beanieboy said:Again, email me.
I don't want to make this thread about me specifically.
email is on it's way....
beanieboy said:Again, email me.
I don't want to make this thread about me specifically.
Beanie boy-beanieboy said:Honestly?
I feel like if my name is going to be in a thread, I should probably have a say.
I think I was baited, and from what I have seen, there are some really great christians, and some christians that will ignore their own bible, and condone their own questionable behavior by twisting the verses, omitting words, or ignoring copious amounts of passages calling to love.
That's one of the reasons Buddhism makes more sense to me.
I don't see many spiteful Buddhists.
The Dali Lama is far more peaceful that any televangelist.
The last respectful one I can think of is Billy Graham.
That's sad, because there a lot of them out there, one creepier than the other - Pat Robertson, Pat Bucchanon, Oral Roberts...
<shudder>
I suppose "creepy" by your definition means "thinks homosexuality is a sin".beanieboy said:Honestly?
That's sad, because there a lot of them out there, one creepier than the other - Pat Robertson, Pat Bucchanon, Oral Roberts...
<shudder>
Agape4Robin said:Beanie boy-
I'm sorry that you have been given a rough time by those who call themselves Christian. I hope that I haven't been one to give you such a hard time. My intentions are good, but sometimes my mouth gets ahead of my brain or my heart.
I know that we may have had some raucous debate about homosexuality. It is a subject that I am just sick about. The bible is clear about many types of sin and does not support sex outside of marriage at all. So to all the ones who strongly oppose homosexuality, who are not married, I'm willing to bet that they sleep with their girlfriends or boyfriends. Living/ sleeping together with out the benefit of marriage is just as much of an abomination to God as homosexuality. I realize that this may not be a popular thing to say, but there it is. Some christians are under the false belief that being in love and monogamous is ok and not "sin", but it most certainly is if sex is involved as a part of that relationship. Sex is for the marriage bed only and those who are single are to remain celibate until marriage. But enough about the biblical sex lesson. I'm sure this is not something you just learned today.
Please reconsider buddhism. I understand your feelings about christianity, I was angry and confused by all the hypocrisy in the christian community. Christianity is not supposed to be about religion. It is a relationship with the Saviour, Jesus Christ. It is not about tolerance, but love. Love for Christ, God, others and self.
There are other religious TV personalities that maybe you should look into such as, Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, Adrian Rogers, Charles Stanley, John MacArthur, Greg Laurie and Max Lucado, just to name a few. I can give you more info about them if you like. The other televangelists you listed are more politically motivated and I question their agendas.
I'd like to hear from you about this.....let me know if I can help.
Dread Helm said:I wonder how creepy Bob Enyart is by that standard?
D & D? That's just too much. :chuckle:beanieboy said:There was another dramatization of a nerd who was playing D&D. His character died, and the only way to bring him back to life was to get the blood of a child. He goes outside behind his house, and meet Billy who is coming home from his friend's house.
On Fire said:You don't know any of the people here. YOU try again, witch.
Justin (Wiccan) said:This I know, Christians: if, indeed, your Bible is true and I am sent to hell, before I go, I will stand as witness to your hypocracy. You are greedy, cowardly thieves, who have accepted the grace of God yet use the maliciousness of your hearts to drive others away from that grace, as if it were in short supply and you were hoarding it for yourselves.
It is not the skeptics and Pagans who take God's words and make it into a lie, but yourselves.
Justin
Sold Out said:I really hope you don't take that chance Justin (finding out too late that Christianity is true).
temple 2000 said:Dread Helm
Originally Posted by Dread Helm
But I bear love, and tough love.
I live by Romans 12:9
Let love be without dissimulation.
Sir, Tough love is not doing for the person what he can do for him/herself. It has nothing to do with name calling.
Nineveh said:If beanie were being unjustly judged, I would be one of the first to say something, but he isn't.
I have not read this whole thread, and likely I never will. My heart is much too soft for me to take much angry language, and my soul gets to aching. However, I know in my heart that there are times in which our language must be formed to both cause grief and to express warning. To say that Christians must always be "nice" in their talk is nothing more than an attempt to muzzle them, to make them ineffective. We must be able to warn people away from sin and false leaders, and we must be able, occasionaly, to shock people to make them see the falseness of their beliefs. As well, I must be prepared to receive it in return. Love almost always calls for gentleness, however, sometimes love also calls for us to do things that hurt. Even in medicine we recognize this (otherwise no one would ever get an enema).Caledvwlch said:I agree with Justin, in post #370. The last people who should be voting yes on this pole should be Christians. I'm ashamed to have ever called myself one.
Justin (Wiccan) said:Oh, so it's OK if I call names in addition to witnessing? I'll call Fred Phelps and tell him you approve.
Justin
I don't care for Phelps' technique (if that is what I should call it). He seems to call a mean bunch to him, and ones who judgement lies in bias, not in a need for any Christlike behavior. But I can never be sure, so I just don't approach people the way he does.Justin (Wiccan) said:Oh, so it's OK if I call names in addition to witnessing? I'll call Fred Phelps and tell him you approve.
Justin