Sure it will.
Drunk (and high) people can still walk in front of self-driving cars...
Ph.D in Pot & the G.H.W. Bush Legacy
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Drunk (and high) people can still walk in front of self-driving cars...
I DID address your argument. You claimed, "But one inhale on a joint of weed is enough to produce a high." And I told you that isn't true, plain and simple. Got any more arguments?
Ah, I see your problem. You are equating drunkenness with a marijuana high. Those two things are nowhere near the same. You are speaking out of ignorance here. Come back after you've had some personal experience or made some personal observations with cannabis and then you'll know what you're talking about.
drbrumley
Well-known member
As Dr. Rogers explained....There are always consequences for your choices. Always. If you choose to step off the roof of a ten-story building, you are not then free to choose the consequence of your choice. Your choice has chosen for you.
And I responded that anecdotal evidence is not sufficient.
Perhaps you had some weed that doesn't give a high.
It does exist..
Not with just one puff from a joint.
Uh, no, I did not specify what drug the high is caused by.
I don't need to.
I have plenty of studies and research papers that show that pot is dangerous to those who use it as a recreational drug.
Being drunk and being high are BOTH being intoxicated.
Both make one a liability to oneself and to those around him.
Which is why BOTH should be illegal.
There is such a thing as pot that doesn't produce a high. It's possible you had one of those joints.
Which, again, is why anecdotal evidence is not sufficient for an argument.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
it was for some poeple, back in the day when thc levels were much lower than they are now
and for others, a whole joint had no effect
in general, the more marijuana exposure, the lower your reaction times, the greater the diminishment of judgement and the greater frequency and magnitude of poor choices
Nope. I've had stuff from Oregon and Colorado with up to 25%+ THC. And just one puff isn't going to get you "high." Now if you're talking about joints that have been infused with concentrates, that is another matter. But I haven't messed with that stuff.
A tricky thing about illegal weed is you never know what it might be laced with. This was especially true back in the day.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Yeah, too many idiot lawyers which is why it's hard to count on the law.
glorydaz
Well-known member
The remedy, of course, is to grow it yourself or trust your source.
glorydaz
Well-known member
I wonder how we would do that, and what "drugs" are we talking about having a war against?
It's looking like big Pharma is responsible for a whole lot of deaths.
drbrumley
Well-known member
[MENTION=16942]JudgeRightly[/MENTION], maybe you can answer this question
Totally!
Anything that the normal use of produces an immediate high should be made a strictly controlled substance, if not outright illegal (depending on what it is).
Recreational use should not be allowed.
drbrumley
Well-known member
Is this a preference they be illegal or is there biblical warrant?
Still doesn't change the fact that you're trying to make your argument on anecdotal evidence.
Which just doesn't fly here.
drbrumley
Well-known member
Right now it isn't....you catch someone breaking this so called law, and your the judge, what do you do?