ECT How can there be a another Gospel based on Gal. 1:22 ? The faith Paul once destroy ?

DAN P

Well-known member
dan, others are now supposed to ignore the context of scripture recording that Paul now sought to preach the "faith" he once sought to destroy ?

The heard was about what they had heard about Paul being the persecutor of the church of Jesus i.e the B.O.C.

Gal 1:23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.

Obviously what the verse means is that Paul joined in belief and action those things, the gospel of Grace, that he once sought to destroy.


Hi and what does SOUGHT mean ??

In Acts 8:1 and 3 , Paul was DEVASTATING the ASSEMBLY !!

Which ASSEMBLY / EKKLESIA was this ??

So , you are believeing the FAKE NEWS of HEARING written against Paul in Gal 1:23 and in Gal 2:18 and until you ever look and see what Greeks mean , you are LOST !!

dan p
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
lol, even if what you posted is true, which of course it is NOT, how would that change the meaning and context of scripture recording that Paul now sought to preach the "faith" he once sought to destroy.

MADist cannot accept that the things that are the same are the same.

"context"-56/66 posts
 

dodge

New member
Hi and what does SOUGHT mean ??

In Acts 8:1 and 3 , Paul was DEVASTATING the ASSEMBLY !!

Which ASSEMBLY / EKKLESIA was this ??

So , you are believeing the FAKE NEWS of HEARING written against Paul in Gal 1:23 and in Gal 2:18 and until you ever look and see what Greeks mean , you are LOST !!

dan p

I know the drill any and all scripture that proves MAD is a man made lie is false. You really need to learn HOW to read, dan.
 

DAN P

Well-known member
I know the drill any and all scripture that proves MAD is a man made lie is false. You really need to learn HOW to read, dan.


Hi and just love how you avoid any question that is above your knowledge and always attack the messenger and never the word ??

Just love the way your writing of your FAKE NEWS and if accepted 2 Cor 3:13-16 , which you CAN NEVER deny , you might learn how we RIGHTLY think and leave your LEFTY FAKE NEWS crowd !!

But if you get to heaven , you will be transformed into a RIGHTIST and calling me a LAIR , means that I am correct !!

dan p
 

dodge

New member
Hi and just love how you avoid any question that is above your knowledge and always attack the messenger and never the word ??

Just love the way your writing of your FAKE NEWS and if accepted 2 Cor 3:13-16 , which you CAN NEVER deny , you might learn how we RIGHTLY think and leave your LEFTY FAKE NEWS crowd !!

But if you get to heaven , you will be transformed into a RIGHTIST and calling me a LAIR , means that I am correct !!

dan p

Coming from you that is a hoot. When you are asked any question you throw a destroyed context of Greek around like you know something about Greek which you do not have a clue.

98% of the time you answer a question with a totally un-related question.

You dan have no clue.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Your reasoning is unclear.

How does this mean there is necessarily only one gospel?





Because only one other gospel gets mentioned which he opposes as the apostle of Christ, which infected some leaders, and which was resolved at the Acts 15 council.

If your club would stick to actual text details instead of inventing another phantom issue that needs to be resolved, it would really help. The above circumstance is the only circumstance the NT deals with as far as mistaken gospels. The reason you have the phantom issue is to try to prop up D'ism.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Because only one other gospel gets mentioned which he opposes as the apostle of Christ, which infected some leaders, and which was resolved at the Acts 15 council.

If your club would stick to actual text details instead of inventing another phantom issue that needs to be resolved, it would really help. The above circumstance is the only circumstance the NT deals with as far as mistaken gospels. The reason you have the phantom issue is to try to prop up D'ism.

Huh?
 

dodge

New member
Your reasoning is unclear.

How does this mean there is necessarily only one gospel?

Stripe,since Paul preached the same "faith" he once sought to destroy that means Paul did NOT preach a new message or faith as many claim.

Gal 1:22 And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:
Gal 1:23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.

It means that those before Paul got saved and had already heard the gospel of grace, or they could NOT have been in that same faith that Paul began to preach and teach.
 

dodge

New member
It's funny that nobody has a clue except you

You do understand that MANY MANY folks know MAD is a lie and nothing but a deception and diversion from the truth right?

You act like those who know MAD to be a lie are in the minority ! Where do you live in the middle of a desert ? MAD is nothing more than as Paul said "another gospel" and leads those that buy into MAD into ignoring the teachings of Jesus and all other Apostles except for their pope Paul.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Stripe,since Paul preached the same "faith" he once sought to destroy that means Paul did NOT preach a new message or faith as many claim.

Gal 1:22 And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:
Gal 1:23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.

It means that those before Paul got saved and had already heard the gospel of grace, or they could NOT have been in that same faith that Paul began to preach and teach.
Your insistence on remaining completely ignorant is a testament to your illogical and fallacious "reasoning" and your extreme zealotry for falsehood.

Paul did NOT preach the gospel of the grace of God until he RECEIVED it.

Paul preached many things; some old and some NEW.
 
Top