Actually, it is based on a rather lengthy study of Scripture which has long ago backed up a rather cursory glance at same Scripture.You base your claim on the false idea that when people die they are really conscious and fully alive, also on when people are raised from their death, where they really are not dead , to the last judgment and then cast into the lake of fire which is the second death, that they are not really dead but they are still alive.
Because they know how to read and understand English. :duh:Why would any sane person believe anything you say at all?
Sabbatarianism is legalism out of step with NT progressive revelation, inspired Pauline truth.
I absolutely defend trinitarianism on many sites against Arianism, polytheism, Sabellianism (modalism, Oneness, monarchianism, etc.).
You are an idiot that likes straw men ad hominem attacks because you cannot think.:argue: I am a Christian who worships the triune God, but rejects some of your ideas gleaned from your favorite Calvinistic authors.
Inspired Pauline truth? Are you referring to the many NT references where Paul promoted Sunday observance?
Is it true that Paul advocated Sunday observance in all of his letters?
Help me find those verses. I am especially looking for the verse where Paul explained that Jesus was not really the Lord of the Sabbath, that it was all just a misunderstanding.
Yeah, that's the one I'm looking for.
Inspired Pauline truth? Are you referring to the many NT references where Paul promoted Sunday observance?
Is it true that Paul advocated Sunday observance in all of his letters?
Help me find those verses. I am especially looking for the verse where Paul explained that Jesus was not really the Lord of the Sabbath, that it was all just a misunderstanding.
Yeah, that's the one I'm looking for.
You are a modalist aren't you?
What does the sabbath have to do with the OP? There are many other threads to discuss the observance of the Sabbath...
Sent from my SPH-L300 using TheologyOnline mobile app
:chz4brnz:[Had Adam not sinned, could or would Jesus have sinned? Ge 1:31, Ps 51:5]
:yawn: Ad hominem"...You are an idiot..."
You are an antichrist (1 Jn 4:2-6). :reals:"I am a Christian who worships the triune God..."
:yawn: I reject Calvinism (Eph 4:14)."...ut rejects some of your ideas gleaned from your favorite Calvinistic authors."
Jesus was the unique, eternal Son of God, equal with the Father in every sense. The Son shares the eternal nature of the Father, co-equal, co-eternal, co-essential. He was the child of Mary and Joseph in His humanity. He is the Son who is given (Deity) and the child who is born (humanity) Is. 9:6 He is not called a child of God like we are. We are also not called the eternal Son of God because we are not.
We are children of God by regeneration, adoption, not unique, not eternal, not God.
What percentage of deity was Jesus?[You a modalist (1 Jn 4:2-6). :reals:] "I affirm the triune God, Deity and resurrection of Christ, virgin conception, humanity of Christ, etc."
"...[J]ust like you..."
:yawn: Ad hominem"...You are an idiot."
What part of "I" of Jesus was saying His Father was greater than Himself.(also singular)
Joh 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
LA
This relates to position during incarnation/humiliation, not essential equality of nature before, during, after incarnation. Your view leads to contradiction with other verses.
Your view speaks of another jesus who was never human at all, having no nature of man whatever, no human spirit from Adam.
LA
:yawn: Ad hominem"Serpent is clueless and lacks credibility and integrity."
What do you mean by God when you say God-man? Do you mean Jehovah God? Isa 10:21. Is Jesus co-equal and co-eternal with God, the Father?"...I am trinitarian..."
:yawn: You're projecting again. :noway: Eph 4:14[To God's Truth] "I am a monotheist, not a modalist...and reject your modalistic-like views."
Mary contributed the full humanity of Christ. His lineage is human back to Adam like ours is.
The trinity/incarnation/Deity of Christ affirms the full Deity and humanity of Christ, one person with two natures. Deity added humanity without ceasing to be Deity (Jn. 1; Phil. 2). Those who deny His Deity are Arian. Those who deny His humanity are Docetic, etc. You misrepresent my view that fully affirms genuine humanity, genuine Deity in one person (unique).
The virgin conception makes this possible.
Jesus' blood was: sinless blood, innocent blood, God's blood (Ac 20:28). Too bad you make no distinction between sinful men (Ps 51:5) and sinless Jesus (Heb 4:15). See: His Unequaled Birth (right click, open) by Adrian Rogers
Mary contributed the full humanity of Christ. His lineage is human back to Adam like ours is.
So just what part of Jesus was divine?
Jesus did not have two Spirits, one human and another divine.
Rather it was that His human spirit was without the effects of sin at His birth and was kept that way by the word of God and oversight of His Father.
Jesus is no example to others if He was God at birth and neither could God be tempted or die as Jesus did.
Your view presents a false view of Jesus who is not a mediator between men and God.
LA