What optics has him looking good, coming to Mass every week basically without fail, to Christ's Church, that openly and to this culture, flagrantly, condemns LGBTQAI+(etc.) "love" as grave matter and even calls it 'disordered'? It's not just that the Church won't marry homo-genital couples---the Church doesn't even bless them. What optics?I was referring to him having been on my radar for the last 45 years.
Or is a venal, career politician who knows the value of the optics.
The optics that counted during his long career as a Senator from Delaware.What optics has him looking good, coming to Mass every week basically without fail, to Christ's Church, that openly and to this culture, flagrantly, condemns LGBTQAI+(etc.) "love" as grave matter and even calls it 'disordered'? It's not just that the Church won't marry homo-genital couples---the Church doesn't even bless them. What optics?
I believe he didJFK hardly ever came to Mass, afaik.
I'd heard otherwise, but I'm curious now so I'll look into it.I believe he did
That's fine. Unlike @Lon, I never believe that you and I have common ground anymore. Not since you've decided to embrace evil.
There is an expectation that values follow faith. For us Protestants, you can argue a bit, sure, but this discussion takes place within Catholic walls and there are certainly conservative Catholics that do and have questioned his faith because of a lot of adverse policies passed.Sure you have. You've heard that he attends Mass weekly, and has for very many years basically without exception. He goes to Mass even when he leaves the country.
In this day and age, there is simply no other good explanation for a Catholic coming to Mass weekly unless he really believes in Jesus Christ.
Thanks for inclusion. While I know I'm ignored, I yet know contributions to threads have an impact as we participate in them in good faith of our values, even when they are not shared. My goal is not liberal, but to bring all people's to Christ. Bantering seldom accomplishes that objective so I'm ever trying to be more irenic. I want none in hell, if I can do anything at all about it.That's fine. Unlike @Lon, I never believe that you and I have common ground anymore. Not since you've decided to embrace evil.
Values follow faith and actions follow valuesThere is an expectation that values follow faith.
Walking it backwards:... a lot of adverse policies passed.
Sure you have. You've heard that he attends Mass weekly, and has for very many years basically without exception. He goes to Mass even when he leaves the country.
In this day and age, there is simply no other good explanation for a Catholic coming to Mass weekly unless he really believes in Jesus Christ.
Asking ridiculous hypotheticals is usually.... ridiculous.It's a fair question, asking if the evangelical outrage over Communion would be the same if Trump was Catholic. I doubt I'll get a fair answer.
They mishandled the scandals?... They allowed priests to abuse children and hid that fact for years and years and years. It was as bad as can be!The Church absolutely mishandled the child abuse scandals.
RCC doctrine is horrible, properly enforced or not.But this isn't about that. This is a doctrinal question, not a law enforcement issue.
You don't think everyone knows that? Of course they know that. The wording was doser's, I used his words in my reply to him.The mishandled the scandals?... They allowed priests to abuse children and hid that fact for years and years and years. It was as bad as can be!
Whatever your opinion is on it, it's doctrinal. And all you who aren't Catholic, who hate/dislike/scorn/whatever Catholicism are here busy discussing a Church matter that normally wouldn't matter to you one whit.RCC doctrine is horrible, properly enforced or not.
I could care less about his inclusion or exclusion... I despise the false RCC doctrine.Whatever your opinion is on it, it's doctrinal.
A false "Church" with false doctrines.And all you who aren't Catholic, who hate/dislike/scorn/whatever Catholicism are here busy discussing a Church matter that normally wouldn't matter to you one whit.
The RCC is a false religion that is very political about lots of things.Again: the bishops don't agree with each other, the Pope has warned the bishops about denying Communion, and this is more political than it is doctrinal or canonical.
Even amongst RC's it's a primarily political issue.Any non-Catholic here discussing whether or not Joe Biden should be receiving Communion who doesn't care about, who scorns what Catholic Communion is all about - doesn't have a religious dog in the fight, only a political fight.
Well looky looky:I believe he did
...In the words of one biographer, Kennedy was Mr. Saturday Night but also Mr. Sunday Morning, rarely missing a Mass....
...Kennedy . . . dutifully attended Easter Mass at a native hut, even as enemy aircraft circled overhead....
...John always hustled off to Mass on Sundays, even while traveling....
He values coming to Mass, and that, barring some convincing evidence that it's just for 'optics', comes from faith.There is an expectation that values follow faith.
His position has been what a lot of Republicans have also offered---something like, I'm personally opposed to it, but I'm not going to try to impose my religion upon the public.For us Protestants, you can argue a bit, sure, but this discussion takes place within Catholic walls and there are certainly conservative Catholics that do and have questioned his faith because of a lot of adverse policies passed.
That's your interpretation. There's really no such thing as a 'really good Catholic', there are just those who maintain full communion and those who don't.Or he's just a really good Catholic (in the sense of following a religion, rather than having an actual relationship with Christ)...
If we examined his personal life, if he weren't a politician, I doubt that anybody would doubt his Christian faith.Also, optics... As doser said.
The kids were the victims most hurt by the child rapists of course. But those people, those violent criminals, took advantage of everybody in order to avoid detection and keep raping kids. There were more victims than the kids, though of course, they were the ones absolutely most harmed....They mishandled the scandals?... They allowed priests to abuse children and hid that fact for years and years and years. It was as bad as can be!
Right, like the Trinity, like Christ's Resurrection being real, like the Second Coming, like abortion and homo-genital relations being grave sins---all horrible.RCC doctrine is horrible, properly enforced or not.
1st Corinthians 10:17 "For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread."...what Catholic Communion is all about....
The Roman Catholic "church" HID those child rapists within the SYSTEM to make sure that the RCC and the child rapists did not face the consequences of their evil actions.The kids were the victims most hurt by the child rapists of course. But those people, those violent criminals, took advantage of everybody in order to avoid detection and keep raping kids. There were more victims than the kids, though of course, they were the ones absolutely most harmed.
I did not say that ALL of their doctrines were incorrect. If ALL of their doctrines were incorrect, no Christian would fall for their story.Right, like the Trinity, like Christ's Resurrection being real, like the Second Coming, like abortion and homo-genital relations being grave sins---all horrible.
Plain.
1st Corinthians 10:17 "For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread."
Among many other things!