Why Calvinist Cannot Defend Their Doctrine of a Limited Atonement

[Bright Raven]

I have a dozen or so threads on it!

A sentence or two would be fine thanks.

 

[beloved57]

In other words, you do not know what it means.

Yeah I do, read my Threads! You don't know what it means nor do you believe it!

 

[beloved57]

A sentence or two would be fine thanks.

My threads meet that criteria!

 

[Bright Raven]

Yeah I do, read my Threads! You don't know what it means nor do you believe it!

If you are not willing to post a sentence or two, you don't know.

 

[beloved57]

If you are not willing to post a sentence or two, you don't know.

I have a dozen or more threads on it! You are a pretender!

 

[Bright Raven]

I have a dozen or more threads on it! You are a pretender!

Yet, you do not want to post One little sentence to prove your point.

 

[beloved57]

Yet, you do not want to post One little sentence to prove your point.

I have already explained my points on that, why didn't you read them?

 

[Bright Raven]

I have already explained my points on that, why didn't you read them?

And yet are not willing to post them.

 

[beloved57]

And yet are not willing to post them.

You are not sincere because they were already posted by me !

 

[Bright Raven]

You are not sincere because they were already posted by me !

I'm not going to go searching for your answers. You should be willing to post a sentence or two to prove your point. Since you don't, I can only assume that you can't.

 

[beloved57]

I'm not going to go searching for your answers. You should be willing to post a sentence or two to prove your point. Since you don't, I can only assume that you can't.

Then you are not sincere in wanting to know my explanation!

 

[Bright Raven]

Then you are not sincere in wanting to know my explanation!

You can't give one.

 

[beloved57]

You can't give one.

I have explained it over a dozen times before, why didn't you read them?

 

[Bright Raven]

I have explained it over a dozen times before, why didn't you read them?

Explain it in one or two sentences and I will be satisfied.

 

[Robert Pate]

Explain it in one or two sentences and I will be satisfied.

When confronted with truth he bows out.

There will be no bowing out in the judgment.

 

[beloved57]

When confronted with truth he bows out.

There will be no bowing out in the judgment.

I have explained that verse up to two dozen times in all kind of different ways and he has ignored them ! So have you !

 

[Bright Raven]

I have explained that verse up to two dozen times in all kind of different ways and he has ignored them ! So have you !

If you have done it that many times why is it so difficult to do it once more or give a link to one you have already posted.

 

[Robert Pate]

If you have done it that many times why is it so difficult to do it once more or give a link to one you have already posted.

B57 has left the building.

 

[beloved57]

Maybe explain your thought process then? If you can't it may be because it's illogical so people can't follow it.

My thought process is set forth in my threads and posts, read them or not !

 

[Robert Pate]

My thought process is set forth in my threads and posts, read them or not !

The fact remains. You cannot defend the doctrine of a limited atonement, simply because there is no scripture that supports a limited atonement.

There are dozens and dozens of scriptures that support an unlimited atonement. Here is just one, 1 John 2:2.

So you are left with a choice. You can call the apostle John a liar. You can call the Bible a liar. Or you can just ignore this post.