ECT THE ARROGANCE & BLINDNESS OF THE PROTESTANT HERESY

[Catholic Crusader]

I respect you. We disagree here. But I understand you.

Have you read this? > http://www.catholic.com/tracts/apostolic-succession

 

[PneumaPsucheSoma]

The apostles (and their ordained successors, the bishops) taught God's message in Christ's own name and by his very authority---they spoke for God---and their teachings were infallible and binding (Ac. 16:4; 1 Tim. 3:15;1 Jn. 4:6). Therefore, your previous claim that "When any man or men stand in the place and authority of God, bad things will always follow" simply does not follow. Not then with the apostles, and not now with the bishops.

Would you remind me of something, please? I recall you being a Theistic / Teleological Evolutionist? Is that correct?

Thanks in advance.

 

[PneumaPsucheSoma]

The apostles (and their ordained successors, the bishops) taught God's message in Christ's own name and by his very authority---they spoke for God---and their teachings were infallible and binding (Ac. 16:4; 1 Tim. 3:15;1 Jn. 4:6). Therefore, your previous claim that "When any man or men stand in the place and authority of God, bad things will always follow" simply does not follow. Not then with the apostles, and not now with the bishops.

Do you wholly endorse and adhere to everything from Vatican II forward, just as you adhere to all that came before Vatican II?

Do you consider Francis to be infallible in all his rendered statements, declarations, and assertions? Is He presiding as the Christ Vicar for all Christians?

 

[Nameless.In.Grace]

Have you read this? > http://www.catholic.com/tracts/apostolic-succession

I will read it for you CC. [emoji854]


Sent from my iPad using TOL ~Jesus is the Theology and the Counselor is the Commentary

 

[Nameless.In.Grace]

Have you read this? > http://www.catholic.com/tracts/apostolic-succession

I was looking for this!!!! Thank you!!! It shows how scripture was guarded from John the Revelator to Polycarp and on down the line!!!!

Thank you!


Sent from my iPad using TOL ~Jesus is the Theology and the Counselor is the Commentary

 

[Cruciform]

Would you remind me of something, please? I recall you being a Theistic / Teleological Evolutionist? Is that correct?

Not exactly. I affirm biological evolution as a scientific conclusion, and I hold to the Christian doctrine of creation as a theological conviction.

 

[Cruciform]

Do you wholly endorse and adhere to everything from Vatican II forward, just as you adhere to all that came before Vatican II?

Of course.

Do you consider Francis to be infallible in all his rendered statements, declarations, and assertions?

Not at all, nor is that what is taught by the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility.

Is He presiding as the Christ Vicar for all Christians?

He is the Vicar of Christ, yes.

 

[PneumaPsucheSoma]

Not exactly. I affirm biological evolution as a scientific conclusion, and I hold to the Christian doctrine of creation as a theological conviction.

In what way does that differ from what I inquired regarding?

 

[PneumaPsucheSoma]

Of course.

Not at all, nor is that what is taught by the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility.

He is the Vicar of Christ, yes.

Thanks for clarifying.

 

[ZacharyB]

Do you consider Francis to be infallible in all his
rendered statements, declarations, and assertions?
Is He presiding as the Christ Vicar for all Christians?

Art thou kidding me?
He's the worst of them all ... and from the very pits of hell itself.
Watch and see!

 

[beameup]

I live in a country in S.E. Asia that is 85% Catholic, and I could tell you about some of the things going on here, but those of the RCC persuasion online here would call me a liar and demand "references". This "mind-set" is precisely the same as those of Jewish persuasion.

 

[ZacharyB]

I live in a country in S.E. Asia that is 85% Catholic, and I could tell you about some of the things going on here, but those of the RCC persuasion online here would call me a liar and demand "references". This "mind-set" is precisely the same as those of Jewish persuasion.

Please give us a "heads up".

 

[PneumaPsucheSoma]

Art thou kidding me?
He's the worst of them all ... and from the very pits of hell itself.
Watch and see!

I can't even say what I think of Francis on this forum. I don't need to watch to see. I already see.

Black Pope.

 

[Cruciform]

In what way does that differ from what I inquired regarding?

Theistic evolution incorporates divine activity (the supernatural) into its scientific position, whereas my scientific views do not incorporate the supernatural. Therefore, I do not apply the term "theistic evolution" to myself.

 

[beameup]

Please give us a "heads up".

This is the local idol:

 

[Catholic Crusader]

This is the local idol:

Thanks for demonstrating the fact that you have no clue what an idol is.

".....Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc. Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon"......"

An idol is not an object, it is a false god, or something we place above God.

What you have there is an image of the child Jesus. Since Jesus is not "a false god, or something we place above God", then that is not an idol.

Stop being a moron.

 

[beameup]

Thanks for demonstrating the fact that you have no clue what an idol is.

".....Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc. Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon"......"

An idol is not an object, it is a false god, or something we place above God.

What you have there is an image of the child Jesus. Since Jesus is not "a false god, or something we place above God", then that is not an idol.

Stop being a moron.

Yea, the "Three Kings" brought an artist along to create the image (idol). :rotfl:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

This is the local idol:

Who is that supposed to be?

 

[beameup]

Who is that supposed to be?

see post #296
Many homes here have one.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

see post #296
Many homes here have one.

Yes, do they claim this is the child Jesus?