musterion
Well-known member
.
No, because I'm neither a Democrat nor a liberal. Those are prerequisites.
"I'll have them _____ voting Democrat for a hundred years."
LBJ
Good article: "Who Radicalized the Finsbury Park Van Man?"
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
No, because I'm neither a Democrat nor a liberal. Those are prerequisites.
"I'll have them _____ voting Democrat for a hundred years."
LBJ
Wouldn't that mean to you that anyone that supports Trump would be a supporter of white supremacistism, since you label Trump as a white supremacist?
Your naive belief that the 'source' makes info automatically wrong has blindsided you.
I find it quite revealing that you're more concerned with a photoshopped picture of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger speaking to a group of KKK women (where by her own admission "received a dozen more invitations from like minded groups") then the fact that she spoke to them.
I've done enough research on the filthy degenerate Margaret Sanger to know what she stood for. Either refute the information that I've provided about her in the MLK Jr. thread, or run along and celebrate this very important month with your friends.
On that note: Sanger appeared concerned that the women of the KKK would find out about her stance on abortion.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I didn't label Trump a white supremacist. I said white supremacists like what he has to say.
So no, it wouldn't mean.
Your naive belief that I don't see the messages both explicit (I quoted them for you but I don't think you ever answered me) and implicit in your videos of pretty white girls has left me no other option but to accept that you agree with some or much of what white supremacists have to say, while maintaining your right to feel insulted that anyone would ever think such a thing of you.
The vast majority who posted white superiority posts in this thread are devout Trump followers.
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?123234-I-m-Proud-Of-My-Anglo-Saxon-Heritage!
Given a little more time I could pull up a recent comment from you...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Well, there is also the fact that it is impossible to deny that white supremacists support Trump because they view him as a kindred spirit. Regardless of whether someone associates with white supremacists, their vote has given Trump ,a white supremacist supporter with a history of bashing black people, a thumbs up.
People that hate whites and commit violence and rioting sure love what Bernie Sanders and other dems have to say
Whoa.
Answering additional questions from you shouldn't have an impact on what I have already said.
You just said I agree with some or much of what white supremacists have to say.
I will while I patently await you to produce why I am a white supremacist.
Must be that white guilt you have been brainwashed with.THAT must be it. I hate all white people.
Fire away!
musterion
Well-known member
Such as?????
Don't hold your breath.
I won't be.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
You're going to have to eat a lot of popcorn, since I'm not going to enter another non-productive conversation with you.
You'll have to be content with my questions and your non-answers of the past. Here you go:
Who's "we?" Because I don't hate anyone. I did watch it. In fact, I took some notes: And then attractive young white women with the text: Seriously? So a bunch of white guys are afraid there won't be enough white girls to go around? Where is that, exactly? On top, and all others beneath? Because that’s the subtext. Spread what word, exactly? (That according to David Duke in the other video, white DNA "is a stairway to the stars?") We ALL have a little stardust in us. :chuckle: Who took that away? What destiny is that, exactly? Do you, as a Christian, really believe that? And liberals are the special snowflakes? :chuckle: I think it's emotional manipulation, very common with propaganda. It's meant to stir the emotions. I also thought the slow-motion battle sequences were a little over the top, but hey, that's me. Yeah. It was pretty horrible. All of it. |
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Hmm, dunno where you've pulled that from cos I've never said that.
musterion
Well-known member
Nobody asked my opinion but here it is.
I visited nine countries when I was in the USN. Europe, mainly, but saw lots of people from other areas...Africans, Middle Eastern, Orientals, South Americans, Pacific Islanders, etc.
Having observed people from pretty much everywhere, I have decided there is indeed such a thing as an objectively beautiful woman, and that women do not have to look remotely "white" nor Western to be so. I admit up front that I've decided this because I first came to the conclusion that, biologically speaking, women require only one thing to get a man interested in mating/marriage: physical attractiveness. That's it. They may well (and usually do) have many other positive traits. But as far as reproduction (and let's be honest, that's our driving force), that's what counts when men survey women. There's some basic traits that all men (who ARE men) respond to...but one of the big ones, maybe the biggest, is the hip/waist ratio. It's there for a reason.
On the other hand (and ladies, feel free to chime in here), worldwide it seems required, to varying degrees, that men have clear signs of strength, virility, confidence, ability and willingness to protect...the very things that become superfluous if not undesirable in a decaying society like ours, yet are still necessary to our survival as a society. I am now convinced the desire for those features in a man are hard-wired into women, just as men almost can't help but turn our heads when a nice hip/waist ratio walks by. It's instinctual, just part of how God made us all.
(Mr. Chekov, raise shields...)
I visited nine countries when I was in the USN. Europe, mainly, but saw lots of people from other areas...Africans, Middle Eastern, Orientals, South Americans, Pacific Islanders, etc.
Having observed people from pretty much everywhere, I have decided there is indeed such a thing as an objectively beautiful woman, and that women do not have to look remotely "white" nor Western to be so. I admit up front that I've decided this because I first came to the conclusion that, biologically speaking, women require only one thing to get a man interested in mating/marriage: physical attractiveness. That's it. They may well (and usually do) have many other positive traits. But as far as reproduction (and let's be honest, that's our driving force), that's what counts when men survey women. There's some basic traits that all men (who ARE men) respond to...but one of the big ones, maybe the biggest, is the hip/waist ratio. It's there for a reason.
On the other hand (and ladies, feel free to chime in here), worldwide it seems required, to varying degrees, that men have clear signs of strength, virility, confidence, ability and willingness to protect...the very things that become superfluous if not undesirable in a decaying society like ours, yet are still necessary to our survival as a society. I am now convinced the desire for those features in a man are hard-wired into women, just as men almost can't help but turn our heads when a nice hip/waist ratio walks by. It's instinctual, just part of how God made us all.
(Mr. Chekov, raise shields...)
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You've had your head handed to you on a plate so much on the subject (including by anna on here) that nothing more needs to be added.
I see you're still pompously boasting about stats that really aren't that impressive, even less so given that the majority of those views will reflect that of here - your being an obsessive, gay obsessed nut. If you have this "army of fans" they're remarkably reticent to sign up and join your "moral crusade"...I mean, who else posts to any extent on the thing apart from you these days?
I'll likely not bother returning to it although I hope you'll refrain from gossiping about me on it in turn.
Last edited: