ECT Speaking in tongues

Lazy afternoon

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
No.

Show someone in the Old Testament believing that Christ would someday be dying for the sins of the world, be buried, and rise from the dead for the justification of all who believe.

Show those exact specifics being believed the OT and you win.


Gen 3:21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

LA
 

andyc

New member
Its funny to watch people making fun of youtube videos, while having no ability to bring a case in defence of cessationism from scripture.
How about steko?
I see you getting in on the act, but nothing in the way of scriptural content.
 

andyc

New member
The operation of tongues has ceased (1 Corinthians 13:8 KJV) as the scripture saith when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be done away. (1 Corinthians 13:10 KJV). We have that which is perfect in all scripture which throughly furnishes us (2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV). We know this too as Paul was given the dispensation of God to fulfil the word of God (Colossians 1:25 KJV). We know if others are speaking the truth by weighing what they say by the scriptures. That too is how we know you are perpetrating a fabrication. Thou art weighted in the balances and art found wanting.

The only way to be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness (as I believe you are) is to grow up into Him in all things (Ephesians 4:15 KJV)! This requires approving things that are excellent (Philippians 1:9-10 KJV)/rightly dividing the word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15 KJV). When will you grow up?

That which is perfect, is heaven. Which is why Paul said, then we shall know as we are known. This is talking about how we relate to God. In the literal presence of God there will be no need for gifts. Besides, people did not really own bibles until a few centuries ago, so is perfection is the completed canon, it didn't benefit people much for years. Look at the denominations and churches. There seems to be a problem with the way people interpret perfection. And most of you lot dont even go to church.
 

andyc

New member
If that were true, then he would not have said this;

Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those who believe.


Therefore=in conclusion=interpret what I am saying this way

So if Paul said that unbelievers will say that those speaking tongues are out of thier minds, what sign is it supposed to be?
 
Top