With steel, yes.
Object sexuality - Wikipedia
Bad strawman anyway, romance or lack of has nothing to do with how one is born (heterosexual)
What you find romantic does not necessarily = right, normal or ok.
Could Hugh Hefner & Donald Trump Be Homosexual?
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
With steel, yes.
Object sexuality - Wikipedia
Bad strawman anyway, romance or lack of has nothing to do with how one is born (heterosexual)
What you find romantic does not necessarily = right, normal or ok.
Just like there were no Native Americans before 1507 when Vespucci named North and South America
maybe for you but most people are able to form emotional bonds with others
yes, and most people know which ones are appropriate to go onto marriage and which are not.
Adultery is still a crime in many states, and the penalty for sodomy castration at the country's founding.
But, you all consider 'prejudice' to be simply disagreeing with it, and 'oppression' if one's vote doesn't go to, let's say, gay marriage- as if one is supposed to renounce what their religion dictates to go and cater to you morons
You're just a bunch of crybabies whose idea of persecution is not being sold a gay cake at a visibly Christian bakery.
I mean, why the hell didn't that Muslim bakery get shut down for doing the same thing? You see, you all are also just a bunch of anti-Christians, for the sake of being an enemy to your own countrymen.
That's why you all want to throw them under the bus for aliens and dissolve America into a globalist gig.
I think you ought to put the horn down and recognize that people aren't falling for you're crap anymore, hombre.
glassjester
Well-known member
Haha, right.
Sexual orientation was just undiscovered? Really?
It's a social construct. It hadn't been constructed yet.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
any group of people? :think:
horn said:
hitler and the nazis aren't a group of people?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ClimateSanity
New member
Why are there more homosexual acts within prisons than in the general population if homosexuality is innate and not fluid?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
you identify as heterosexual because that's normal
if you chose to enagage in homosexual sex, you would become a homosexual
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It is although it's darker in the main and more satirical, especially in regards to technology and how elements like social media and "reality" television can potentially be detrimental, sometimes devastatingly. Both series do share story lines that are compelling and make you think though. If only there was more television like that about these days to be honest...
Funnily enough I didn't rate the Christmas episode on first viewing for some reason. On second viewing I thought it was one of the best out of a consistently quality oeuvre...go figure.
Yes, he does, after exhausting all other possibilities and is only "capable" with the aid of a drug that makes the male genitalia capable of being "functional" regardless. Do you think he would have carried on with it if it were a child instead of a pig?
Crucible, just because the "penalty " for "sodomy " used to be castration over 200 years ago doesn't mean it should be so today . It also used to be illegal to teach slaves to read and write before they were freed in 1865 in the south . Blacks and women weren't allowed top vote and blacks and whites were not allowed to marry and so forth .
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, although the comparison is silly anyway.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It's not a case of it being 'missed', it's more a case of it being disregarded for the sheer bunk that it is. The 'argument' that everyone is potentially capable of homosexual attraction or the same in regards to children is just asinine, and that's before anyone could choose to act on them.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No it wasn't. I'm not emotional about being straight. Just the way it is.
Plenty. You?
:idunno:
glassjester
Well-known member
Yes, agreed.
Booo.
On second viewing I thought it was one of the best out of a consistently quality oeuvre...go figure.
Oh, good.
I don't know.
I probably wouldn't have ever watched the show again, if he did.
Maybe he would have been even more unwilling to go through with it.
Again, I'm not arguing that you would actually engage in any of the crimes or perversions mentioned in this thread.
Only that the reason you won't is because you do not want to.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
We agree?! Stop the presses!
Hiss...
It was one of those episodes where you needed to give it your full attention to get the most out of it really, at least in my ever so humble opinion...
I think it's a straight fire bet that he not only would have been unwilling, he just couldn't have done that. No amount of political chicanery could justify the rape of a minor.
I know you aren't, but you need to realize that there are certain things that are impossible for people, in my case being attracted to men or kids in anything like a sexual manner.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Most people don't have a hang up with gay or bisexual people having relationships with the same gender so that isn't helping your argument much if you think it's immoral per se.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, it isn't. Not everyone can be attracted to their own gender and act on non existent desires. Seriously, do the math on this, it's not difficult.