glassjester
Well-known member
Coming from a guy who thinks folk can fall in love with a duvet if they 'train' themselves long enough to that's...well it's actually just sad.
Link to article - Man Marries Pillow
Coming from a guy who thinks folk can fall in love with a duvet if they 'train' themselves long enough to that's...well it's actually just sad.
Link to article - Man Marries Pillow
The story is click bait. There is no reason to believe it is true at all.
That was not, of course, a genuine story. Saying you are married and had a ceremony doesn't mean the marriage wasn't imaginary.
:doh:
But, religion is another realm and the Law must not intrude!
If Law over-rides religion we then have de facto Communism.
I do believe that is what is happening here.
We are in trouble.
Being born a sinner which doesn't allow for being born gay is meaningless. It ain't fringe. It is the basic meaning of being born a sinner and you brought up the mother made me gay by doting. Doting wasn't the cause.
What is sin? If it is a sin I can be born that way.
Your mother loves you too much and the extra unbalanced emotional love energy made you gay. If you want to be in true nature, you must balance your energies back into the natural frequencies that makes men bounce back to the natural heterosexual, the built-in natural desire .
I haven't seen any provision whereby religion does get overridden. The legal changes are solely for civil weddings and civil recognition.
"Balance your energies back to the natural frequencies?"
This sounds like it might require crystals.
Actually it is, when you go into a voting booth. If you vote, for example, for candidates who propose passing laws that promote your religious moral codes, you are encouraging theocracy. Whereas if you vote for candidates that propose passing laws that support the individual's right to make their own moral decisions, you are encouraging individual freedom through secular government. In either instance, you are free, yourself, to follow your own religious moral code. But only in the latter instance are you proposing that others have that same freedom.Right. And that's the best any government can do. The other two branches of morality are outside the jurisdiction of any government. This is where family, religion, and individuals can do what governments can't.
I don't propose anything instead. Thankfully, that's not my call to make.
What is and isn't a "sin" seems to reside in the eyes of those doing the judging. And in my opinion, there is not one of us equipped to be judging or condemning anyone. Not even ourselves. "Sinfulness" is far too complex and variable for us to ever assess accurately. (This is what I mean by saying that the foundation of truth and wisdom is honesty and humility.) How can I know to what degree someone else is being driven to lust or violence by a genetic physical condition that they inherited at birth? How can I know to what degree they struggled to overcome it? Of course I don't. And no one else does, either.I don't perceive them doing wrong to others. But is that the only way to sin? By doing wrong to others?
Himself.Who did Adam harm in Eden?
This sounds like it might require crystals.
Well, when one is in the business of selling righteousness to others, one had better be righteous while their doing it.Meanwhile the aberrant members of society are watching the religious members of society under a microscope and will take us apart at the slightest hint of non-compliance.
So be it.
It shall keep us on our toes!
They are natural records of energies and frequencies, growth. In other words you cut an old tree down and learn from the rings of growth. The experts can see climate changes at once while you just see, just a tree. Crystals stored the history of its own long life including fantastic mathematical surprises . It runs your radios so you can hear God sending a big meteorite striaght down over your head while your mocking something useful. Fundies know nothing
"Balance your energies back to the natural frequencies?"
Hahaha hahaha.
:rotfl:
It runs your radios
...Fundies know nothing
You listen on a crystal set?!
Hasn't your local hardware store discovered transistor radios or software-defined-radio receivers yet?
Sounds like when someone arrives in your town they don't turn back their clock, they have to turn back their calendar!
You mean totalitarianism, not communism. The ideal religious community, according the the Bible, is a commune. While what has been called "communism" by Russia and China and various other fascist states around true world was not really communism at all, it was fascist totalitarianism masquerading as communism.If Law over-rides religion we then have de facto Communism.
Actually all that's happened so far, is that religion has been pushed out of lawmaking, to some degree. Which is a good thing. You just refuse to see that religion has always been overstepping it's rightful bounds in this country.I do believe that is what is happening here.
We are in trouble.
You laughs are evidence why you have ailments.
You don't believe in the miracles Jesus performed as all unregenerates do
Don't you laugh for fun then? You don't seem to be enjoying yourself much!
I was born retro-non-re-unregenerated, and I'm proud of it.
In my opinion, yes. The difference is subtle, but real. A sexual desire is low key, along the lines of, "I find that woman attractive." My eyes my linger a bit longer than usual as I find her desirable. But that is all. If I feel lust then my thoughts focus on that person and I will start looking for ways to satisfy that lust with that person.I am not asking you for the difference between homosexual behaviors and heterosexual behaviors.
I'll rephrase my question. Is there a difference between the following two mental states?1. John feels sexual desire toward many different women.2. John feels lust toward many different women.