Exo 20:11
For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
Do you think God hallowed/sanctified just the original Saturday, or all Saturdays?
Sanctify and hallow mean to set aside for holy use. Do you sanctify Saturday? Or do you just like to quote scripture?
Backpedaling now, eh? Iouae, what did God "create" on day 7?
My bad. You found some dodgy website video on the internet, so that must be true.
Dodgy? These videos are far from "dodgy." Did you even bother to watch them? No? They present evidence (and not just scripture) against your entire position, and they do so in a clear and concise manner.
Go on, watch the videos. I'll wait.
The whole body of science knows about old light and the geologic column which shows successive biomes complete with their own food chains, and most biomes did not have overlapping organisms. That's a fact.
Saying it doesn't make it so.
There was an age of the dinosaurs/ followed by an age of the mammals with very little overlap. Your theology needs to be able to explain this, or it is not based in fact.
See the video "The Global Flood and the Hydroplate Theory" above. It explains the geologic column quite well, as well as asteroids, meteors, meteorites, (frozen) water on Mars, earth's radioactivity, the craters on the moon, and much, much more.
6days - there are many christian families homeschooling their children to be just like you - contemptuous of science and facts. It does not bode well.
Christian families (heck, just families in general) who homeschool their children have smarter kids than those who go to government run public schools, and that's including science in the curriculum.
Here you are right Lon. Death entered the human condition when one woman, Eve sinned.
Except that's not what the Bible says.
It says "one man."
The fact that you insist that it was Eve and not Adam shows your knowledge (or rather, lack thereof) of the Bible.
This verse speaks nothing about death being present in food chains since the pre-Cambrian.
"Pre-Cambrian" is a term used by secular scientists who reject the flood of Noah as being an actual event.
But since the Flood did in fact happen, all those terms are moot.
And until the Holocene, there were no humans around to sin - but in all the previous fossil layers before the Holocene we find fossils with other animals in their mouths and stomachs - showing its a FACT that there was plenty of death and dying of animals before the appearance of man on earth.
Sounds like you're still "spinning" God's word to try to make it fit pseudoscientific opinion from people who reject God.
The fossil record of animals found in other fossil animals mouths and stomachs shows 6days IS wrong, and that you are wrong too in playing the "we just don't know" card. We do know. The fossil record is brutal and bloody. T. rex was eating Triceratops long before Adam planted a footprint on planet earth.
We know (read as "it is a fact") that the "geologic column," what you call the "fossil record" does not show millions of years, but is the result of a global flood.
Bible-fact - sin entered the world through one woman - she knowingly disobeyed God after quoting to the snake that they were not to eat the fruit.
No.
Trying to change what the Bible says to fit your beliefs doesn't work. The Bible says sin entered through Adam, not Eve.
Are you claiming that a) the woman never sinned b) the woman never sinned first c) women don't count
D) Eve sinned first, but it's through man that sin entered the world. Consider why Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, and not by Joseph sleeping with her. If sin was passed down through the woman, then yes, you could say that sin entered into the world through a woman. But that's not what Paul says. Paul says that sin entered through one man, because the sin nature is passed down by man, not woman. If it was through woman, then there would have been no hope for humanity, because even Jesus was born of a woman. But since sin entered through man, and not woman, God was able to complete one of Mary's eggs, so that Jesus could be born without the sin nature of His earthly father, Joseph, and yet still be human.
Because Adam sinned, the entire human race was affected. If Adam had not sinned, then it would have been possible for Eve to bear children who would not sin, even though she herself had sinned.
Again, as others have said, by denying the literal reading of Genesis, you remove the entire reason and meaning of Christ coming to Earth to die on the cross.
Do yourself a favour and study the geologic column for a while.
Do yourself a favor, and read the Bible and watch the "Global Flood and the Hydroplate Theory" video I linked above. You just might learn something.
The geologic column has nothing to do with evolution, but everything to do with successive creative events on the part of a Creator over time.
The geologic column has nothing to do with either of those things. Sedimentary layers an average of 1 mile deep around the globe can't be formed by millions of years, only by a catastrophic global flood.
The creation of Adam 6000 years ago was not God's first rodeo.
So you're saying God messed up the first time?
Heretic.
God didn't mess up the first time, and he didn't create over a period of millions of years.
He created in 6 days, and rested on the seventh, about 7 thousand years ago.
