Jesus died at the hands of the Roman Empire, crucified as a criminal for being a danger to the state. The writing placed upon the cross--although differently written for each gospel--tells us what his offense was.
After he died, men and men only characterized his death as a blood offering for sin, but this idea was actually not totally worked out theologically until around the year 900 by the medieval Christian scholar Anselm of Canterbury.
The quotation in the gospels of "ransom" for payment is the Greek word lutron which referred to the money a friend of a prisoner would have to pay for the prisoner to be freed. It wasn't anything to do with the spilling of blood on an altar. Besides, Jesus forgave, healed and saved many long before he turned his face to Jerusalem for the final time.
++++++++++++++++++++++
It is truly sad that an exclusive focus on Jesus and a moral Christian life is apparently so disruptive and alarming for many on Theologyonline.
The victimization, the anger covering up shame and the immaturity of most folks on this website is truly astonishing to me.
Nevertheless, I will continue to stress the authentic parabolic teachings of Jesus as well as connecting myself and the world to the great moral epic of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament.
I stand secure in my faith and nothing threatens me.
I suggest you read and study Hebrews. It was all worked out their for the Jews and has been since Luke wrote it.
FYI, INRI is an acronym meaning Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum, or "Jesus the Nazarene, the King of the Jews." The actual inscription on the Cross was written in three languages, Latin, Greek and Aramaic. We know from Scripture that what was actually written was "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews".
Jesus was executed by the Romans at the request of the Jewish High Council.