ECT MAD implies both Jesus and Paul are liars.

[Right Divider]

Haaaa Paul calls it his gospel because he believed in it and taught it.

I can call it my gospel too. lol

Haaaa.... that's the best you can do?

:mock: Covenant of Grace.

You said that you never said it, I showed you where you did. You -> silent :loser:

 

[musterion]

"Covenant of grace."

You know, it's not just the Reformed. Catholics are also big believers in the CoG.

GT is probably Catholic. It would explain everything.

 

[God's Truth]

Haaaa.... that's the best you can do?

:mock: Covenant of Grace.

You said that you never said it, I showed you where you did. You -> silent :loser:

Your imagination has taken over you.

 

[God's Truth]

"Covenant of grace."

You know, it's not just the Reformed. Catholics are also big believers in the CoG.

GT is probably Catholic. It would explain everything.

I only speak what the Bible says.

You sound like those who mocked Jesus while he was walking to his death.

 

[God's Truth]

Mark 15:19 They kept striking His head with a staff and spitting on Him. And they knelt down and bowed before Him. 20 And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him out to crucify him.

Matthew 26:67 Then they spat in His face and struck Him. Others slapped Him, 68and said, “Prophesy to us, Christ! Who hit You?”

There is a spirit in people who would do such a thing.

 

[musterion]

I only speak what the Bible says.

You sound like those who mocked Jesus while he was walking to his death.

Your priest can't repent for you.

 

[God's Truth]

Your priest can't repent for you.

What does that even mean? My Priest is Jesus Christ.

 

[Right Divider]

Your imagination has taken over you.

That is all that you can say when:

• You claim that you didn't say something.
• I should you the exact post where you did say it.

You are dishonest to say that least.

 

[God's Truth]

That is all that you can say when:

• You claim that you didn't say something.
• I should you the exact post where you did say it.

You are dishonest to say that least.

Show where I called it a covenant of grace.

 

[Right Divider]

Show where I called it a covenant of grace.

Don't you even read the posts that you REPLY to?

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ul-are-liars&p=5047439&viewfull=1#post5047439

 

[God's Truth]

Don't you even read the posts that you REPLY to?

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ul-are-liars&p=5047439&viewfull=1#post5047439

You know you can't show where I said it. Couldn't you of just said you were wrong?

 

[Right Divider]

You know you can't show where I said it. Couldn't you of just said you were wrong?

I QUOTED the EXACT post where you said it, liar.

Can't you read?

 

[JudgeRightly]

Don't you even read the posts that you REPLY to?

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ul-are-liars&p=5047439&viewfull=1#post5047439

She very clearly does not read what people write. She referenced John 1:3 and then quoted a verse from somewhere else in the Bible to make her point.

I pointed out the incorrect reference and she denies it. I point it out again and she gets defensive, telling me to reply to the point she made, even though I'm trying to help her out.

Here are the quotes:

...

It no longer means anything to be blood related to Abraham.

John 1:3 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

Read what is plainly written and believe it.

Children born NOT of natural descent, i.e. blood relations to Abraham.

...

...

I think you quoted the wrong verse. Please correct it, then make the point again.

...

...

I did not quote the wrong scripture.

...

...

You referenced John 1:3, and then proceeded to talking about children not of blood, or whatever. Here is John 1:3:

All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. - John 1:3 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John1:3&version=NKJV

Does that look like the verse you were trying to reference?

I think I know which one you meant to reference, but I want to give you the opportunity to correct yourself.

...

Talk about the scripture I gave and stop concentrating on things that don't matter.

GT, I believe the verse you were trying to quote was 1 John 3:1, is that correct? If so, why did you not just admit it, correct it, and move on, instead of denying it multiple times?

 

[Right Divider]

She very clearly does not read what people write.

Apparently she doesn't even read what she writes.

GT, I believe the verse you were trying to quote was 1 John 3:1, is that correct? If so, why did you not just admit it, correct it, and move on, instead of denying it multiple times?

She is very dishonest and it appears more and more like it is deliberate.

 

[God's Truth]

Apparently she doesn't even read what she writes.


She is very dishonest and it appears more and more like it is deliberate.

hahaha Your argument should be with Judgerightly, he is the one who called it a covenant of grace.

 

[Right Divider]

hahaha Your argument should be with Judgerightly, he is the one who called it a covenant of grace.

My apologies then. It appeared that you were calling it that in your post #516

 

[God's Truth]

I QUOTED the EXACT post where you said it, liar.

Can't you read?

Quote me saying it is a covenant of grace. Go ahead and prove it.

 

[God's Truth]

She very clearly does not read what people write. She referenced John 1:3 and then quoted a verse from somewhere else in the Bible to make her point.

I pointed out the incorrect reference and she denies it. I point it out again and she gets defensive, telling me to reply to the point she made, even though I'm trying to help her out.

Here are the quotes:











GT, I believe the verse you were trying to quote was 1 John 3:1, is that correct? If so, why did you not just admit it, correct it, and move on, instead of denying it multiple times?

I posted exactly what I was talking about. You prove you are nothing but contentious and steeped in falseness, imho.

 

[God's Truth]

My apologies then. It appeared that you were calling it that in your post #516

Did you hear that, JudgeRightly? Right Divider apologized. That could be a good sign.

 

[Right Divider]

Quote me saying it is a covenant of grace. Go ahead and prove it.

I already explained that it appeared that you were saying that and if not, I apologize.

It does seem consistent with your total confusion about the new covenant between God and Israel.

God never made a covenant with gentiles, ever.

The gospel of the grace of God, which Paul preached, does not need any covenant. God can dispense His grace ANY way that He sees fit.

Currently He is offering His grace FREELY and you won't take it.

You claim it's all about Christ until you have to show off your "obedience". The obedience of ONE is the only way to get saved and once again, you will not accept it.