toldailytopic: Same-sex marriage: for it, or against it?

[Silent Hunter]

Seriously Chrysostom, you lost this discussion 40 pages ago. Repeating the same questions over and over again does not help your cause, it only demonstrates that you are unable to actually argue your case so you will rather keep disrupting with asking the same questions over and over again.

. . .

Allowing homosexual marriage does nothing to hurt children. Not to mention the fact that homosexual couples also takes care of children and they seem to be capable of doing it well.

. . . indeed . . .

Maia Brewton . . . "Maia married her partner, Lara Spotts, in 2008. The couple have twin boys, Rizzo and Calder."

 

[bybee]

so you are not worried about the children?

I take serious umbrage at your question to me. It is asinine and specious given the tenor of my posts over the years here.
I'm beginning to wonder if your neuronal connections are beginning to ravel.

 

[chrysostom]

Allowing homosexual marriage does nothing to hurt children. Not to mention the fact that homosexual couples also takes care of children and they seem to be capable of doing it well.

how do you know that?

 

[chrysostom]

I take serious umbrage at your question to me.

you should

 

[Silent Hunter]

how do you know that?

:readthis:

. . . once again . . .

. . . are you married?

. . . do you have children?

 

[Selaphiel]

how do you know that?

I have no reason to believe otherwise nor any evidence of the contrary

 

[Silent Hunter]

you should

:troll:

 

[chrysostom]

I have no reason to believe otherwise nor any evidence of the contrary

then you really don't know

 

[Selaphiel]

then you really don't know

So where is your evidence?

 

[bybee]

you should

Well, well, well Chrys, you win. As usual, Your relentless "Johnny-one-note" theme, repeated into infinity, simply bores the rest of us into stupefaction.
You do not, apparently, understand the meaning of "discussion"?
Apparently you have bonded to the "declarative" and accenting the "negative" with no messing with Mr inbetween!
:nono:

 

[chrysostom]

So where is your evidence?

I don't need any

I want things to stay as they are

 

[chrysostom]

Well, well, well Chrys, you win. As usual, :

it doesn't feel like I am winning

 

[Selaphiel]

I don't need any

I want things to stay as they are

Why? If you have no reasons for that and no evidence to back up those reasons, then your wish is nothing simply be ascribed some irrational instinct which no one should take seriously.

 

[chrysostom]

Why? If you have no reasons for that and no evidence to back up those reasons, then your wish is nothing simply be ascribed some irrational instinct which no one should take seriously.

I am not worried about you taking me seriously

my job is to state my views the best I can

 

[Silent Hunter]

Well, well, well Chrys, you win. As usual, Your relentless "Johnny-one-note" theme, repeated into infinity, simply bores the rest of us into stupefaction.
You do not, apparently, understand the meaning of "discussion"?
Apparently you have bonded to the "declarative" and accenting the "negative" with no messing with Mr inbetween!
:nono:

. . . were I the one doing what chrys is doing I would be :banned:.

. . . why is it that "punishment" for disruptive behavior is so . . . unfairly meted out?

 

[Selaphiel]

I am not worried about you taking me seriously

my job is to state my views the best I can

If statements is all you can come up with, then I do not see the point of you participating in a discussion. Discussion presupposes that the parties are willing to give reasons for their view. No thinking person will be convinced by a mere declaration that is not founded in a reasonable argument.

 

[The Barbarian]

Considering it is impossible for like genders to marry, the point is moot.

Would have been, if the government hadn't decided to get involved. So long as it was a sacrament, no problem. When it became a government-approved arrangement, then the trouble started.

Like pretty much anything else religious, when government gets involved, it's a disaster.

 

[Silent Hunter]

I am not worried about you taking me seriously

. . . why is no one . . . surprised?

my job is to state my views the best I can

. . . which have been demonstrated to be . . . :kookoo:.


. . . once again . . .

. . . are you married?

. . . do you have children?

 

[Granite]

This thread should be closed.

 

[Silent Hunter]

Would have been, if the government hadn't decided to get involved. So long as it was a sacrament, no problem. When it became a government-approved arrangement, then the trouble started.

Like pretty much anything else religious, when government gets involved, it's a disaster.

. . . while marriage has a religious component to those who believe that sort of thing . . . marriage is not and should not be limited by it.