Originally posted by BillyBob
No, but you did not mention morality, you mentioned Jesus.
I asked Frankie,
not you, what Jesus would think about "Might Makes Right."
I asked
you about morality and international relations.
So, you agree that morality is not restricted to interpersonal relations, but also applies to international relations.
If it is wrong for a strong person to dominate a weak person, then isn't it also wrong for strong nations to dominate weak nations?
So tell me, Mr. Biblical scholar, what was Jesus' foreign policy?
Jesus does not explicitly talk about international relationships. Jesus did not do much traveling outside his own region or culture. He may have talked more about it, if he had traveled widely. However, if morality can be extended to the international realm, then
doesn't it make sense that Jesus would have wanted nations to interact in moral ways?
I suspect that the following passages could apply to both persons and nations:
Matthew 5:9
Matthew 5:44
Matthew 7:12
Matthew 22:39
Matthew 26:52
Luke 14:13
Luke 18:22
I brought up Jesus in response to what Frankie said:
"Might Makes Right = Survival of the Fittest."
I responded by saying:
"Would Jesus agree with 'Might Makes Right'?"
Then you said:
"Jesus wasn't the President of the US, he taught people how to intearct with one another, not how governments should interact."
Doesn't this imply that Jesus would not have cared about the morality of interactions between nations? I think he probably cared, even though that was not his focus.
While we're talking about the Bible, BillyBob, do you think your reaction to Bush's invasion of Iraq is in line with this passage?: Proverbs 24:17-18
What did he have to say about sovereign nations defending themselves against terrorists?
I don't know. But I suspect he might have been opposed to invading nations that are not a threat, and unnecessarily killing tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children. Don't you think, BillyBob?