ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
So when racists use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry it's wrong and a "lie"
you don't agree?
So when racists use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry it's wrong and a "lie"
Of course not. It was a lame justification cobbled by people deeply invested in a moral ill.I never bought the 'mark of Cain' lie,
You mean you don't believe they should have the right. Because the question of law is decided.but queers don't have the right to marry, IMHO;
Depends on what you mean by recognize. You don't have to agree with it or celebrate it, but you can't negate it's existence at law. I'm not sure how its legality actually intersects or would intersect with you beyond the idea of it.neither does the government have the right to force me to recognize their un-holy union
It isn't fashioned to do that. It's not attempting to legislate anyone's morality.Making something legal according to the law of the land doesn't make it line up with The Law of God.
Because we recognize that queer behavior is sin doesn't make us homo-phobes. Just truthful. We cannot be made ashamed of that which has made us acceptable to God, even though we were once lost and 'without excuse,' as you currently are.... when homophones use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry they are martyrs and heros
You mean you don't believe they should have the right.
Actually: it has legislated immorality, which is the basis of our objection. We cannot be forced to accept immorality or we are partakers of it. See the Scripture text in my previous post.It isn't fashioned to do that. It's not attempting to legislate anyone's morality.
So when racists use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry it's wrong and a "lie"
But when homophones use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry they are martyrs and heros
So when racists use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry it's wrong and a "lie"
But when homophones use the bible to justify their hate and bigotry they are martyrs and heros
The law isn't religious law and it isn't telling a blessed soul how to feel or what to believe. It's only telling you what you can't do with that belief in relation to people who differ.Actually: it has legislated immorality, which is the basis of our objection.
That's another broad stroke. Partake? Depends on what you mean by it. A person determined to be offended and find ground could say taxes force you to partake in every immoral action our government takes.We cannot be forced to accept immorality or we are partakers of it.
I never bought the 'mark of Cain' lie, but queers don't have the right to marry, IMHO; neither does the government have the right to force me to recognize their un-holy union. Making something legal according to the law of the land doesn't make it line up with The Law of God.
acceptance?
would you encourage love and acceptance of pedophiles? murderers?
I never bought the 'mark of Cain' lie, but queers don't have the right to marry, IMHO; neither does the government have the right to force me to recognize their un-holy union. Making something legal according to the law of the land doesn't make it line up with The Law of God.
Government recognition has NEVER sanctified marriage.
You appear to NOT be able to separate sins from sinners. Good thing Jesus was able to accept you before you became perfect. Rom 5:8 (NIV)
repentant sinners who recognize their actions as sin are one thing
homos asking society to accept their perversion as normal is something else entirely
They aren't asking, they HAVE the right to get married.
Why not Stan? Who says that a man and a woman have to be a follower of Christ (and have a church wedding) in order to legitimize matrimony?
I'm afraid, on the contrary, that it will backfire. I just don't think she's the best example for this kind of thing......
Why isnt she, were you a sinner before you were saved?
according to five perverted scumbags on the scotus, yes
according to God?
they have the right to be executed
I'm gonna go with God on this one - you have fun going with the five perverted scumbags
according to five perverted scumbags on the scotus, yes
according to God?
they have the right to be executed
I'm gonna go with God on this one
Not even the orthodox Jews agree with you.
Don't we all deserve death?