Not really the case, though SD has a website full of the writings of people she doesn't care for around here and doser keeps me in his signature line and creates whole threads dedicated to my postings, along with the following me about apparently hoping for some error, slight as it might be (the last being my use of pour over instead of pore over, which was inadvertently helpful) so he can smack his pate and lament.we have members who keep track of everything anybody has ever said or done or thought
I wonder if that habit might be the root of his trouble. :think:
Eeset tried to change the fault of her conduct and place it at Sherman's feet. That wasn't fair or honest. The demonstrable fact of the matter is that most of her benchings were given to her by the old guard, not the new. And they weren't misunderstandings, as a plain reading of her own words set out readily enough.
People who attempt to reinvent history rarely enjoy it when a record of the actual is presented, so they almost always attempt to shift the focus, play a shell game of sorts. I don't think it really works out well for them in the end. It hasn't here.