Good question. Why are you?
I'm not. The leaders of the Confederacy weren't so muddled about their cause. The states seceded to preserve slavery, and they said so at the time. It's in retrospect that people have tried to make it about other things.
Good question. Why are you?
Good question. Why are you?
I'm not. The leaders of the Confederacy weren't so muddled about their cause. The states seceded to preserve slavery, and they said so at the time. It's in retrospect that people have tried to make it about other things.
History matters, and getting it right matters. I think the more poignant question is, why are there people today trying to make the Civil War about something other than what it was actually about?
Rex, Rex, Rex, (shaking head) you don't even know what the Civil War was about.
Do you agree with Buchanan that blacks are the "real" racists in America?
Do you believe blacks are inherently dangerous, or violent, or pose a menace by nature?
I'm sorry you have problems with actual FBI statistics.
What is it about the Confederate Flag that you love so much?
You are. Neither was Lincoln muddled either. You wanna keep this going, I have all day.
Would you like to say why you think the so called "Union" went to war with a few States that wanted out? Go ahead, please.
Please remember the South wanted OUT of the United States for very real reasons (to them.)
Slavery. If you think it was about something else, I can give you some references for your edification.
Because secession was against the Constitution.
He was against slavery, but only in a fairly moderate way.
Yes that must be it!
Thank goodness you have references!
So brother against brother, East against South because ?
Maybe because the people up East worked children to death and poor immigrants 12 hours a day and buried the abused Chinese a long the way who were used to build the freaking railroad but they just couldn't stand for the blacks whom they loved so much more than the poor they had to be slaves?
He was?
“Free them [blacks] and make them politically and socially our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this . . . . We can not then make them equals.” (CW, Vol. II, p. 256). Hmmm, not racist enough for Rex.
“Senator Douglas remarked . . that . . . this government was made for the white people and not for negroes. Why, in point of mere fact, I think so too.” (CW, Vol. II, p. 281). Hmmm, not racist enough for Rex.
“I meant not to ask for the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia.” (CW, Vol., II, p. 260). Hmmm, not racist enough for Rex.
“I say that we must not interfere with the institution of slavery . . . because the constitution forbids it, and the general welfare does not require us to do so.” (CW, Vol. III, p. 460). Hmmm, not racist enough for Rex.
I could go on and on but well you know, anything Lincoln says is not racist enough for Rex.
Because secession was against the Constitution.
You're moving the goalposts. I said he was against slavery, not that he wasn't racist.