freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
dying god-men..............
dying god-men..............
All the points in my former post and elsewhere holds, puns and all
'God' who is immortal, incorruptible, unchanging, unconditioned in his original essence by space or time but the One in whom all space and time is contained, but is still uncontainable, cannot DIE. - only that which is subject to space or time, mortality can die. The only way you jerry rig that concept in, is in the assumption that the man Jesus is God, who fully experiences mortality and suffers a mortal wound and death in the fullest ultimate sense per one's Christological creed or interpretation of that event (the Incarnation). This is all good and could be variously understood or interpreted/assumed/believed metaphysically or as a statement of religious belief. I give Trinitarian theology props in some ways since one has the full playing-field to synthesize or synergize both human and divine aspects of Jesus, so gets to explore the full depths of this extraordinary marriage in one man in so many ways. But a Unitarian Christology can too, because 'God' is still 'God', and Jesus retains his special and unique Sonship and Messiahood, none the less.
We would note that the earliest creeds do not profess a concept of God dying, and those after the Apostles Creed even seem to avoid speaking of Jesus 'dying' (focusing more on how he is 'God'a), but only 'suffering', then being raised again. Those creeds in the 4th century onwards were engaged in various Christological debates and doctrinal formulations, and even the brightest theologians will not admit to any 'death' experienced by God but only being assumed by the humanity or human soul/constitution of Jesus, and NEVER any element of pure divinity that Jesus might BE or have assumed. In any case, we can debate the fine metaphysics involved here, and universally since God is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent, we can see he does have intimate knowledge or experience of all things and beings, especially those who are his own sons, and much more with his Special and Uniquely begotten Son Jesus. But the pure essence of Deity cannot by nature or definition die, being deathless, incorruptible, timeless. Not to nitpick, but this logical proposition holds. - I'm aware of the wonderful and deep theological explanations on the mystery and beauty of the Incarnation, how Jesus tastes death for every man, but just saying.
As far as your definition of 'death' is concerned, or what it means to 'die',...you'll have to better ask me that question more specifically and in what context. But this may take us down many bunny trails since 'death' can be described or defined in so many ways.
dying god-men..............
To state this is to deny the Christian faith. Simple as that.
My bet is that you don't even understand what it means to die.
All the points in my former post and elsewhere holds, puns and all
'God' who is immortal, incorruptible, unchanging, unconditioned in his original essence by space or time but the One in whom all space and time is contained, but is still uncontainable, cannot DIE. - only that which is subject to space or time, mortality can die. The only way you jerry rig that concept in, is in the assumption that the man Jesus is God, who fully experiences mortality and suffers a mortal wound and death in the fullest ultimate sense per one's Christological creed or interpretation of that event (the Incarnation). This is all good and could be variously understood or interpreted/assumed/believed metaphysically or as a statement of religious belief. I give Trinitarian theology props in some ways since one has the full playing-field to synthesize or synergize both human and divine aspects of Jesus, so gets to explore the full depths of this extraordinary marriage in one man in so many ways. But a Unitarian Christology can too, because 'God' is still 'God', and Jesus retains his special and unique Sonship and Messiahood, none the less.
We would note that the earliest creeds do not profess a concept of God dying, and those after the Apostles Creed even seem to avoid speaking of Jesus 'dying' (focusing more on how he is 'God'a), but only 'suffering', then being raised again. Those creeds in the 4th century onwards were engaged in various Christological debates and doctrinal formulations, and even the brightest theologians will not admit to any 'death' experienced by God but only being assumed by the humanity or human soul/constitution of Jesus, and NEVER any element of pure divinity that Jesus might BE or have assumed. In any case, we can debate the fine metaphysics involved here, and universally since God is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent, we can see he does have intimate knowledge or experience of all things and beings, especially those who are his own sons, and much more with his Special and Uniquely begotten Son Jesus. But the pure essence of Deity cannot by nature or definition die, being deathless, incorruptible, timeless. Not to nitpick, but this logical proposition holds. - I'm aware of the wonderful and deep theological explanations on the mystery and beauty of the Incarnation, how Jesus tastes death for every man, but just saying.
As far as your definition of 'death' is concerned, or what it means to 'die',...you'll have to better ask me that question more specifically and in what context. But this may take us down many bunny trails since 'death' can be described or defined in so many ways.