what started your back and forth.
lifeisgood
New member
You, keypurr, being that you are the expert in Greek, why did you not show where the spell error was so that all could see your Greek expertise.
Right Divider
Body part
Because he's a poser.
Bee1
New member
This is the original question to me from john w;
Find the word "Bible," in the scripture.
Does the LORD God have omniscience? Is he omnipotent?Is he omnipresent?
Please provide proof, if your answer is "yes.
Now, these was a question address to me, which I answered. Where did I say these words were in/out of Bible. I think this is a tactic you use to try to confuse the issue. Read the first thread before you criticize.
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
God is omniscient, in that He can know everything that He wants to know that can be known. He cannot know that which cannot be known.
God is omnipotent, in that He has all power that he has not delegated to some authorities.
God is omnipresent, in that He can be anywhere He wants to be. He cannot be forced to be somewhere He doesn't want to be, like in Hell for all of eternity.
That's called moving the goalposts, Bee. It's a logical fallacy.
You accuse us trinitarians of teaching a word that doesn't exist in the Bible, then you yourself bring up the word's omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence, which are themselves not in the Bible, and claim that the Bible teaches them.
It's hypocritical, Bee, and John was calling you out on your hypocrisy.
And so am I.
"Trinity" is not in the Bible, nor are the Omni-s. Yet the doctrines can be taught (insofar as they are taught in the Bible).
Bee1
New member
Again I did not bring up the words omniscient...... What is wrong with you people on this thread. I just show the the question that includes these words and I gave the definition and my thoughts as the answer. I never said or asked were these words in/out of Bible. I moving on to the next thread of interest.
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Observe, the deception, spin, side stepping, backtracking. Doctrine, moron, merely means "teaching." I know that's quite deep....Take a deep breath. Thus, when the bible discusses the traits of the LORD God, discusses His attributes, His character, it is teaching about Him-doctrine. So, stuff your sophistry.
Now-go ahead-show us the words "omniscience, "omnipotent," "omnipresent," in the bible. If not, you are on record, as asserting that that God is not "omniscient, infinite knowledge... Omnipotent; infinite power... Omnipresent; present everywhere..."(your words), per your "argument."
lifeisgood
New member
You very well know that the conversation was about 'words' in or not in the Bible (BTW which is not in the Bible either). Nothing about 'traits of a god' as you asserted.
The question was "show the words 'trinity', 'omniscience', 'omnipotent', 'omnipresent', etc. in the Bible", and you know it so well, you had to change the goal post.
Correctamundo, LIG-it's also called the "Bait and Switch," the Create A Moving Target" technique, i.e., if your argument, premise("supporting walls")is being picked apart, repeatedly, it is because you are staying on one topic too long. In this situation, it is always a good idea to move the goal posts, create a moving target,in hopes that your opponents forget what your initial argument was, and change subjects, pretend that your opponent has denied (fill in the blank), and act outraged, crying, "heresy!!!" Catholics have perfected this technique with their "perpetual virginity" scam.
Yepers.