You may go any second? What's your point? Trying to find someone
to argue with now that GT left the thread? Try someone else.
ECT Rightly Dividing
- Thread starter achduke
- Start date
You may go any second? What's your point? Trying to find someone
to argue with now that GT left the thread? Try someone else.
HisServant
New member
No, just showing you that your eschatology is really quite pointless in the entire scope of the christian life.
You satanically deny the redemption of the body,promised to members of the boc, which, by definition, is physical, and that is because you deny that the Saviour is a man today, not having a flesh and bone body. You thus deny that He is a mediator.
Satanic.
You also deny the future resurrection, which, by definition, is physical, to OT saints.
That is a perversion of the gospel of Christ, and is satanic.
And stuff your satanic spin as to the reasons why you believe such. We've heard it, and it's from the pits of hell, your future residence.
You're a Calvinist and I'm a Grace Message/Paul's Gospel kind of guy.
Never the twain shall meet. Dig?
Spam.
Preterists redefine the terms "land....resurrection....redemption of the body...................................."
Well then, don't just sit there in front of your screen man, get to it. Are
we cool?
HisServant
New member
Doesn't matter in our daily lives.. we are still required to do the same thing.
I'm a Paul kind of guy too... I have the entire book of Romans committed to memory (had to do it for a play back in college)..
We have very different takes on Paul's theology.. Paul out Calvined Calvin.
That's what you guys should do.
Go to your private thread and try and figure out how to reconcile future animal sacrifices for sin atonement with what Christ Jesus accomplished on the cross.
However, you probably shouldn't read the book of Hebrews while doing so.
I've had my share of entertaining folks man. On the stage plus. How
you could possibly memorize the entirety of the book of Romans
and not understand what Paul is saying, is beyond the pale, man.
Are you sealed/indwelt and baptized (not by water) into the Body
of Christ?
Changing your mind is just fine, but if you keep changing your mind after constantly using the word "permanent" in your original stances; eventually the word "permanent" will become meaningless when used by you.
Perhaps, you ought to turn off your Laptop and go sit on a lilly pad and
wait for a fly?
I will "permanently" mock you relentlessly. How's that?
Done.
So? What of it, punk? In your midst- in the presense of the Saviour. You've been shown this. You satanically misinterpret this passage.
Tam, put it in an area prepared for earnest Bible believing children of God.
It doesn't matter where she puts it.
No matter how hard you Darby followers try, there can't be animal sacrifices for sin atonement in the yet future.
You guys know it, but because you place the false teachings of Darby over the Bible, you will still keep trying to come up with a theory about how animal sacrifices for sin atonement in the yet future will take place.
Dispensationalism is a mess.
Answer the question, punk.
"I'm here to learn.
Debating is how I do it. I argue what I believe is correct. If I'm wrong, then I learn, and sometimes what I believe is confirmed.
If I was only about winning (like you), then I wouldn't have dropped Dispensationalism like a bag of dirt.
Plus I would have never done what you did re: defending Johnny W. You know he copied and pasted the article, and took credit for it, but you defended him anyhow. "-Tettie
Did you say this, punk?:
"I am not here to teach, instruct, evangelize, or advise anyone....I am not hear to teach. I am here to learn"-Tet.
You've admitted that you plagiarize, on TOL, so stuff your satanic charges, punk. And I showed, word for word, over 30 instances, this year alone, you plagiarizing, word for word, someone elses' exact words/articles.
You wicked, habitual liar.
There you go using the Darby name again. Preterism is the mess. 70AD indeed.
That's all the spammer has-"Darby."