Countdown To President Trump Re-election
- Thread starter ok doser
- Start date
Took a look this morning. Unless they kept all the mail-in Trump votes for last, Biden has Pennsylvania. And as long has his lead continues in Nevada and Arizona, he won't even need it. Biden just pulled ahead of Trump in Georgia. That would put him at 269 electoral votes, even if he doesn't win Pennsylvania, Nevada or Arizona. Trump is in a huge fix now. If he stops the vote, he automatically loses. If the vote continues, he'll almost certainly lose Pennsylvania.
Rock and a hard place.
Rock and a hard place.
Biden just took the lead in Pennsylvania. Remarkably, Biden is winning the mail-in vote, even from red counties in Pennsylvania. The only likely path for Trump now, is to go to court.
If they are legal voters, who voted before the deadline, then it is the will of the people. And yes, absentee and mail-in ballots have decided other elections. The law is what it is, and the "will of the people" is what the majority of legal voters voted for.
Countdown to President Trump re-election: 10...9...8...7...6...5...4..
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
For the life of me I cannot figure out why Trump would announce the existence of watermarks before the votes were all counted. All that did was enable the cheating Dems in the swing states to freeze the counting allowing them time print new fraudulent ballots WITHOUT watermarks. Why would he do that?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
My first impulse is to laugh at what you just said, but it's just so sad that you'd be so suckered in by such obviously fake conspiracy theories.
Q didn't come through for you because Q isn't real.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Who will tell him indeed...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
They are the exceptions. Five out of fifty.
Too many periods. Not enough capitalization.
If you can go to the store or the pharmacy or the post office then you can vote in person.
We have the electoral system.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Answer the question. Are the votes fraudulent?
Irrelevant, and doesn't answer the question. Are the votes fraudulent?
Which has chosen Joe Biden.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
It's not that I don't like it, it's that it was an enormous change from what we've been doing for centuries. If tens of millions of people were going to vote with absentee ballots days and weeks before Election Day, then that's a different process than we've been using, and that means that campaigning that is based on the old process might not be as effective as when we express our collective will in large and historically unchangeable part on Election Day. The Trump campaign was defrauded.
As I said and I repeat, I'm not blaming any kind of conspiracy on what's happened, I'm saying that what happened was wrong, and I support the president's contesting the results, and I want our Supreme Court to weigh in on the matter.
This was an unprecedented election, that's a fact. Never before have so many millions of votes been cast by mail and almost all of them were mailed before Election Day. How easy was it for someone to change their mail-in vote once they mailed it? Do you know? It wasn't easy.
And, the covid ballots are like 4-to-1 in Biden's favor. The reason I mention this is because this doesn't reflect the electorate at all, we are fifty-fifty between the two guys, not 80-20. Those votes do not represent America.
If we want to change our system to be all mail-in, or to relax the rules for absentee ballots then fine, let's all do it, and let's know what we are getting into. Let's give both campaigns the same time to adjust strategies. What happened this year was that due to the covid, we hastily made what appeared to be a small change to our system, but it wound up being enormous. Like I said, it wasn't anybody's fault that it happened, but it happened, and the president was harmed by the change, and that is just wrong.
I'd accept the ruling of the Supreme Court on the matter however, even if they just say, "It's fine. Biden won." I just want them to consider this matter. Obviously the legislature and the executive branch can't weigh in since both of theirs situations depend upon the outcome. So the Supremes, who aren't affected by the outcome at all since they have lifetime appointments, should examine everything that's happened.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
goodness - aren't you needy :chuckle:
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Um no. Let's instead go back to my comment. Never before has what we did in the ballot box on Election Day been overturned by mail-in ballots. It's fine that a small minority of states have had mail-in voting before, what's not fine that all 50 states made the change all at once, due to a perceived emergency, before we even knew that we were going to be able to have a real Election Day, but we did have one, and the reason that we're here on Friday with the outcome just now becoming clear is because of this change.
I don't remember any other presidential election that needed to wait for the five states with mail-in voting to get their numbers. We've always known, except for 2000, who won. And that was another vote counting issue like this one, except that was limited to one state and we've been waiting on six states since Tuesday.
Also the five states. Typically blue? iow, has there ever been a question in the past say 20 years which way these five states are going to go in a presidential election?
My apologies your majesty, dint realize you're the queen of what's relevant.
Was it free and fair. I want the Supreme Court to weigh in. I'll accept what they say.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Mail-in ballots are part of "what we did in the ballot box."
So mail-in votes aren't fraudulent. Thank you.
Each state makes its decisions. Unfortunately, it seems they didn't check with you.
Somehow I doubt you'll accept anything from anyone unless it shows a Trump win. It isn't going to happen, not in the popular vote, not in the electoral college, not in the Supreme Court. So far, just about every court challenge by the Trump campaign has been shot down.
WonderfulLordJesus
New member
They've all been so abused under Trump, been in real daily peril. They're not sure exactly how, except that Trump allowed airborne microbes that Creepy Joe would have captured, in containers made of recycled milk jugs. So, suppose it only stands to reason their answer lies in a career politician, 47 years in the swamp and a K Street poodle, that worked on legislation that likely locked-up more black people than were slaves in the old south. Makes sense to me. And now with an addled mind. (I think it's the scrambled brain they most relate to, actually.)
They're looking for TDS to go away, not realizing it's a personal problem, not a political one. It's always going to be needy, panties in a bunch and obsessing over each and every little thing they never had any control over, everything totalitarian me, me, me, me, notice me, and whatever demonic activity has turned their frontal lobes to cottage cheese. That's the only explaining of TDS. I learned about Nimrod as a teen, didn't have anything to do with him, either, and I'm having the hardest time mustering any derangement syndrome. You have to hand it to Mr. Trump, to have such enduring power over liberals, but not that it ever takes much. You can say boo, or look at them sideways, they're so needy of incessant approval, and make a lot of them cry.
Wouldn't make much sense. You're right about that. Trump would certainly know better. And here's why he didn't wait...
The federal government doesn't prepare ballots. States do. And so the watermark scheme would have fallen apart because so many people would have known about it, including many democrat officials. It's a fantasy, a story people are telling each other to fend off the reality.