I can't help it. I, inherited it /learned it. I'll have you know I come from a long line of folks who "Flattered themselves something fierce."
ECT Mad finds itself in the trash by applying simple logic
- Thread starter andyc
- Start date
I can't help it. I, inherited it /learned it. I'll have you know I come from a long line of folks who "Flattered themselves something fierce."
WonderfulLordJesus
New member
Yes, to go one further, there really was no atoning animal sacrifice for sin, or the Lord Jesus would not have had to offer Himself for sin. I don't have the time now, but there are verses in the Old Testament that are almost amusing, where the Lord tells Israel He's sick of their sacrifices and the stink of the smoke rising, as I recall a few thousand years on or whatever, and the Lord is still trying to get it across to them the controversy is not over hacking up and burning animals, rather the righteousness of man, or the incessant lack thereof. Clear also in New Testament scripture that the righteous Jews of old were only justified by faith, by trust in the Lord and, as if, looking forward to Christ's perfect redemption, that God, Himself, would provide that Lamb, as He did the shadow of the Lord Jesus to come, for Abraham in Genesis 22.
Boasting in your flesh is something which will keep you out of Christ's Kingdom.
Php 3:2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.
Php 3:3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.
Php 3:4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:
Php 3:5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
Php 3:6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
Php 3:7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.
Php 3:8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
LA
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
:chuckle:
Hi and you have hit one thing for sure , THAT God was SICK of there so-called SWEET SMELLING and thEIR SACRIFICES and that God is rejecting Water Baptism , Signs and Tongues so called , because Pentecost has been set aside and MANY verse like Luke 13:6-9 explain , which is just ONE and Isa 6 and why they are all ACCURSED as Gal 1:8 says and Gal 5:4 FALLEN from GRACE back to keeping the Law , with Baptism , Tongues and SIGNS !!
dan p
dan p
:chuckle:
Only the ignorant ones. :chuckle:
Right Divider
Body part
Right Divider
Body part
Prov 11:2 (AKJV/PCE)
(11:2) [When] pride cometh, then cometh shame: but with the lowly [is] wisdom.
Prov 16:18 (AKJV/PCE)
(16:18) Pride [goeth] before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
Prov 29:23 (AKJV/PCE)
(29:23) A man's pride shall bring him low: but honour shall uphold the humble in spirit.
Enjoy it while it lasts.
Then how did He know she was guilty?
Ignorance is no excuse. They were breaking the Law. And it makes sense that they may very well be what Jesus pointed out to them with what He wrote in the sand.
- They broke the letter of the Law. I'm not surprised you don't know, even in spite of the fact I posted the specific laws they were breaking in one of these threads, as have some others.
- Show me one verse that speaks of the "spirit of the Law."
All have sinned. And John wrote that to be guilty of breaking one law is to be guilty of breaking the whole Law.
It was never meant to bring life.:nono: The only things in the Bible meant to bring life were the Tree of Life and Jesus.
Has any MAD ever claimed otherwise?
Coward.
It's not demonism; but it is delusion.
Seeing as he agrees with the owner of this site on many points that's not going to happen.
musterion
Well-known member
FWIW, look up the accounts of why the cops were called to Asuza Street and what eyewitnesses (some of them participants) saw. Delusion is true but does not explain it all.
dodge
New member
Hey GM ,I see about as much Christ in you and your responses as I see reading about Judas Iscariot.
I'm not watching a video of that length.:nono:
I have other things to do.
I spent ten years in an A/G church; I know what goes on. It's mass: hysteria, delusion and deception. All of of it driven by emotional hype.
musterion
Well-known member
Didn't ask you to watch the whole thing. That's why I gave to the time increments.
Okay.
And demons.
Yep - emotional hype viewed through a superstitious mind.
In reality, such moments are no different than the self-delusion we all at one point or another sometimes find we have brought on ourselves...when looking for a passage in a wrong chapter during a brief self-delusion that "it is in this chapter - I swear it is!" :chuckle:
Absent of an understanding of the inner workings of said self-induced mind games - the superstitious - on both sides of the fence - go all "supernatural" as to an explanation as to its' source - both get all "I swear it is...Pigs In The Parlor!!!"
:chuckle:
OK, I'll think about it.:chuckle:
andyc
New member
:chuckle:
Telling her to leave her life of sin, was a bit of a giveaway.
No they didn't. You sure love to ad lib, don't yo?
You, like your theology is showing it's desperation.
Not mentioned in the text.
I can't see where they broke the letter of the law. And there is nothing mentioned to support your theory. Jesus said nothing about the accusers breaking the law. You're making it up as usual.
As for the spirit of the law, it is simply how the law affects the inner man. I could have worded it differently, but I thought you would understand. How wrong I was. The act of sin condemns the man, but the desire to want to commit the act condemns the conscience of the man. I even used Paul's own understanding of what it means to wrestle under condemnation, even if the act is not carried out. Mind you, talking to you is like talking to a fence post.
Irrelevant response to what I said.
This is what Jesus came to expose. The pharisees who thought they were pure because they observed the letter of the law, wouldn't acknowledge the evil desires within, which is why Jesus called them whitewashed sepulchers.
Those who knew they were condemned by the law, found forgiveness, but those who were proud of there legalistic performance, their sin remained.
Idiot.
I told him to make a thread relevant to whatever he said, and I'd respond to it.
No one has been able to prove cessationism from scripture.