What happens if a woman with a curable disease doesn't have the money for the treatment?
Trumpcare
- Thread starter patrick jane
- Start date
What happens if a woman with a curable disease doesn't have the money for the treatment?
Ah, yes, even defeat a great victory. Cling to that, since your champion can't seem to get a victory without a defeat.
Trumpers will be saved from confronting the failure of their man because articles like this can paper over them until they forget that they ever happened.
ClimateSanity
New member
ClimateSanity
New member
I know you want to see defeat. Truth is, that's a brilliant plan to get all sides to give in some.
Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
That also sounds potentially expensive.
Tell me that in four years. You realize Trump promised repeal and replace on day 1, right?
:mock: self employed
Because they suck at winning elections, as I just said.
At this point in Obama's first term, they'd passed Obamacare and a massive stimulus package. Both were incredibly controversial, both were a major legislative push. And it's because they had the discipline for the actual legislative process. What Paul Ryan tried to do this week, and what Trump tried to do, isn't legislating. I'm not sure what it was. It was pathetic. They hid it in the basement, they jammed it through committees, they limited debate. They tried to call a vote that was full of aggrieved symbolism, they completely ignored the other side, they barely compromised with their own members, and the result was a bill that was objectively horrible and hurt most of the country. That bill was so bad that Congress is nearly twice as popular. And all for a bill that was destined to die in the Senate.
The Repeal and Replace rhetoric were with dishonest, insincere, or perhaps just unvetted. The math is horrendous.
A product of the devil. Civil court should not exist. But it does because we have an extremely corrupt system.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
As I was searching for "all cases criminal and civil are to be decided by trial by jury" I was bombarded with how the Supreme Court has supposedly single handedly amended the constitution to make jury trials non-mandatory.
Civil court is fine, it is the cases that certain judges allow in that is corrupt.
Course it would be a righteous place indeed if they were not needed. :cheers:
You realize that there's more to moral discourse than simply arbitrarily declaring what you dislike "of the devil" and leaving it there. Right? No?
According to the jovial demoncrats, it was a great day for "the people"
We got to witness the Art of the Deal in action yesterday. It might be more accurately call the Art of Blame Everyone Else and Run Away.
That actually reads like a description of Trump's other fraud - his life as a so called big time real estate developer
The reality?
Not only did he never complete his education at Wharton, but many of his classmates long since left him in the dust of their $Billions.
Trump fools have bought into his quest to make himself famous.
His classmates followed in the tradition of their families' practice.
The practice of quietly continuing building the kind of massively massive wealth that allows such to buy a Trump on a whim, should they so choose, but ten times over, and then some, without even beginning to tap their massive fortunes.
Well, he just ran into some just like that - in the person of the ever behind the scenes Koch Brothers.
The man is...a fraud who is laughed at by such families.
Of course, the Trump drones are already rationalizing that Trump is the one who ended up with the last laugh.
Sit back, kid, we're only seeing the beginning of this comedy of errors that is their self-induced Trump admini-frustration :chuckle:
As of 2016, Trump and his businesses had been involved in more than 3,500 state and federal legal actions.
Trump or one of his companies was the plaintiff in 1,900 cases and the defendant in 1,450.
You bet