badp
New member
You need to stop letting a bunch of God-hating liberals redefine your vocabulary.
On Deservedness
- Thread starter ok doser
- Start date
- Status
You need to stop letting a bunch of God-hating liberals redefine your vocabulary.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
you prolly missed this, but i'm a student on a liberal campus that's in the midst of a rape awareness campaign
i'm also taking a couple of classes that cover rape and women's issues and the feminist perspective
ClimateSanity
New member
How is it they have not permanently banned you from campus?
So you have rape on the brain. You are living and breathing rape everyday. Maybe you can get extra credit for your threads ?
ClimateSanity
New member
He has to discuss it here. If he tells what he really thinks on campus, he will have hell to pay. Diversity on college means skin color and ethnicity. There is zero tolerance for diversity of opinion when it comes to their sacred cows.
I think you are combining things that shouldn't be combined. Stripping is wrong but it has nothing to do with the rape. And before you say it, I realize that you could draw a connection because the stripping may turn the guy on, the guy might not have noticed the girl at all if it weren't for the stripping, the stripping may be why the guys thinks the girl might be game for some activity. So that connection exists. But that means nothing for the actual rape. The second the girl says "NO" and the guy continues then it's on him. Any prior behavior is irrelevant. If you want to condemn the girl for stripping, fine, but any moral fault she has in that matters not for the guy who raped her.
I don't think it's contradictory. In your first scenario there was only one candidate for fault if you are going to assign any: The victim who got out of his car. Once you change the scenario to include a being capable of moral decisions then it completely changes. The person is still foolish for getting out of the car and they would still be at fault for that if you want to assign fault, but there's no diminishing the fault on the lion for the attack. If punishment is doled out then it's not a percentage of the full punishment because the person got out of the car. Still full punishment. No one makes the moral lion attack. No one makes a guy rape.
And I thought I answered all your questions. If you can point me to what I didn't answer then I can look at it.
Response above.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Well, it isn't that I want to condemn her, although that's certainly been the charge that's being made. :chuckle:
I'm talking about people being accountable for their bad behavior. There are NO INNOCENT victims in the above scenario. Most rape victims are innocent....but not all are innocent. Pretty simple.
And I agree with what you've written. I've never once said two wrong doers share the guilt. The man is totally guilty for raping the stripper. The stripper is totally guilty for her immoral behavior....which you lined out quite well above, by the way.
There is plenty of guilt to go around.....they don't need to share it. Her bad behavior could have dire consequences just as his could (and should). Her consequences COULD be even worse than rape if the rapist decides he doesn't want to leave any witnesses to cry rape. He could strangle her and dismember her and stick her in a dumpster. Do I WANT that to happen? Of course not. Only the ignorant liberal loons would make that claim. They thrive on feeding their over active imaginations..... :sigh:
Well that would be something they would do. Feminists love phrases like 'kill yourself' or 'go far away' when you don't agree with them, so no doubt it wouldn't be surprising if, given the authority, they would ban someone.
Have 'rape awareness' is basically just an excuse for women to be adored and worshiped for a little while.
Everyone is aware of rape.
Anyway, 'deserving' something and 'reaping what one sows' aren't necessarily synonymous.
The 'what goes around, comes around' form, for example, is where one is deserving what they get. But having been raped from being promiscuous and careless- that is simply reaping what one sowed. Blame the transgressor, but blame yourself as well in that sort of circumstance.
That's whats ridiculous with this entire debate- there is no factoring of accountability period on the other end. That's just being childish.
That is to be expected on a thread that is specifically labeling rape with a title of "On Deservedness".
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
:freak:
(takes a peek at the OP)
nope - not a single mention of rape
you must be thinking of some other thread :idunno:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Your own links in your OP alluded to or specified rape or did you somehow forget?
You're really none too bright SOD...
:dunce:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
rusha makes a bizarre claim:
dozer responds:
artie stumbles in drunk and manages to peck out:
sorry artie, i still don't see what rusha claimed, a thread that is specifically labeling rape with a title of "On Deservedness"
maybe when you sober up you can point it out to me :idunno:
dozer responds:
artie stumbles in drunk and manages to peck out:
sorry artie, i still don't see what rusha claimed, a thread that is specifically labeling rape with a title of "On Deservedness"
maybe when you sober up you can point it out to me :idunno:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
were they dropped out of airplanes to test them for morality first?
got just a wee bit of this on the cbc before i left this morning
not sure i want to google it
And the dozer picks his teeth with his toes as he contemplates how best to demean those who disagree with him....
Of course he means no harm....
He means annihilation!
I would advise you there are more wholesome things to view?
musterion
Well-known member
I dont watch porn. I said it is a news report that raises questions.
- Status