ECT MADist thought for the day

[Nang]

I see One in Christ as some sort of "MAD Cheerleader"

He/she doesn't ever really post anything of substance, he/she more or less comes into a thread and cheers on the MADists and takes shots at those who oppose MAD.

This of course is when he/she is not busy reporting posts to the woodshed.

I put OIC on Ignore some weeks ago.

 

[Nang]

You don't talk about people though do you. Did you really post someones address on here and make fun of where they live? If so, Youre pathetic.

You need to read posts more carefully before blindly taking sides and going hostile with unsubstantiated accusations.

 

[tetelestai]

I put OIC on Ignore some weeks ago.

I've never put anyone on ignore, but it's starting to look like an attractive option.

 

[tetelestai]

You need to read posts more carefully before blindly taking sides and going hostile with unsubstantiated accusations.

It's pointless Nang

A4T and others will defend MAD and their fellow MADists no matter what.

John W is a hero to them, they love his posts. They positive rep John, and encourage him to keep doing what he does.

 

[Nang]

I've never put anyone on ignore, but it's starting to look like an attractive option.

It saves a lot of time from having to wade through vacuous "yes-men" posts.

 

[Angel4Truth]

No, I didn't post someone's address and make fun of where they live.

If John W would quote people properly, instead of out of context, we wouldn't have this problem. Why do you think he purposely doesn't use quote tags?

He quotes me and others out of context, or flat out makes up things we never said to make gullible people like you believe him.

And by believing him, you just encouraged him to keep doing it.

Read what i said again, i said if you did it, youre pathetic. I actually asked you if you did or not, didnt i.

But that's ok right? He's a MADist, and MAD has to be defended at all costs.

I have seen your posts, you are a perfect fit for MAD.

Thanks

 

[Angel4Truth]

You need to read posts more carefully before blindly taking sides and going hostile with unsubstantiated accusations.

What accusation would that be, post it. Seems you arent reading carefully enough.

 

[drbrumley]

So what is the MADist thought for the day?

 

[Nang]

What accusation would that be, post it. Seems you arent reading carefully enough.

Here, where you grossly misrepresented Reformed beliefs with accusations of teachings that do not accord with our Confession of Faith.

BTW, ever read it?

If not, you should . . . before you ever reply to me in such fashion again.

Nang

 

[Angel4Truth]

Here, where you grossly misrepresented Reformed beliefs and with accusations of teachings which do not accord with our Confession of Faith.

BTW, ever read it?

If not, you should . . . before you ever reply to me in such fashion again.

Nang

Nice backtrack there. That is not what you were talking about, but since youre totally depraved yet one of the elect anyway, I guess you get a free pass on that deliberate dishonesty. Now tell me how holy you are, then go repent.

 

[tetelestai]

youre pathetic.

Now that's more like it.

You're making Johnny W proud.

 

[Lighthouse]

Where does MAD disagree with anything i said there?

it doesn't.

That's what I was going to say.

The way you worded this, you believe that repentance is necessary, Madists only believe that repentance is what a person ought to do post salvation. If you are out to please the madists you'll have to reword what you said.

Repentance cannot happen post-salvation.:nono:

Madists think that God accepts unrepentant fools in heaven.

Liar.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Now that's more like it.

You're making Johnny W proud.

Liar, youre making your father proud.

 

[tetelestai]

So what is the MADist thought for the day?

"Which came first, Paul or Paul's Gospel"

 

[Nang]

Nice backtrack there. That is not what you were talking about, but since youre totally depraved yet one of the elect anyway, I guess you get a free pass on that deliberate dishonesty. Now tell me how holy you are, then go repent.

What "deliberate dishonesty"?

 

[john w]

It's pointless Nang

A4T and others will defend MAD and their fellow MADists no matter what.

John W is a hero to them, they love his posts. They positive rep John, and encourage him to keep doing what he does.

And you are obsessed with MAD and me, having a man crush on me. Sorry, Craigie-I dig chicks, and am not interested in your "man made" theories, "inventions."

 

[Nang]

And you are obseesed with me, having a man crush on me. Sorry, Craigie0I dig chicks, and am not interested in your "man made" theories, "inventions."

Makes one wonder what kind of PM's you send to the chicks, to get one to defend you so blindly as A4T is doing.

:think:

 

[Angel4Truth]

What "deliberate dishonesty"?

Sweetie, ask God. Try getting it to fly there.

You know what you did and anyone can go back through the exchange and see clearly that you were not referencing that with your comment - because the context would make no sense, even to the complete moron reading through it all.

If you are ok revealing complete dishonesty, thats on you babe.

 

[tetelestai]

Liar, youre making your father proud.

You're supposed to bold and underline the small case "f".

Like this:

You, like your father in Genesis 3, can read, and delete from the book. He taught you that. You learned that from him.

Maybe next time you'll get it right.

 

[Angel4Truth]

tet keep talking so everyone can see how dishonest you are