GFR7
New member
Thanks for that welcome reminder :wave:Well, bear in mind that most people here - of all stripes and differences share in common that the guy is a nut. Half a dozens short of a six pack etc...
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
- Thread starter aCultureWarrior
- Start date
- Status
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Not anyone, as I'm pretty sure that many who have attempted to defend homosexuality on this thread are practicing heterosexuals (who just happen to have loved ones or friends that are proud and unrepentant homosexuals).
Then there are the obvious ones...
(He's good).
Yet you don't have compassion for other people's children, why's that GFR7?
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Not anyone, as I'm pretty sure that many who have attempted to defend homosexuality on this thread are practicing heterosexuals (who just happen to have loved ones or friends that are proud and unrepentant homosexuals).
Then there are the obvious ones...
(He's good).
Yet you don't have compassion for other people's children, why's that GFR7?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3987772&postcount=1142
Dark Radiance
New member
1. Disease should be criminalized? I seem to have missed that being one of the Christian or even human virtues.
2. As you like to repeat ad nauseum, ACW, "this was covered earlier in the thread". If anyone is interested they can go back and read it. Or you can do your usually pedantic quotes within quotes within quotes.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Typical aCW behaviour:
1 - Tell people to wade through his marathon two and a half year blog for anything that was apparently 'covered earlier'...
2 - Tell people that any pertinent questions will be addressed in an 'upcoming segment' that may take up to 17 years to address...
3 - Make out that anyone who disagrees with his position is probably a 'sodomite' despite that being most of the world's population.
4 - Deflect with a myriad cut 'n' pastes when he's in a corner where he's actually put himself and hope nobody notices...
5 - Well, talk a whole load of crap and hope nobody notices that either so at least he's an optimist...or is that extremist...maybe an optometrist would help him on all of it....
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
1.The disease aspect of homosexuality is only one of the many reasons why it MUST be recriminalized. Keep in mind DR that I haven't even scratched the surface when it comes to the sex habits and the diseases that come with homosexual behavior (to be discussed in detail in the "promiscuity, disease and early death" segment).
2. Are you a "Gay Christian" DR?
This particular behavior that you defend and obviously want to partake in once again has to be the most disease ridden behavior known to mankind.
Regarding Christian virtues: It's difficult at times for me to love you more than you love yourself Dark Radiance, but Jesus Christ demands that of me.
Obviously that would be a "yes".
I'll discuss "Gay (Homosexual) Christians", "Adulterous Christians" and "Incestuous Christians" (hey, why should homosexuals be allowed to mock God and not adulterers and those who engage in incest?) in the "3 tenets of atheism" segment.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
1.The disease aspect of homosexuality is only one of the many reasons why it MUST be recriminalized. Keep in mind DR that I haven't even scratched the surface when it comes to the sex habits and the diseases that come with homosexual behavior (to be discussed in detail in the "promiscuity, disease and early death" segment).
2. Are you a "Gay Christian" DR?
This particular behavior that you defend and obviously want to partake in once again has to be the most disease ridden behavior known to mankind.
Regarding Christian virtues: It's difficult at times for me to love you more than you love yourself Dark Radiance, but Jesus Christ demands that of me.
Obviously that would be a "yes".
I'll discuss "Gay (Homosexual) Christians", "Adulterous Christians" and "Incestuous Christians" (hey, why should homosexuals be allowed to mock God and not adulterers and those who engage in incest?) in the "3 tenets of atheism" segment.
I have talked about the savagery of many American Indian tribes in early America (cannibalism, tribal warfare/slavery) :
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n3p-7_Beary.html
and touched briefly on the subject of how many American Indian tribes are currently embracing homosexual 'marriage' in one of the earlier threads. I think that it's worth looking at the roots of this pagan culture to understand why.
Homosexuals Often Had a High Status in Native American Tribes
Native American males were expected to become warriors and hunters, but it was also recognized that the stress of being under such burdens often demanded spiritual advice and healing.
This duty would usually fall upon a homosexual Shaman. In the Native culture, to be gay meant to be "from the outside world," to be "spiritually gifted." However, Homosexual only included men who preferred social and sexual "female roles."
Needless to say, they were highly respected within the community. In fact, straight men could have sex with a homosexual without having his manhood doubted.
It was actually considered a huge honor to have a Gay lover or "wife," and raised one’s honor in the tribe.
http://www.spirit-alembic.com/ishvara.html
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n3p-7_Beary.html
and touched briefly on the subject of how many American Indian tribes are currently embracing homosexual 'marriage' in one of the earlier threads. I think that it's worth looking at the roots of this pagan culture to understand why.
Homosexuals Often Had a High Status in Native American Tribes
Native American males were expected to become warriors and hunters, but it was also recognized that the stress of being under such burdens often demanded spiritual advice and healing.
This duty would usually fall upon a homosexual Shaman. In the Native culture, to be gay meant to be "from the outside world," to be "spiritually gifted." However, Homosexual only included men who preferred social and sexual "female roles."
Needless to say, they were highly respected within the community. In fact, straight men could have sex with a homosexual without having his manhood doubted.
It was actually considered a huge honor to have a Gay lover or "wife," and raised one’s honor in the tribe.
http://www.spirit-alembic.com/ishvara.html
GFR7
New member
I do have compassion for other people's children, and my program would be a vast, vast improvement on what we have now: All dissent squashed and labeled as hate and bigotry. We would be lucky if half of what I listed were actually implemented. Maybe you are unaware of just how extremely one-sided this all is now in the public schools, colleges, and culture.
alwight
New member
Yes AB is quite right aCW seems to be able to bring together all kinds of people with a whole spectrum of views, in opposition to him personally. The guy's about as slimy and sleazy as it gets.
lain:
GFR7
New member
I wish he could see just how very un-Christian and black-hearted he comes across.Yes AB is quite right aCW seems to be able to bring together all kinds of people with a whole spectrum of views, in opposition to him personally. The guy's about as slimy and sleazy as it gets.
shagster01
New member
shagster01
New member
It's true. He often brings up the fact that homosexuals are only 1% of the population and then accuses half the world of being homosexuals. :juggle:
GFR7
New member
@aCW:
If you want to understand my cultural-reversal idea, see this post from my Regnerus study thread, and what is being accomplished by liberals when there is no counter-balance and compensation such as the one I have suggested:
From the NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE:
Surprise: Pro-Gay-Marriage Christians Reject the Rest of Christian Teaching about Sex and Marriage, Too
http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...-reject-rest-christian-teaching-about-sex-and
If you want to understand my cultural-reversal idea, see this post from my Regnerus study thread, and what is being accomplished by liberals when there is no counter-balance and compensation such as the one I have suggested:
From the NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE:
Surprise: Pro-Gay-Marriage Christians Reject the Rest of Christian Teaching about Sex and Marriage, Too
http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...-reject-rest-christian-teaching-about-sex-and
ever work with a kid with tourette's?
i did
he would make a little grunt at random times - couldn't control it
i suspect acw is doing something like that
best to ignore it :idunno:
Yet you don't have compassion for other people's children, why's that GFR7?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
Well, after encountering a certain extremist mindset of a particular poster here -whose explosion terrified me and taught me a lesson - I am now convinced that a gradual counter-educational movement is the answer.
1. There can be LGBTQ taught in schools, but there must be a counter-teaching just as available and just as strong.
2. People have a right to ban reparative therapy, but a counter-movement has a right to promote it and to fight to repeal those bans.
3. Some Christian Churches want to accept gays, but there must be prominent groups who refuse to do so.
4. Media and entertainment can promote gays, but there must be strong media and film venues which are allowed to show the opposing side.
5. Rules to protect minors must be enforced (vis a vis certain displays at Pride displays) without ruling out the parades altogether.
Have you ever sought psychological help for your sociopathic disorder?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
Well, after encountering a certain extremist mindset of a particular poster here -whose explosion terrified me and taught me a lesson - I am now convinced that a gradual counter-educational movement is the answer.
1. There can be LGBTQ taught in schools, but there must be a counter-teaching just as available and just as strong.
2. People have a right to ban reparative therapy, but a counter-movement has a right to promote it and to fight to repeal those bans.
3. Some Christian Churches want to accept gays, but there must be prominent groups who refuse to do so.
4. Media and entertainment can promote gays, but there must be strong media and film venues which are allowed to show the opposing side.
5. Rules to protect minors must be enforced (vis a vis certain displays at Pride displays) without ruling out the parades altogether.
Have you ever sought psychological help for your sociopathic disorder?
GFR7
New member
I don't have one; Please seek help for your own.
2% (or more depending on how recruitment goes at Chuck E. Cheese birthday parties or McDonald's Playlands on any given day).
I brought up in an earlier post in this thread that I find it...ahem...'queer' that in other forums those who engage in homosexual behavior are proud of it, but for some reason very few that post frequently in this thread admit it.
A person with an ounce of common sense would know that a 43 year old bachelor from Great Britain who has never married, never talks about dating females, tells children that homosexuality is ok as long as two people love each other, and has no problem with homosexual pornography without a doubt is a limp wrister.
Or a sociopath from New York who has started dozens of homosexual threads in the short time he's been on TOL but has never been seen as a threat by TOL's homosexualists (because they know that he's one of them).
Or a supposedly married drug addict from Colorado who admits that he doesn't even sleep in the same room as his wife, but incessantly defends homosexual behavior.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out 1+1=2 Doper.
On that note: Tis time to return to the segment on homosexual violence, i.e. serial killers.
shagster01
New member
I'm not sure where you think I said I don't sleep in the same bed as my wife because I most certainly do.
So not only do you say only 2% of the population is gay and then accuse half of it of being so, but you also complain that homosexuals flaunt their lifestyle in public too much and then claim half the people here are all in the closet and not admitting in public that we are gay. I see how your argument changes to suit your point.
GFR7
New member
Maybe I'm not a threat because there aren't any gay people on here (save for Tracer Bullet, who is gone, but she argued with me incessantly). Even if there were, how could I or you possibly pose a threat to them?
What would my motive be, as a gay man, to come on here and talk down gay marriage and the rainbow agenda? What would I be accomplishing? You don't even make sense. Just say that my approach is different to yours, and be done with it. Your conspiracy theories carry no weight as they are not believable.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior:
2% (or more depending on how recruitment goes at Chuck E. Cheese birthday parties or McDonald's Playlands on any given day).
I brought up in an earlier post in this thread that I find it...ahem...'queer' that in other forums those who engage in homosexual behavior are proud of it, but for some reason very few that post frequently in this thread admit it.
A person with an ounce of common sense would know that a 43 year old bachelor from Great Britain who has never married, never talks about dating females, tells children that homosexuality is ok as long as two people love each other, and has no problem with homosexual pornography without a doubt is a limp wrister.
Or a sociopath from New York who has started dozens of homosexual threads in the short time he's been on TOL but has never been seen as a threat by TOL's homosexualists (because they know that he's one of them).
Or a supposedly married drug addict from Colorado who admits that he doesn't even sleep in the same room as his wife, but incessantly defends homosexual behavior.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out 1+1=2 Doper.
You had stated it elsewhere. That being said, it appears that there is room for 3 of you in your bed.
The CDC stated that.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kristi...hanks-media-americans-think-number-13-times-h
Do I need to call Ron Paul and buy some acid from him in order to understand your attempt at logic Doper?
My point is: It would be nice if those that incessantly defend buggery in this thread would at least admit that they're proud and unrepentant homosexuals.
Do tell us what personal interest you have in keeping homosexuality and abortion legal Doper.
2% (or more depending on how recruitment goes at Chuck E. Cheese birthday parties or McDonald's Playlands on any given day).
I brought up in an earlier post in this thread that I find it...ahem...'queer' that in other forums those who engage in homosexual behavior are proud of it, but for some reason very few that post frequently in this thread admit it.
A person with an ounce of common sense would know that a 43 year old bachelor from Great Britain who has never married, never talks about dating females, tells children that homosexuality is ok as long as two people love each other, and has no problem with homosexual pornography without a doubt is a limp wrister.
Or a sociopath from New York who has started dozens of homosexual threads in the short time he's been on TOL but has never been seen as a threat by TOL's homosexualists (because they know that he's one of them).
Or a supposedly married drug addict from Colorado who admits that he doesn't even sleep in the same room as his wife, but incessantly defends homosexual behavior.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out 1+1=2 Doper.
You had stated it elsewhere. That being said, it appears that there is room for 3 of you in your bed.
The CDC stated that.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kristi...hanks-media-americans-think-number-13-times-h
Do I need to call Ron Paul and buy some acid from him in order to understand your attempt at logic Doper?
My point is: It would be nice if those that incessantly defend buggery in this thread would at least admit that they're proud and unrepentant homosexuals.
Do tell us what personal interest you have in keeping homosexuality and abortion legal Doper.
Enacting righteous laws is a threat to those that engage in criminal behavior.
Who knows what goes through the mind of a sociopath? Perhaps this is just a little game for you sitting in your office/apartment/house pretending to be something that you're not.
Your approach to dealing with this cancer that our society is currently afflicted with is as limp wristed as the wrists that you're typing with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
Well, after encountering a certain extremist mindset of a particular poster here -whose explosion terrified me and taught me a lesson - I am now convinced that a gradual counter-educational movement is the answer.
1. There can be LGBTQ taught in schools, but there must be a counter-teaching just as available and just as strong.
2. People have a right to ban reparative therapy, but a counter-movement has a right to promote it and to fight to repeal those bans.
3. Some Christian Churches want to accept gays, but there must be prominent groups who refuse to do so.
4. Media and entertainment can promote gays, but there must be strong media and film venues which are allowed to show the opposing side.
5. Rules to protect minors must be enforced (vis a vis certain displays at Pride displays) without ruling out the parades altogether.
Gee, I don't understand why Art Brain, the Doper, Dark Radiance and so many other homosexualists here on TOL don't see you as a threat to their lifestyle.
- Status