ClimateSanity
New member
Everyone doesn't have the Spirit of God dwelling in them.
2 Cor ch. 2.
That's right. I agree with many that Paul might well have doubted the man was saved ("so-called brother") but he acted on faith that the man was saved and treated him as such...harshly. His actions demonstrate this:
1. Paul judged this wicked man guilty of sinning and as a threat to the church, so he ordered him expelled.
2. Paul also said he does not judge those "outside the church," meaning unbelievers. Nor should we. That's God's job. But those WITHIN the church -- believers -- are a different matter.
3. Paul assumed this man was saved and judged he be treated very harshly, for his own good.
4. Paul desired to see as many saved as possible; he would not have prescribed expulsion had he known the man was unsaved. He would have had someone preach the saving Gospel to him to make sure he believed it, then they could proceed accordingly. I refuse to believe that Paul would have ordered him cut off from THE ONLY PEOPLE IN CORINTH he'd hear the saving Gospel.
5. This incident shows that believers can sin to the point of being literally "wicked."
And if he can, you can too. Right?
If the man was not a believer---it shows because he does NOT obey.
If the man is a believer, yet sins, he needs to stop sinning.
If the man is a believer, yet sins, and then stops sinning, then he has saved himself.
I don't think we've spent much time discussing this, and it would be nice to be able to do so without GT butting in at every turn.
As far as this particular guy being saved, I doubt it. I've seen believers do things they shouldn't, but they don't revel in it. This guy was doing things even the gentiles didn't do and all they had was their God given conscience. Putting that aside, though, Paul was very concerned that the assembly was ignoring it ....thereby seeming to condone it, and therefore he admonished them. Paul knew that if the man was flaunting his deeds in the assembly, he would not turn from his evil deed by having his deed condoned. His one chance was to be cast into the world where he would be forced to once again seek out the light. A person cannot bring their own darkness into the light and expect to keep it.
We go out into the world to preach the Gospel for a reason.
is one chance was to be cast into the world where he would be forced to once again seek out the light.
Those "some" without knowledge of God are the malnourished, stunted Christians who still indulge their flesh because they evidently did not know everything you're rightly pointing out about who and what we are in Christ. THAT is why Paul speaks this to their shame -- the shame of the derelict Corinthian elders who were supposed to have raised those new believers on meat by now but hadn't even been giving them milk, apparently. Everything wrong with the Corinthian church was their fault.
The scriptures do not say the man repented.
Everyone doesn't have the Spirit of God dwelling in them.
What a case in deed; we have you here too making a case for OBEDIENCE.
Read 2 Cor 2.
Not for salvation. That's what's going to burn you.
Nonsense. There are many unbelievers who obey.
Nonsense. Believers have been delivered from the law.
Nonsense. Salvation is a gift of God. There is only ONE SAVIOUR.
You are a sad case if you think I have not read that. Paul is speaking about IF ANYONE sins. Paul does not specify that it was the man who married his father's WIFE.
2 Cor 2 indicates the man repented. You deny this. Why?
YOU JUST argued that the man would have to stop sinning to be saved.
No. He was already in Christ, which no unbeliever is. As with yourself, who is still unforgiven because you deny that the death of Christ dealt with all your sin.
YOU JUST argued that the man would have to stop sinning to be saved.