Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Yes, the lives of all Americans would be better once these crimes against humanity are recriminalized. Thanks for acknowledging that GFR7.

So explain in detail how your "alternative route" would defeat this evil movement, because this response isn't a response at all.





Have you ever considered a frontal lobotomy sugar?

(Life is one big essay for this sodomite).

You're just mad that you can't write like I can, Iron Closet,
and that I'm the one riding the bicycle, Daddy (Karl).

 

[Nazaroo]

You make some excellent points there Naz, as I have documented how many police depts. allow their high ranking officials and officers to march in gay pride parades. That doesn't mean that the institution itself is corrupt.

Not sure I can follow that logic.
There is no such thing as a 'dept' anymore than there is a 'corporation'.

These are lawyers' fictions designed to protect criminals like policy setters
and CEOs and share-holders (owners) from being morally and financially
responsible for their decisions, and from the proper consequences
of what they do while hiding behind anonymity.

Its not the "department" that 'allows' a police chief to be a queer,
its a bunch of queers who control the strings behind the scenes
that deliberately hire queers, using their Freemasonic connections,
to circumvent public transparency and voting power.

Romans 13:4.

We'll talk about Romans in another thread.

Let's work together to return to a time when
a police officer was held in high esteem
except by those that partake in criminal activity.

This is exactly where I want to go.

But I know it can't be done without rounding up all the rich queers
and publicly executing them, and starting all over again with honest folks.

Get a .38 special to me, and we can get started.

 

[Arthur Brain]

2% (or more depending on how recruitment goes at Chuck E. Cheese birthday parties or McDonald's Playlands on any given day).

I brought up in an earlier post in this thread that I find it...ahem...'queer' that in other forums those who engage in homosexual behavior are proud of it, but for some reason very few that post frequently in this thread admit it.

Hmm, probably because very few who actually post in this thread are actually homosexual. As mentioned before, you're considered a crank by most here from all sorts of differing opinions...

A person with an ounce of common sense would know that a 43 year old bachelor from Great Britain who has never married, never talks about dating females, tells children that homosexuality is ok as long as two people love each other, and has no problem with homosexual pornography without a doubt is a limp wrister.

You could at least get my age right if nothing else Connie, or is maths as difficult for you as common sense? I'm 42, you know, that beloved age you keep bringing up? You also know nothing about my private life and relationships as I've informed you already. Slimy little cretins like you don't get any personal details and you also don't get to see any details in public either. Your little deflection about 'homosexual pornography' didn't specify the prevalent male heterosexual attraction to attractive women only in regards to such, which you "cunningly" failed to not only mention but address when it's been brought up before.

Other than that, pretty much business as usual from you, though given the kind of business I'm referring to your thread was pretty much mired in toilets from the get go...

 

[resurrected]

looks like artie's been hitting the sauce again

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
You make some excellent points there Naz, as I have documented how many police depts. allow their high ranking officials and officers to march in gay pride parades. That doesn't mean that the institution itself is corrupt.

Not sure I can follow that logic.
There is no such thing as a 'dept' anymore than there is a 'corporation'.

There is much work to be done to return to the days of this:

These are lawyers' fictions designed to protect criminals like policy setters
and CEOs and share-holders (owners) from being morally and financially
responsible for their decisions, and from the proper consequences
of what they do while hiding behind anonymity.

Its not the "department" that 'allows' a police chief to be a queer,
its a bunch of queers who control the strings behind the scenes
that deliberately hire queers, using their Freemasonic connections,
to circumvent public transparency and voting power.

(I was so hoping that this post would be conspiracy free. Those darn Freemasons!).


Quote:
Romans 13:4.

We'll talk about Romans in another thread.

It's self explanatory.

Quote:
Let's work together to return to a time when
a police officer was held in high esteem
except by those that partake in criminal activity.

This is exactly where I want to go.

But I know it can't be done without rounding up all the rich queers
and publicly executing them, and starting all over again with honest folks.

Get a .38 special to me, and we can get started.

Careful Naz, GFR7 just put on a fresh pair of panties and with that talk he'll be needing another pair.

 

[GFR7]

Careful Naz, GFR7 just put on a fresh pair of panties and with that talk he'll be needing another pair.

It would be to my advantage, and my son's, to live in the Norman Rockwell world. That is the kind I wanted in my childhood, and didn't get (like most of the rest of my generation). We were born into a world we never made. Thanks for the compassion. Jesus would be proud of you.

 

[GFR7]

This is exactly where I want to go.

But I know it can't be done without rounding up all the rich queers
and publicly executing them, and starting all over again with honest folks.

Get a .38 special to me, and we can get started.

Is this really a feasible plan?

And what has held you back all of these years, and things deteriorated around you?

Do you really want to adopt the Iran model of dealing with the "sodomites"?
And is this a Christian stance?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It would be to my advantage, and my son's, to live in the Norman Rockwell world. That is the kind I wanted in my childhood, and didn't get (like most of the rest of my generation)...

Thank you for acknowledging once again that righteous laws are needed to return to a time that embraced decency.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Do you really want to adopt the Iran model of dealing with the "sodomites"?
And is this a Christian stance?

Typical queer fear mongering (the Human Rights Campaign would be proud of you GFR7).

 

[GFR7]

Typical queer fear mongering (the Human Rights Campaign would be proud of you GFR7).

No, this is a picture which appeared with an article from The Daily Beast, which came into my newsfeed.

If one is going to entertain the killing of gay people, why be afraid to look at what this would really entail? For my part, it is never, ever the way to go.

 

[GFR7]

Thank you for acknowledging once again that righteous laws are needed to return to a time that embraced decency.

It would have been far easier to KEEP those laws and to KEEP people decent, than to have gone 5 decades down this road. It wouldn't be the same, because America is now peopled by different beings. There is no return, because things were allowed to change. Why did you allow this to happen?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Thank you for acknowledging once again that righteous laws are needed to return to a time that embraced decency.

It would have been far easier to KEEP those laws and to KEEP people decent, than to have gone 5 decades down this road. It wouldn't be the same, because America is now peopled by different beings. There is no return, because things were allowed to change. Why did you allow this to happen?

Yet you state that you have a "counter movement that will push back at twice the force that will end up swallowing the movement that they are pushing at".

You never heard of Ortega y Gasset's frontal attack?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006573&postcount=1440

(So many schizophrenic personalities, so little internet space to share them on).

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Thank you for acknowledging once again that righteous laws are needed to return to a time that embraced decency.




Yet you state that you have a "counter movement that will push back at twice the force that will end up swallowing the movement that they are pushing at".

You never heard of Ortega y Gasset's frontal attack?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006573&postcount=1440

(So many schizophrenic personalities, so little internet space to share them on).

I am saying from YOUR perspective. YOU don't believe in my counter-movement frontal attack. :AMR1:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior View Post
Typical queer fear mongering (the Human Rights Campaign would be proud of you GFR7).

No, this is a picture which appeared with an article from The Daily Beast, which came into my newsfeed.

If one is going to entertain the killing of gay people, why be afraid to look at what this would really entail? For my part, it is never, ever the way to go.

Once homosexuality, abortion, pornography and other sexual sins that have devastated society are recriminalized, would you not agree that the death penalty in certain cases should be used against those homosexuals that have caused the death of innocent children?

Take for instance this evil evil person:

While he was undoubtedly raped by a homosexual Catholic priest as a child, which lead him to a homosexual lifestyle and the HATRED of God, Dan Savage has lead countless young people astray through his sex column in The Stranger, through his "It Gets Better Project" and through his numerous speaking engagements.

Would you be against executing one of your fellow sodomites for the harm that he's done to innocent youth and society in general?

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior View Post
Typical queer fear mongering (the Human Rights Campaign would be proud of you GFR7).




Once homosexuality, abortion, pornography and other sexual sins that have devastated society are recriminalized, would you not agree that the death penalty in certain cases should be used against those homosexuals that have caused the death of innocent children?

Take for instance this evil evil person:

While he was undoubtedly raped by a homosexual Catholic priest as a child, which lead him to a homosexual lifestyle and the HATRED of God, Dan Savage has lead countless young people astray through his sex column in The Stranger, through his "It Gets Better Project" and through his numerous speaking engagements.

Would you be against executing one of your fellow sodomites for the harm that he's done to innocent youth and society in general?

I don't HAVE any "fellow Sodomites" because I am not gay.

But yes, if there really were a regime which came in and had the power, unopposed, to do these things, in some cases execution (although I would likely prefer a prison sentence) would be called for.

However, on my list would be many radical feminist thinkers, and many entertainment people (such as those who made the movie, "Wild Things", and many others, especially those who attempted to slip "soft porn" into regular tv programming, and were actual child molesters, in my book - execution for these last, yes).

Savage I would say could be re-educated. He got on so well with Brian Brown.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Once homosexuality, abortion, pornography and other sexual sins that have devastated society are recriminalized, would you not agree that the death penalty in certain cases should be used against those homosexuals that have caused the death of innocent children?

Take for instance this evil evil person:

While he was undoubtedly raped by a homosexual Catholic priest as a child, which lead him to a homosexual lifestyle and the HATRED of God, Dan Savage has lead countless young people astray through his sex column in The Stranger, through his "It Gets Better Project" and through his numerous speaking engagements.

Would you be against executing one of your fellow sodomites for the harm that he's done to innocent youth and society in general?

Savage I would say could be re-educated. He got on so well with Brian Brown.

So you would overlook the fact that Dan Savage has lead countless innocent youth to their death and disregard the death penalty for someone who committed capital crimes?

I see that you're quite impressed with Brian Brown for dining with Dan Savage and his 'husband' Terry Miller.

I addressed the meeting several pages back, but you didn't respond. Care to now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
I am curious to hear your thoughts on why you believe Brown handled this opportunity badly?

I watched it when it was live, and sent him an email congratulations at the end,
because I felt he came off beautifully, and that his arguments and scholarship were sound (on the video, he looked patriarchal,
while Savage looked adolescent.)


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Brian Brown, the President and co-founder of the National Organization of Marriage, went into the home of one of the sickest perverts known to mankind (Dan Savage) and not only dined and laughed with him, but debated him on various topics that were irrelevant to homosexuality.

To my knowledge, pro lifers have never met with pro abortionists and debated, why would Brown lower himself and give a certain amount of validity to a pervert like Dan Savage?

If Brown really wanted to destroy Savage and his message, all he would have had to have done is to show the disease that runs rampant amongst those that engage in homosexual behavior. Brown then could have put the final nail in the proverbial coffin by showing how the homosexual movement (Dan Savage included) indoctrinate innocent children to accept homosexuality as something normal.

So needless to say, Brian Brown of NOM isn't someone that should be fighting this aspect of the culture war.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3987757&postcount=1140

 

[GFR7]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Once homosexuality, abortion, pornography and other sexual sins that have devastated society are recriminalized, would you not agree that the death penalty in certain cases should be used against those homosexuals that have caused the death of innocent children?

Take for instance this evil evil person:

While he was undoubtedly raped by a homosexual Catholic priest as a child, which lead him to a homosexual lifestyle and the HATRED of God, Dan Savage has lead countless young people astray through his sex column in The Stranger, through his "It Gets Better Project" and through his numerous speaking engagements.

Would you be against executing one of your fellow sodomites for the harm that he's done to innocent youth and society in general?



So you would overlook the fact that Dan Savage has lead countless innocent youth to their death and disregard the death penalty for someone who committed capital crimes?

I see that you're quite impressed with Brian Brown for dining with Dan Savage and his 'husband' Terry Miller.

I addressed the meeting several pages back, but you didn't respond. Care to now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
I am curious to hear your thoughts on why you believe Brown handled this opportunity badly?

I watched it when it was live, and sent him an email congratulations at the end,
because I felt he came off beautifully, and that his arguments and scholarship were sound (on the video, he looked patriarchal,
while Savage looked adolescent.)


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Brian Brown, the President and co-founder of the National Organization of Marriage, went into the home of one of the sickest perverts known to mankind (Dan Savage) and not only dined and laughed with him, but debated him on various topics that were irrelevant to homosexuality.

To my knowledge, pro lifers have never met with pro abortionists and debated, why would Brown lower himself and give a certain amount of validity to a pervert like Dan Savage?

If Brown really wanted to destroy Savage and his message, all he would have had to have done is to show the disease that runs rampant amongst those that engage in homosexual behavior. Brown then could have put the final nail in the proverbial coffin by showing how the homosexual movement (Dan Savage included) indoctrinate innocent children to accept homosexuality as something normal.

So needless to say, Brian Brown of NOM isn't someone that should be fighting this aspect of the culture war.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3987757&postcount=1140

Well, I was sort of joking about Savage. I think Brian Brown had to "face facts" about what people would and would not accept as true, regardless of the actual facts. Savage was the one who invited Brown, and I think he regretted it. He said Brown "threw him off" by sitting and eating the food they had prepared. Savage's "husband" later said Brown was like "a Nazi".

But there are horrible evils which have damaged children since the 1980s, outside of the strictly gay camp. I am still stunned that no harm befell these people.

What do you mean, "Don't alter my user name"???

 

[Heterodoxical]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Anyone who truly loves his neighbor would legislate righteous laws to protect them from this extremely harmful behavior known as homosexuality.

Keep up the good work kiddo.




I guess that's up to them. Keep in mind that the purpose behind jails is to punish people that have broken the law.

But then again, not everyone that committed acts of homosexuality have gone to jail. Take for instance this young teen who probably was repeatedly raped by an older homosexual as a youth and hence became sexually confused:

He doesn't need to be punished, he needs therapy.

Why won't you and your kind allow these morally confused people to get the help that they need Doper?

You sure do collect a lot of GAY BOY pictures. It's nice to know you have a "TYPE" cw.

If I buy you a doorknob will you come out of the closet and shut up?

 

[Heterodoxical]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Thank you for acknowledging once again that righteous laws are needed to return to a time that embraced decency.




Yet you state that you have a "counter movement that will push back at twice the force that will end up swallowing the movement that they are pushing at".

You never heard of Ortega y Gasset's frontal attack?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006573&postcount=1440

(So many schizophrenic personalities, so little internet space to share them on).

How long have you supported Sharia law over the Bible?

How long have you supported terrorists over LGBT community?

What does that say about you?

Your idea of GOD is very self serving. How long have you held GOD On a chain like that.

 

[GFR7]

aCW:

When we see this headline changed from this:

27 men arrested in Lebanon for alleged ‘unnatural sex’ and ‘public indecency’

To this:

107,000 Men arrested in Kentucky for alleged 'unnatural sex' and 'public indeceny':

a Culture Warrior Holds AP Press Conference: Matt Barber, Peter LaBarbera in attendance

Associated Press: aCW speaks before journalists after being lauded by police, LaBarbera

Then I will know your program is working :BRAVO: