Is the doctrine of Eternal Conscious Torment biblical or not?

Jason0047

Member
Amen. And, just like He exists above time-space (which is beyond our capability to understand) He also exists ABOVE our moral judgment. Our judgment of Him as immoral (should He condone eternal suffering) is not correct, since we don't have the moral capability to find fault with God in ANY way. No, it would just mean that we simply don't understand His Righteousness.

Believers can understand God's Omni-Righteousness. How so? Well, the Scriptures say that believers can know God's Judgments because God teaches it to them,

Psalm 119:102
"I have not departed from thy judgments: for thou hast taught me."

Yet, you are saying we cannot know the truth on God's righteousness. However, the Scriptures say that a believer will be guided into ALL truth,

John 16:13
"Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come." (cf. John 16:14 KJV, John 16:15 KJV,).

For we are to be made into the image of Christ's likeness. Meaning, we are to behave like Jesus and His righteousness. So if we are to behave like Jesus in His judgments, then surely you would agree that a country or state should endorse the unending torture of people who commit a finite amount of crimes, too? Right? For the powers that be are put in place by God; And anyone who resists the Law of a nation is rebelling against God (Unless that Law conflicts with the Laws of God's Word) (Romans 13:1, 2, 3). So let's say a person steals a loaf of bread and goes 10 miles over the speed limit and throws a piece of trash out the window. This person's fine would be unending horrible torture for the rest of their life (And that would be a just punishment because God will supposedly do the same to all wicked (unrepentant Law breakers) in the afterlife). However, does that sound like a fair punishment for this person's crimes? What if this person did a bunch of horrible things within their life time? Do you think a country should torture a person as long as they live (even if they did a bunch of horrible things)? Would you like to live in a country that had such penal system? Wouldn't their sense of justice be more in line with God's justice as you see it? In other words, if you are all for eternal torture for a finite amount of crimes, then you would not hesitate at the idea in moving to a country that had this kind of punishment because it lines up with God's version of punishment.

Not really:

James 2:10
For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.

If we offend in ONE point, we are guilty of all.

If I am understanding you correctly here: You are basically trying to say that we can't know God's judgments because we are sinful and unable to judge others because we all stand guilty before God. However, nothing could be further from the truth, though.

First, a true believer who is born again spiritually has repented of their sins and accepted Jesus as their Savior. This means that they have admitted their sins before God and they have turned from them. If they slip up into sin or if they are struggling with a particular sin, then they will confess that sin so as to be cleansed of all unrighteousness and the Lord will help them to stop (If they truly want to live for the Lord). In other words, a true believer does not stay down in the mud of sin like unbelievers. James 2:10 KJV is in context of not having a respect of persons and in being obedient to God's Laws by loving your neighbor (See James 2:1 KJV, James 2:2 KJV, James 2:3 KJV, James 2:4 KJV, James 2:5 KJV, James 2:6 KJV, James 2:7 KJV, James 2:8 KJV, James 2:9 KJV).

Second, the Scriptures say we can Judge righteously.

John 7:24
"Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment."

In fact, 1st Corinthians says we shall judge the world and angels and that we are allowed to judge matters internally within the church (1 Corinthians 6:1 KJV, 1 Corinthians 6:2 KJV, 1 Corinthians 6:3 KJV, 1 Corinthians 6:4 KJV, 1 Corinthians 6:5 KJV, 1 Corinthians 6:6 KJV).

God is Just. He punishes evil-doers. Who are we to question His judgment? He judged the angels the moment they sinned. They stood in His Presence. We walk in darkness, so when we sin He gives us a chance to repent. If we don't then we suffer the same punishment that is given to all sinners: torment of flames, forever.I believe that God sees us in our sinful state as we are: sinners, deserving punishment. He gives the punishment equally to all who deserve it. No one can argue with His Judgment. God said it and it is true, whether anyone believes Him or not.

So should somebody commit suicide because they believe Romans 12:1 says that we are to be a living sacrifice? No, of course not. And why not? Because we know that such a thing is wrong. But yet, with your theological interpretation of Scripture, this person could ignore the morality of a situation and they could kill themselves because they believe they are obeying the Word of God. In other words, what you believe is no different. You just believe your wrong view of Scripture and you don't need any moral reason to explain God's judgment as being just or right. You are basically trying to say that God's judgments are unknowable because we are sinful beings. However, if a person is a true believer, they would be walking uprightly with the Lord and they will be guided into all truth by the Spirit so as to know and defend God's judgments in light of His righteousness or holiness.

In fact, God's goodness can be seen from cover to cover within our Bibles, too. For God does not change. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. So if the Lord is going to torture someone in the future forever and ever, then we have to see this type of behavior in God at some other place within His Word, too. However, we do not see anything in God's Word that would even remotely suggest such a dark thing, though. For God judges fairly. He is not going to punish people beyond what the actual crime requires. In other words, believing in the ECT (Eternal Conscious Torment) version of God makes Him out to be a monster and not as the good God that we have come to know who is fair and just in all His judgments.
 
Last edited:

God's Truth

New member
No, The Bible says so. I'm just in agreement with It.

James 2:10
For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.

No way does the Bible say we can offend on one point!

What James says is for Christians.

James is speaking about the ROYAL LAW of love your neighbor as yourself.

Let us say that you do not sin by stealing from your neighbor, but you commit adultery with his wife---you are then guilty of breaking the whole law.

If you sin against your neighbor and cause him harm---then you do not love your neighbor.
 

Jason0047

Member
And a believer can be cleansed of all unrighteousness (i.e. sin) if they confess their sins (See 1 John 2:1, 1 John 1:9). Meaning that if they do break the Law in one point (being guilty of breaking all of the Law), they can get their heart right with God again by repenting of their sins (i.e. by confessing and forsaking that sin, whereby they will continue to properly trust in Jesus as their Savior and substitute).

Besides, the context of James 2:10 is in light of respect of persons and in obeying God's laws. Nowhere is it an endorsement for believers to have a license for sin because they have a belief on Jesus. For James 2:17, 18, 19 refutes that type of thinking. In other words, while works in and of themselves do not save a person (Ephesians 5:8, 9), a true faith will naturally produce good fruit that is of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22, 23, 24). For a good tree cannot bring forth bad fruit and a bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit (See Matthew chapter 7).

http://biblehub.com/kjv/matthew/7.htm
 

Omniskeptical

BANNED
Banned
I believe that one who sins violates the whole law, as God stated through James.
The man's name was Jacob, and he didn't someone has broken the whole by breaking one particular; he said that person is a liability to all, since he is claiming to uphold the law. Otherwise, murders are guilty of judgement, the brother angry without reason be guilty of Judgement, the person who says raca is guilty of the council, the person saying thou fool is guilty of the Gehenna of fire. G1777 means liability, not guilt.


Mat 5:21

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger G1777 of the judgment:


Mat 5:22

But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger G1777 of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger G1777 of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger G1777 of hell fire.
 

Omniskeptical

BANNED
Banned
No way does the Bible say we can offend on one point!

What James says is for Christians.

James is speaking about the ROYAL LAW of love your neighbor as yourself.

Let us say that you do not sin by stealing from your neighbor, but you commit adultery with his wife---you are then guilty of breaking the whole law.

If you sin against your neighbor and cause him harm---then you do not love your neighbor.
His name is Jacob.
 

God's Truth

New member
The man's name was Jacob, and he didn't someone has broken the whole by breaking one particular; he said that person is a liability to all, since he is claiming to uphold the law. Otherwise, murders are guilty of judgement, the brother angry without reason be guilty of Judgement, the person who says raca is guilty of the council, the person saying thou fool is guilty of the Gehenna of fire. G1777 means liability, not guilt.


If you broke ONE COMMAND against your neighbor---then YOU are GUILTY of breaking the WHOLE command to love your neighbor.
 

Omniskeptical

BANNED
Banned
If you broke ONE COMMAND against your neighbor---then YOU are GUILTY of breaking the WHOLE command to love your neighbor.
But the way James 2:10 is translated is that you are guilty of murder if you commit adultery. This is not true in reality. But the Liability is to everyone, and is of all commandments. Since no one is guilty of authorities or places, but rather crimes, translating enochos as guilt makes no consistent sense, and supports the total inability lie.
 

God's Truth

New member
But the way James 2:10 is translated is that you are guilty of murder if you commit adultery. This is not true in reality. But the Liability is to everyone, and is of all commandments. Since no one is guilty of authorities or places, but rather crimes, translating enochos as guilt makes no consistent sense, and supports the total inability lie.

No.

If you are guilty of stealing from your neighbor or committing adultery with your neighbor---but you did NOT murder your neighbor---YOU ARE STILL GUILTY of breaking the Royal Law of Love your neighbor as yourself.

If you do not break the law by stealing from your neighbor, and you do not break the law by murdering your neighbor, but you do commit adultery with your neighbor’s wife---then you who have not stolen nor murdered are still guilty of breaking the whole law---because you did NOT love your neighbor.
 

Omniskeptical

BANNED
Banned
No.

If you are guilty of stealing from your neighbor or committing adultery with your neighbor---but you did NOT murder your neighbor---YOU ARE STILL GUILTY of breaking the Royal Law of Love your neighbor as yourself.

If you do not break the law by stealing from your neighbor, and you do not break the law by murdering your neighbor, but you do commit adultery with your neighbor’s wife---then you who have not stolen nor murdered are still guilty of breaking the whole law---because you did NOT love your neighbor.
No, you are liable of ever one of those rules or laws, rather than guilty.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
No way does the Bible say we can offend on one point!

What James says is for Christians.

James is speaking about the ROYAL LAW of love your neighbor as yourself.

Let us say that you do not sin by stealing from your neighbor, but you commit adultery with his wife---you are then guilty of breaking the whole law.

If you sin against your neighbor and cause him harm---then you do not love your neighbor.

However, who was James speaking to?
 

God's Truth

New member
No, you are liable of ever one of those rules or laws, rather than guilty.

What in the world are you talking about, for I explained it to you simple enough. Go read what I said again and think about it more.

Liable, guilty,---makes no difference! YOU DO NOT obey the ROYAL LAW of Love your neighbor as yourself---if you break even one of the commands.

Tell me, if you do not steal from your neighbor, but you bear false witness against him---that means you who obeyed by not stealing is still guilty of not loving your neighbor.
 
Top