Fiona Hill: "The president was trying to stage a coup"

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
mrz040122dAPR20220401064505.jpg
Lefties love black conservatives because it lets them give vent to their racist views in a politically acceptable manner
 

marke

Well-known member
Lincoln's wife was mentally ill. Clarence Thomas' wife technically isn't so far as I'm aware, and yet she is nonetheless crazy.
Under the current democrat socialist atheist Marxist fascist rule of our illegitimately elected demented president, you cannot possibly know whether she is ill or not and you cannot know whether or not she qualifies as a woman because you are not a doctor and you are not a democrat politician.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
The State Bar of Texas is seeking legal consequences for former President Donald Trump's former attorney Sidney Powell in a lawsuit claiming that she engaged in misconduct for pursuing several lawsuits baselessly alleging fraud in the 2020 election, according to court documents released Tuesday.

The request for disciplinary action suit was filed in Dallas County District Court on March 1. The suit was brought by the Texas bar association's Commission for Lawyer Discipline.

Powell, who gained national attention as one of the attorneys who pushed Trump's election falsehoods and filed multiple lawsuits (in Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin) in an attempt to change the results of the 2020 election, is licensed to practice law in Texas.

In the complaint, the commission alleges that Powell "had no reasonable basis to believe the lawsuits she filed were not frivolous."

 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

For about 10 minutes this week, it was like the good old days for state-run media — they thought they had finally gaffed him this time, Donald J. Trump, the great orange whale that the Captain Ahabs of fake news have been pursuing all these years.

Gaps in the White House phone logs of Jan. 6! Worse than Watergate!

It was a bombshell, the walls were closing in, it was a turning point, a tipping point, breaking news, the beginning of the end, whistleblowers, dark clouds, monumental implications, a watershed.

Until, as always, it wasn’t. Instead it was yet another Emily Litella moment.

 

marke

Well-known member
The State Bar of Texas is seeking legal consequences for former President Donald Trump's former attorney Sidney Powell in a lawsuit claiming that she engaged in misconduct for pursuing several lawsuits baselessly alleging fraud in the 2020 election, according to court documents released Tuesday.

The request for disciplinary action suit was filed in Dallas County District Court on March 1. The suit was brought by the Texas bar association's Commission for Lawyer Discipline.

Powell, who gained national attention as one of the attorneys who pushed Trump's election falsehoods and filed multiple lawsuits (in Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin) in an attempt to change the results of the 2020 election, is licensed to practice law in Texas.

In the complaint, the commission alleges that Powell "had no reasonable basis to believe the lawsuits she filed were not frivolous."

Most lawyers, politicians, and media spokespeople say they do not believe there was any voter fraud, but none of them has been able to demonstrate against all the evidence of fraud that no fraud took place.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Most lawyers, politicians, and media spokespeople say they do not believe there was any voter fraud, but none of them has been able to demonstrate against all the evidence of fraud that no fraud took place.
President Trump got all his days in court. That's how our constitution decides matters of great importance that aren't criminal about matters of fact. First, is there a fact? Or if you cannot demonstrate that there is a fact, then the court system will reject you. Do you think that this rejection process is fair? Who might this process unintentionally yet systemically discriminate against? Certainly not the former president! People with a lot of money and who also know a lot of attorneys are not going to get rejected by the courts for no reason or for flimsy reason, President Trump's cases were rejected for strong reasons. The judges and justices involved all knew how important the subject was to resolve one way or another. Their collective resolution was that the election was not irregular enough to render its outcome fake. There were irregularities but they didn't overturn the result. All the former president's attorneys and strategists couldn't demonstrate to the courts that the election results were wrong.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Few lawyers, politicians, and media spokespeople say they do believe there was voter fraud, but none of them has been able to demonstrate against the lack of evidence of fraud that massive voter fraud took place.
 

marke

Well-known member
President Trump got all his days in court. That's how our constitution decides matters of great importance that aren't criminal about matters of fact. First, is there a fact? Or if you cannot demonstrate that there is a fact, then the court system will reject you. Do you think that this rejection process is fair? Who might this process unintentionally yet systemically discriminate against? Certainly not the former president! People with a lot of money and who also know a lot of attorneys are not going to get rejected by the courts for no reason or for flimsy reason, President Trump's cases were rejected for strong reasons. The judges and justices involved all knew how important the subject was to resolve one way or another. Their collective resolution was that the election was not irregular enough to render its outcome fake. There were irregularities but they didn't overturn the result. All the former president's attorneys and strategists couldn't demonstrate to the courts that the election results were wrong.
Whether or not Trump was treated fairly in court has nothing to do with the fact that the democrats have resisted every effort of millions of Americans to investigate the multiple evidence of fraud and democrats have even demonized and jailed innocent Americans for protesting against voter fraud.
 

marke

Well-known member
Few lawyers, politicians, and media spokespeople say they do believe there was voter fraud, but none of them has been able to demonstrate against the lack of evidence of fraud that massive voter fraud took place.
Investigations into evidence of voter fraud continue to reveal massive flaws in the 2020 election that democrats claim do not exist.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Investigations into evidence of voter fraud continue to reveal massive accuracies in the 2020 election that republicans claim do not exist.
 

marke

Well-known member
Investigations into evidence of voter fraud continue to reveal massive accuracies in the 2020 election that republicans claim do not exist.

New Peer-Reviewed Research Finds Evidence of 2020 Voter Fraud

COMMENTARY

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...20_voter_fraud_147378.html#comments-container
By John R. Lott Jr.
March 28, 2022
(AP Photo/Matt Slocum)
By a margin of 52% to 40%, voters believe that “cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.” That’s per a Rasmussen Reports survey from this month. This stands in stark contrast to the countless news stories editorializing about “no evidence of voter fraud” and “the myth of voter fraud.”
It isn’t just Republicans who believe this cheating occurred. Even 34% of Democrats believe it, as do 38% of those who “somewhat” support President Biden. A broad range of Americans think this: men, women, all age groups, whites, those who are neither white nor black, Republicans, those who are neither Republicans nor Democrats, all job categories, all income groups except those making over $200,000 per year, and all education groups except those who attended graduate school.


And with good reason. New research of mine is forthcoming in the peer-reviewed economics journal Public Choice, and it finds evidence of around 255,000 excess votes (possibly as many as 368,000) for Joe Biden in six swing states where Donald Trump lodged accusations of fraud. Biden only carried these states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – by a total of 313,253 votes. Excluding Michigan, the gap was 159,065.

 

marke

Well-known member
It's been over a year and a half since Sidney Powell supposedly released the Kraken, but I have seen neither hide nor hair of it yet. Nor has any judge in any courtroom.
I suspect Sidney Powell may have been approaching the fact of voter fraud from a different angle than investigators backed by millions of Americans are taking.
 

marke

Well-known member
Millions more Americans know that even Republican audits and recounts have confirmed the results of the 2020 election.
Apparently, millions of Americans are still deluded into thinking democrats would never commit voter fraud in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
 
Top