No, you see yourself projected onto an amused surface.
At least that doesn't make any sense. You're making progress.
No, you see yourself projected onto an amused surface.
Stop it. I already feel good enough.At least that doesn't make any sense.
They should put you in the next DSM. oly:They should put TH and BB in a book of antonyms.
What I don't need is some goofy stuffed shirt thinking his prudish world view is holy.You don't need, nor should you desire that kind of attention. -Lon
What I don't need is some goofy stuffed shirt thinking his prudish world view is holy.
Yes. You do.
billybob was a goodhearted, free-wheeling sort, without an ounce of stuffiness or pretention
he was a lot of fun
he was a friend
i miss him too
I didn't hate him, but did report him a couple of times for basal-fleshly posts and concerns incongruent with this forum. It was why he was asked to leave (his behavior, not my or another's reports). Maybe you and Eeset, who only knew him for about a month, can E-mail him or see him on another forum. This one wasn't for him. -Lonthe goofier the better! :banana:
He was rightly banned ...
Now now you don't seem to understand Trump logic. A record is a record.Meanwhile, Polls: Trump approaches 100 days with lowest job approval rating in more than 70 years
So that's got to sting. lain:
We’ve heard a lot from President Trump, in the past week or so, about securing our borders — the southern one from migrant Mexicans, the northern from stealthy Canadian dairy farmers — and about all the taxes he wants to lower. There’s a reason for this. The TV-obsessed president knows that he will be endlessly judged by a report-card-obsessed media for his performance during these first 100 days. And as it happens, trade, taxes and immigration are the notable areas where Trump can claim to have demonstrated some ideological consistency, if not a ton of movement. In most other aspects, the nascent Trump presidency is very much a work in progress, or perhaps a work in regress from the rhetoric of his campaign. The candidate who skewered China as a currency manipulator is now the president who declared that China is not a currency manipulator. The candidate critical of intervention in Syria and of suspicion toward Russia has now launched missiles into Syria and blamed the Russians for it. He no longer thinks that NATO or the Export-Import Bank is unnecessary. He no longer cares whether President Obama’s health care law is entirely or even mostly repealed, as long as he can pass something that doesn’t send the whole system cratering. As I wrote a few weeks ago, this is the actual story of these first 100 days — the story of a showman stunned by his own victory and trying to figure out whom he should listen to and how he wants to govern. Which leads me to what I think are some uncomfortable questions for Trump’s critics, particularly in my own industry. If Trump turns out to be serious about growing into the job, do we have the capacity to let him? Or, as I’ve heard from a lot of angry readers over the past few months, are we already invested in watching him fail? To be clear, whatever presuppositions Trump now faces among most of the reporters who cover him — and among the solid majority of voters who disapprove of his job performance — are of his own making. It’s hard to suddenly start granting the benefit of the doubt to someone who so brazenly lies about things both mundane and consequential. https://www.yahoo.com/news/willing-let-trump-evolve-090022380.html |
Meanwhile, Polls:
Trump approaches 100 days with lowest job approval rating in more than 70 years
So that's got to sting. lain:
Meanwhile, Polls: Trump approaches 100 days with lowest job approval rating in more than 70 years
So that's got to sting. lain:
:think: Gotta wonder: Trump polls 97% approval (today)
I looked at the gallop polls: 86% were Republican. Something doesn't add up and perhaps his claim that there is a lot of 'fake' news published is correct?
trump may have the approval of those who voted for him, but he scores at negative eleventeen gazillion among butthurt hillary supporters
So they missed on the turnout. Okay. How does that invalidate people telling pollsters how they feel about the President's performance again?the same pollsters who predicted a hillary win? :think:
I'm sure that matters to someone, but as a voter who didn't support her, not so much. :nono:i wonder what president hillary's approval ratings are?
oh, wait
never mind :chuckle:
The poll you linked to had a somewhat misleading title with a bit of bias peeking through, didn't it? 93% and "the lion"?:think: Gotta wonder: Trump polls 93% approval (today)
I looked at the gallop polls: 86% were Republican. Something doesn't add up. Perhaps his claim that there is a lot of 'fake' news published is correct?
Well, again, the Gallop poll was (from memory) 87% Republican. There are a few considerations and problems with the Gallop poll.The poll you linked to had a somewhat misleading title with a bit of bias peeking through, didn't it? 93% and "the lion"?
So first, unlike the polling I noted, which encompassed Americans at large (and through 2 different polls) the one you presented was sampling his actual supporters from 2016 and even there the headline is struggling a bit, as only 42% of those strongly approve.
Or, even in the minority that elected him less than half strongly support the job he's doing. 51% "somewhat" approve. Somewhat? What kind of range is that taking in? How little or how much?
So not necessarily a conflict at all.