There are many people who don't have family and friends where that kind of sustainability could come about.
You seem to love ignoring portions of my argument and then claiming that my argument is unreasonable.
Here's what I ACTUALLY said:
... instead of relying on family, friends, and neighbors.
...
... instead of seeking help from family, friends, and neighbors.
...
... more unwilling to help their neighbor.
...
... I would hope that family, friends, or neighbors would come to my aid if I asked them to.
...
... instead of turning to their family or friends or neighbors for help, turn to the government.
...
... which makes it easier to avoid relying on family, friends, and neighbors for help.
So how about it, Artie, do people have NEIGHBORS to help them?
The only help they could realistically get would be through governmental aid of some sort.
... instead of relying on family, friends, and neighbors.
...
... instead of seeking help from family, friends, and neighbors.
...
... more unwilling to help their neighbor.
...
... I would hope that family, friends, or neighbors would come to my aid if I asked them to.
...
... instead of turning to their family or friends or neighbors for help, turn to the government.
...
... which makes it easier to avoid relying on family, friends, and neighbors for help.
Do people live out in the middle of nowheresville or something according to you?
Because last I checked, most people have a neighbor or two...
There's also plenty on welfare/benefits who aren't just sitting around doing nothing to find work but making the effort in the interim
Good for them! :thumb:
and who have paid into the very system that avails them when they're out of work. You are simplistic beyond words.
Insulting people is a good way to get yourself removed from the thread.
No, it doesn't
Yes, it does.
and your saying so means absolute squat.
Vulgarity will get you a time out. Would you please remove that.
And what if you didn't have any?
Pretty sure even if I didn't have any friends or family, I would still have neighbors. Oh wait, you ignored that part, didn't you?
Would you willingly starve to death?
I don't think ANYONE would do so willingly :think:
Besides...
Hunger is a pretty strong motivator...
For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat.For we hear that there are some who walk among you in a disorderly manner, not working at all, but are busybodies.Now those who are such we command and exhort through our Lord Jesus Christ that they work in quietness and eat their own bread. - 2 Thessalonians 3:10-12 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2Thessalonians3:10-12&version=NKJV
"If a man does not work, he SHALL NOT eat."
:think:
So, you'd be prepared to go into run down council estates and charitably provide for people who without government aid would be starving?
If I could offer charity, I would, if it would benefit the one I offer it to. Of course, they would have to work for it, but sure.
Those without family or friends who could support and neighbours in a similar position whereby benefits are the only means of buying food?
Huh? Did you forget a word somewhere in there? Because that question didn't make any sense...
Do you ever think things through in any depth or do you just bloviate?
:blabla:
Once again, many people aren't in a position where they have such support and what makes you think that family, friends and neighbours have some sort of financial means to aid anyway?
They don't, currently.
They would if we got rid of all the welfare and "safety net" socialist programs. Oh, and all the other stuff governments shouldn't be doing either. Get rid of those things, too.
Yeah, right...
So you know my heart then? Are you God, or something? Who are you to say I love or don't love something/someone?
While denying the needy in society even temporary aid while between jobs even.
Correction:
While denying the needy in society aid from a source that should not be providing aid, thereby preventing them from harming themselves.
There's plenty people who are on benefits who are actively looking for work
Good for them! :thumb:
and reliant on such in the interim.
You mean addicted to...
Instead of taking money from the government, they could lean on family, friends, or neighbors who would be willing to help them, and you cannot say that there wouldn't be ANY, because most people are willing to help out if it wasn't too much of a burden.
Heck, you don't even get the basics right, as follows:
:blabla:
Of course it isn't and you should be embarrassed at such a misquote, as scholarly as you seem to think you are where it comes to the Bible.
"For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil".
"Kinds of" was added later.
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. - 1 Timothy 6:10 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1Timothy6:10&version=KJV
Could you retract your accusation against me that I misquoted?
There's many an atrocious act where money plays no part at all, like rape, child molestation etc so quit lecturing when you can't even recognize the downright obvious.
Sounds like someone doesn't know that "all" doesn't always mean "all"...
For example...
Then all the land of Judea, and those from Jerusalem, went out to him and were all baptized by him in the Jordan River, confessing their sins. - Mark 1:5 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark1:5&version=NKJV
No, not the entire population of Judea went out to be baptised by John...