The similarities between chimpanzees and humans are amazing, AND the difference reflect differences in ancestral environment.In what way does mapping the human genome and comparing it with other animals corroborate evolution?
The similarities between chimpanzees and humans are amazing, AND the difference reflect differences in ancestral environment.In what way does mapping the human genome and comparing it with other animals corroborate evolution?
No content from you AGAIN... you're nothing but a TROLL.You are an amazing gymnast, but for all our sakes, I hope you forego the tights.
Same Creator.The similarities between chimpanzees and humans are amazing,
Prove that it's due to ancestry. You cannot.AND the difference reflect differences in ancestral environment.
That's not a scientific termThe similarities between chimpanzees and humans are amazing
, AND the difference reflect differences in ancestral environment.
They share a common ancestor. Fossils unearthed in Kenya in 2014 have even revealed what the common ancestor looked like,Same Creator.
Prove that it's due to ancestry. You cannot.
Dream on.They share a common ancestor.
You see what you want to see, but are blind to the truth.Fossils unearthed in Kenya in 2014 have revealed what the common ancestor looked like,
Unprovable speculationThey share a common ancestor.
They were able to sequence the genome of the fossils unearthed in Kenya in 2014?Fossils unearthed in Kenya in 2014 have even revealed what the common ancestor looked like,
And yet angels are created beings; therefore they had to come into being after the creation had begun.
The term "day" when given "morning and evening" clearly indicates a normal earth rotation.
You believe that our ancestors looked like rocks?Fossils ... have ... revealed what the common ancestor looked like ...
Do you acknowledge that gene similarity between people indicate a familial connection? If Yes, then why don't you believe a 98.6% similarity between species represents an ancestral connection?That's not a scientific term
And you haven't demonstrated why similarities are evidence of evolution
Angels are CREATED BEINGS... are they not?“Who is this that obscures my plans with words without knowledge? Brace yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer me.
“Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation? Tell me, if you understand. Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know! Who stretched a measuring line across it? On what were its footings set, or who laid its cornerstone - while the morning stars sang together and all the angels[a] shouted for joy?" - Job 38:2-7
If you cannot understand something so basic as that... I will not try to help you further.Why? Explain, please.
We already KNOW that they are BOTH human.Do you acknowledge that gene similarity between people indicate a familial connection?
Because we do NOT know if there is actually an "ancestral connection".If Yes, then why don't you believe a 98.6% similarity between species represents an ancestral connection?
You jumped the gun again- this time by mere seconds. Patience is a virtue.No content from you AGAIN... you're nothing but a TROLL.
I responded to YOUR POST.You jumped the gun again- this time by mere seconds. Patience is a virtue.
You are an amazing gymnast, but for all our sakes, I hope you forego the tights.
If DNA is examined at a crime scene we often do not know ahead of time if it is human DNA. We conclude that it is if we find it is similar enough to what we recognize as human. So, by extension we can conclude with a large degree of confidence how closely related two species are to one and other.We already KNOW that they are BOTH human.
Because we do NOT know if there is actually an "ancestral connection".
Quit trying to CHANGE the CONTEXT. You said "gene similarity between people".If DNA is examined at a crime scene we often do not know ahead of time if it is human DNA.
Not true, but I know that you must cling to it.We conclude that it is if we find it is similar enough to what we recognize as human. So, by extension we can conclude with a large degree of confidence how closely related two species are to one and other.
Yes, but I had already responded to your question within a response to doser.I responded to YOUR POST.
So what? Your reply to ME was void of any merit and I said so.Yes, but I had already responded to your question within a response to doser.
AND, the other time you called me a troll, I responded to your post quite fully within a few hours of your post. You should already know that I respond substantially by now even though, levity is mixed in, should you not? Patience is a virtue.So what? Your reply to ME was void of any merit and I said so.
Your "substance" is not so substantive.AND, the other time you called me a troll, I responded to your post quite fully within a few hours of your post. You should already know that I respond substantially by now even though, levity is mixed in, should you not? Patience is a virtue.
In contrast, your buddy doser is notorious for all snark and little substance.