toldailytopic: Same-sex marriage: for it, or against it?
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
- Status
maybe I can help you with this
the state has no problem with a brother and sister living together
but
they will not allow them to get married because they might get pregnant
so
the state assumes that a married couple will have children
would you agree with that?
I think it's rather disturbing that you are so obsessed with whether or not married couples are having babies.
I am trying to show that the purpose of marriage is to protect the child
don't you think the child needs protection?
And failing miserably ...
What child? Not all marriages produce children. Many marriages are a child's worst nightmare.
you don't think a child needs protection?
If there is no child, what are you protecting him from? Not existing?
Because I don't answer stupid questions that have nothing whatsoever to do with topic of the thread.
What child?
What child?
Maybe you could answer my earlier question. That would almost look like progress.
I haven't denied that that is an aspect of the laws against incest. But it is only one aspect. And I'm not interested in moving in large, slow, boring circles with you, especially when you aren't willing to actually engage the issues.
Charity
New member
stupid as chrys....off subject..lol
ask little children if its okay....problem is, the children have to be grown into the knowledge an understanding...an by the time they can answer #*! its bloody well to late!..
go's to slow..sowing children into life is way bigger than pushing them to read books of past beliefs an choices...to see what they might agree with....
ask little children if its okay....problem is, the children have to be grown into the knowledge an understanding...an by the time they can answer #*! its bloody well to late!..
go's to slow..sowing children into life is way bigger than pushing them to read books of past beliefs an choices...to see what they might agree with....
Samstarrett
New member
:AMR:
alwight
New member
Some children sadly need protection from their own parents, marriage doesn't seem to have any magical preventative powers or to create better people. :nono:
do you see anything marriage does that might protect the child?
Lev Lafayette
New member
What does this possibly have to do with the topic? How does the introduction of same-sex marriage have anything to do with child protection?
I am trying to show that the purpose of marriage is to protect the child
And you're demonstrably wrong in this assumption. If children become part of the equation then marriage is a more stable platform for them, emotionally. That's a real plus, but not the point outside of your dogma.
:e4e:
alwight
New member
This topic is about whether same sex marriage is acceptable, which to me it is because I don't have the right to prevent specified others from living out their lives in the manner of their choosing, except imo when third parties are harmed.
As I already tried to point out "marriage" itself is rather by the by when it comes to protecting children, which I'm sorry would need to be addressed under some other heading or title.
The state of "marriage" may suggest different things to different people but after all it is only a word, while protecting children can't be dealt with or summed up quite that easily since it could well depend on a whole variety of factors.
- Status