Pride in what you think America used to be. Fear about the changes you see. Anger against those you think are causing those changes.How is "Make America Great Again" anger, pride, and fear?
Did you read the article rex posted?
Pride in what you think America used to be. Fear about the changes you see. Anger against those you think are causing those changes.How is "Make America Great Again" anger, pride, and fear?
Pride in what you think America used to be. Fear about the changes you see. Anger against those you think are causing those changes.
Did you read the article rex posted?
Really?
Specifically?
From the article:
The key similarity is the emotional strategy and, specifically, the way in which both maestros of rhetoric exploited the primal emotions of Pride, Fear and Anger.
Pride in what you think America used to be. Fear about the changes you see. Anger against those you think are causing those changes.
Did you read the article rex posted?
There is nothing inherently wrong in pride, anger, and fear. And anyone running for office will have a message that at least implicitly carries dissatisfaction with how things are currently going. So yes I imagine that Obama's message had some pride, anger, and fear too. I think the important differences would be in what your proposed solutions are and the primary focus of your message. My feeling is that it's fair to say that Trump's campaign was more based on anger and fear than Obama's and some of Trump's solutions went against values that I care about.you don't think bammy played to pride in what america could become?
fear about what it had become under the evil genius moron george w bush?
anger about what bush had led the country to?
There is nothing inherently wrong in pride, anger, and fear. And anyone running for office will have a message that at least implicitly carries dissatisfaction with how things are currently going. So yes I imagine that Obama's message had some pride, anger, and fear too. I think the important differences would be in what your proposed solutions are and the primary focus of your message. My feeling is that it's fair to say that Trump's campaign was more based on anger and fear than Obama's and some of Trump's solutions went against values that I care about.
...some of Trump's solutions went against values that I care about.
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has deported 240,255 immigrants over the past 12 months, a 2 percent increase over 2015. http://www.wral.com/us-deportations-of-illegal-immigrants-up-2-percent/16386143/ |
trump didn't mask his feelings or his intents
why?
because he's not trained to do so, as a lawyer or a politician
bammy played to the same themes and generated the same enthusiasms, but he did it subtly, in a hidden manner
you know - like a sneaky scumbag
this is why trump's message resonated - he let it all hang out
That's why I told my father to be sure to leave me a million or two, so I can be a real working class man. lain:I think Trump resonated because he's real.
A working class man.
Like most working class, salt of the earth, bring your lunch pail men do.He has 23,000 employees.
He plays monopoly with real pieces and isn't averse to shafting the actual working class man when it suits him.He could just sell out and be a man of leisure but he attacks the World 20 hours a day 7 days a week.
Another rich guy moving pieces on a board. Another guy with some unfortunate tendencies who mostly hid them and who didn't feel compelled to literally tell everyone how much smarter he was in their wheelhouse.Who was Romney? Some kind of Corporate Raider?
How many people really understand how Trump got his?How many people really understood how Romney got his money?
Like suggesting a guy who has his millions scattered across enough companies is actually a small investor.Trump is a small businessman
Trump mostly resonated with angry and fearful white people, especially with those who lacked college education., that resonates alot with other small businessmen.
Trump mostly resonated with angry and fearful white people, especially with those who lacked college education.
How'd it work out?That's why I told my father to be sure to leave me a million or two, so I can be a real working class man. lain:
He eats taco bowls form the grill downstairs, just like anyone else that walks in and orders one.Like most working class, salt of the earth, bring your lunch pail men do.
He employees 23,000 working class men and women. How is employing someone shafting them?He plays monopoly with real pieces and isn't averse to shafting the actual working class man when it suits him.
But he lost.Another rich guy moving pieces on a board. Another guy with some unfortunate tendencies who mostly hid them and who didn't feel compelled to literally tell everyone how much smarter he was in their wheelhouse.
Hotels and casinos are pretty easy to relate to.How many people really understand how Trump got his?
Well he is, just over and over again.Like suggesting a guy who has his millions scattered across enough companies is actually a small investor.
Why didn't anyone else think of that? Didn't Hillary have people in charge of thinking of things?Trump mostly resonated with angry and fearful white people, especially with those who lacked college education.
Trump mostly resonated with angry and fearful white people, especially with those who lacked college education.
specifically?
deportation of illegals?
(this was on the cbc this morning):
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has deported 240,255 immigrants over the past 12 months, a 2 percent increase over 2015.
http://www.wral.com/us-deportations-of-illegal-immigrants-up-2-percent/16386143/
I've been concerned about what he's said about foreign/military policy. Like torture, nuclear weapons. He seems willing to judge our actions based on what our enemies do instead of the values we should have. He seems to treat alliances as nothing more than a business deal.Which solutions?
I can understand having some reservations about all that. I think "Crazy Trump" is just his beginning position for negotiations.I've been concerned about what he's said about foreign/military policy. Like torture, nuclear weapons. He seems willing to judge our actions based on what our enemies do instead of the values we should have.
Well, there is money involved. And we don't have any to be spreading around if it's not needed or effective.He seems to treat alliances as nothing more than a business deal.