No idea why you'd think that, but it doesn't frame what I wrote.
It's real easy to do a lot of things, like handcuff a kid with a clock. A clock, not a bomb or a gun or a knife. A kid showing that clock off, not running through the halls declaring jihad or secreting it in a locker or outside the principle's office while glancing furtively about.
But there's nothing dishonest about what the parents are doing. Not one demonstrable thing.
That's never why one of those is issued though... Because a judge thinks dishonesty is the solution to a problem of honest rendering. And I've literally given you a pretty particular answer on why the parents shouldn't sign off on lifting it.
Okay.
:kookoo:
Can you even spell rational?
lain: Because that's about as far removed from the reasonable truth of anything as you can get without requiring a map to make your way back on any real particular of the conversation. I'm beginning to suspect you could illustrate the Chinese Whispers game/effect in a monologue.
It is truly mind-boggling to me, the degree to which some people will go to maintain their own imagined self-righteousness. Slandering some unknown schoolboy? Heck yeah! As long as he's a Muslim and I can make him look inferior!Can you even spell rational?
I made it. You were...I'm not sure what you were doing with the video bit, but you appeared to be pointedly misrepresenting my part in our recent conversation. Either that or you'd suddenly decided to speak about another lawyer doing something daft, but given our conversation and the inference someone might have drawn it seemed appropriate to at least meet it with an, "If he's talking about me he's off the map" response.
I tended to, outside of simple wills and deeds. Most lawyers charge an hourly rate, unless they're charging a percentage for some sort of serious injury recovery. But that wasn't an area that interested me.
Admirable, but I don't provide the service that the comment you made requires. The people who do will tend to charge an hourly rate though.
lain:
Are you saying your comment about defamation/racism was the result of a serious injury?
It will be, if I find a favorable jury. But that'll be your job.
Maybe. It depends on who around here you believe. If he just threw this thing together overnight then no. If he worked on it and gathered bits for it then yes. That's something you should notice.
That's a neat trick (either).Are you saying your comment about defamation/racism was the result of a serious injury?
It will be, if I find a favorable jury.
:think: I might make an exception, provided a helmet was worn.But that'll be your job.
I didn't say it was. I said he might have said it was, might have thought about it that way. Who knows?
That's you actually asking you the question about what you just did, because I didn't if you can read and you did if anyone else can, just then.
No and I didn't try to, just met assumption with speculation that was a bit more broad, as someone who can reasonably cobble a potential answer to the point. Could also be the father wasn't present when the boy went off to school. Any number of explanations for why dad wouldn't have known or how he could have known.
Because you made a statement you don't know to be true as though it was and I responded with a broader examination.
lain: