Well, I replied to your point quite directly.
Evidently, you believe that God's creation in Genesis 1:1 was a mess because God's work in Genesis 1:1 was a confusion and darkness.
God is not the author of confusion, and God is light. He did not create a world of confusion and darkness.
It became that way and not because of anything God did, but because of the rebellion of Lucifer and one third of the angels.
I don't understand why you say that. My point was the opposite: that whatever the condition after Gen 1:1, it wasn't complete, just like after day 1 it was incomplete, and after day 2 it was incomplete, and after day 3.... Saying it was a
wrecked creation, just because it isn't in the final state on Day 1 is reading into the text, but you could do it at any of those places--if you ascribe to the catastrophe between vs1 and vs2--because God had not "fixed" the destruction's impact on, say, the sun prior to day 3, or on the animals prior to day 6. What, then, is special about the dichotomy between the first and second verses?
If you believe there was a great cataclysm between Gen 1:1 and 1:2, because of the condition in 1:2 you do so in spite of the scriptures, not in adherence to them. God is not the author of anything less than perfection! So the imperfection of Days 1-5 and early on 6 would be antithetical to God's nature, no matter what happened between :1 and :2. Unless you allow for God to work toward a goal rather than achieving any goal instantaneously.
This is not to say that God cannot achieve things instantaneously, but He can also achieve things in an orderly and progressive fashion.
Now, I'm not averse to considering options on the timing, even possibly a long time frame between the time the world was created until light was created (or even appeared at the earth's surface). And if other stuff was happening (apparently without light on the earth) for millions or billions of years, I could see how one could fit that into the second verse's "evening" which came before "morning". But the only thing that was "formless and void", or "confusion and darkness" as you say, was "the earth". Thus, the rest of the universe was not affected, or if it was, you can't get it from scripture.
But in Ex 20:11 speaks against this:
[Exo 20:11 YLT] 11 for six days hath Jehovah made
the heavens and the earth, the sea, and
all that [is] in them, and resteth in the seventh day; therefore hath Jehovah blessed the Sabbath-day, and doth sanctify it.
Notice that "the heavens" is plural, so it isn't just the atmosphere of the earth--it must apply to at least our sun, moon, and planets, and probably to the whole universe.
Notice that "all that is in them" applies equally to "the heavens", "the earth", and "the sea". So if there are dinosaur bones that were not from creatures God made those 6 days, then God must have made those bones and placed them in those locations during those six days--the "all that is in" "the earth" would have to apply to the fossils. But that is ridiculous--those bones and those fragments of skin, and even those fragments of blood containing real blood cells that have been found in/with dinosaur bones in recent years were from real creatures that laid real eggs that hatched into real creatures that must have been made or descended from those made during those 6 days.
