Here is where it started:
This is an odd question for one who understands Christ as God. I was questioned first on it by a 1Mind, who is a Unitarian so it was an odd thing to be questioned by a person who claims to be triune. PPS's next comment supported a Unitarian, against a triune doctrine.
Nope. Not even close.
The Eastern Orthodox do confuse the Spirit as only proceeding from the Father, but it is not 'sexual' in error.
That had nothing to do with my analogy, which was about Arsenios mistaking Hypostatic Union with perichoresis. Procession is quite another issue altogether from hypostatic union or perichoresis. You weren't bothering to pay attention, preferring to become incensed over your own ignorant false perception and assessment.
That is a gross overstatement. Do they essentially disagree with the Triune position? No. They may misunderstand it, but embrace God as One with three distinctions.
Total sidebar from my points.
PPS is less gracious to erring Trinitarians than I or others.
Finally an accurate statement from you. Trinitarians have no business correcting others when they don't even represent their own doctrine.
There is a precedence for calling those who have an appearance of godliness yet denying the power thereof, but it must be done accurately. Sexuality has no place in a triune discussion about our God.
The problem with this comment is two-fold. First, I had already desisted and posted an apology to anyone offended. Second, it was to illustrate the simple blasphemous fallacy of equating hypostatic union (which includes physical sexual union for a human husband and wife) to the perichoresis of the alleged multiple hypostases.
You simply didn't and don't understand, instead choosing to play preschool tattletale in your tantrum of utter confusion. Odd how Nang clearly understood my criticism by using sexual terms related to a human husband and wife in hypostatic union (which was HIS example to begin with, and to which I responded).
This thread isn't for that purpose. Furthermore, when corrected on this, his understanding of 'simplicity' and the nature of the physical universe as coming from God who is Spirit,
Which is what you grossly misunderstood.
he showed himself to be arrogant, not beneath sophomoric ridicule, nor above exacerbating that ridicule by 'reporting' his indiscretion in order to malign and marginalize, he showed himself to be a candidate for infraction, even gaining maliciousness against challenge.
My responses were to your unimaginable, and still remaining, misrepresentation and peculiar inversion of literally every word I said. And there was no reasonig with you. Ask Nang. She understood what I was saying.
I simply reported his gross indiscretion for calling a fellow Trinitarian, however heterodox, a homosexual, wrong and inappropriate for TOL.
I didn't call anyone a homosexual. I was depicting his misunderstanding of perichoresis as hypostatic union by demonstrating that a Father and Son in hypostatic union would be illustrative of marriage. That's blasphemous, though I insisted it was unintentional as ignorance.
It doesn't belong in this thread. I said nothing of these indiscretions, harmful words, or self-elevating other-effacing expressions.
You're hyper-sensitive and anxious to misrepresent. I'll say it again... You have completely misunderstood, misrepresented, misapprehended, and mispreceived virtually every word I've said, and to a degree I've never experienced since I first drew breath as a human.
You missed it that bad. Spirit from flesh? No. Nor all the other stuff you claimed as my position.
His infraction was 'not' for a spiritual argument, but an incorrect crude comment about another's theology that had nothing to do with sexuality, nor especially perverted sexuality with the living God.
If only you had any idea what I said and why, you would have agreed instead of playing kindergarten with the report button.
You have misunderstood everything I've said about Theology Proper. And you've misunderstood my comments about the blasphemous conflation of perichoresis and hypostatic union for Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
And this doesn't even address your temper and immature recourse over your own false perceptions that you didn't bother to clarify and ignored my own attempts at clarification.
If you ever figure out what I said, let me know. Your false accusations are unfounded, as was my infraction at your hands.
atrol:
