You are a very shameful woman to say something like that and imply something like that about me.
ECT MADist thought for the day
- Thread starter andyc
- Start date
- Status
You are a very shameful woman to say something like that and imply something like that about me.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
I truly do not know what you are spewing about. All I know, is you are being inaccurately hostile, and without reason. You are reacting like a cult follower; not a Christian sister.
:nono:
Um....you just said that my father was satan.
yes, you deliberately took my words and made them say something i did not say. While you whine about someone doing that to you.
After i gave you the benefit of the doubt to at least ask you about what was posted. You said you were taken out of context by john and then you turned and deliberately did it to me when i did nothing to you.
Who is the father of lies? Satan. Did you lie? yes.
Here is your post:
What did you say in the first sentence?
Why did you have to say "if so, you're pathetic"?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
You asked a rhetorical question that deliberately misrepresented Tet's argument.
You deliberately misrepresented the entire Reformed Faith and Confessions, with false accusations against God.
I suggest you fix yourself a calming cup of tea and refrain from trying to post in this thread, for you are contributing nothing positive.
Nang
Nang you need to get offline if you cant keep your mind out of the gutter.
hello out there, i said if you would post someones adress online and make fun of there home, you are pathetic.
What part of IF cant you read? If SO means it applies to you if its true, i also asked you if you did that. I dont know whether to believe you or not now, since you have no issue with lying obviously.
Exactly Nang.
Your first sentence was rhetorical
yep, the second one with the IF SO, wasnt though was it. But keep acting like you cannot comprehend what i said.
My age is none of your business.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
My post inferred there might be attempts to create idol worship on the part of John W with TOL chicks.
It was not a dirty thought, but a speculative wonder about the production of accommodating followers on the part of those who prove to be totally theologically inept; perhaps having to resort to creating an atmosphere of sexual male charisma. (Apparently with attempts to include males in their followings, as well as the "chicks"!)
My mind is not in the gutter, but I am not stupid or blind to the tactics of others, either. II Timothy 3:6
I'm not a MADist, and I think MAD is a false doctrine.
Therefore, you should think of me as an unsaved son of satan, demon, pathetic liar, clown, moron, idiot, serpent, legalist, spiritualizer, used car salesman, hypocrite, con man, loser, retard, Bible corrector, passive aggressive, stay at home effeminate grown man who sponges off of his wife while having homosexual tendencies for men.
Ok?
Tell that to God too nang, people here arent stupid.
If that is what you say you are, then ok
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Those are the ugly and false accusations John makes about Tet.
C'mon A4T!
Get with the argument . . . for you are siding ignorantly with evil and lawlessness.
Hopefully it is not because you, too, do not possess a love of the truth and respect for your fellow Christians!
Since you're a MADist, that's how you'll need to see me as if we ever discuss the Bible.
Nang, keep doing what you claim is wrong, then tell me how to be a christian or that i am not one or make up another wicked slander for me. I dont care.
- Status